Jump to content


Photo

Will Lana ever put Lana Del Ray on streaming services?


  • Please log in to reply
21 replies to this topic

#1 ONLINE   ilovetati

ilovetati

    Am I that boy that you dream of?

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 3,979 posts
  • Time Online: 221d 6h 36m 40s

Posted 12 August 2019 - 04:11 AM

She used to talk about a reissue and has spoken about the project more in recent years after seeing how much fans love it, but she still seems hesitant to make it available online again. This is likely due to the assertions of inauthenticity surrounding her buying it back and taking it down when Born to Die debuted. Or, perhaps because of the permission needed from David Kahne and the revenue participation due (David Nichtern mentioned that here: http://www.mtv.com/n...ords-interview/).

 

What do we think? 

 

 


  • Sugar Venom, kitschesque, 13bitches and 3 others like this

#2 OFFLINE   SparkleJumpropeNoose

SparkleJumpropeNoose

    "That Radiohead guy"

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 2,228 posts
  • LocationNEW YORK
  • Fan Since:SPRING '16
  • Time Online: 65d 13h 50m 58s

Posted 12 August 2019 - 04:29 AM

she doesnt have the range to remember it


  • Lanalouis1, SlowGinFizzzz, 13bitches and 6 others like this

tumblr_pvhskjtXAX1yrrnlmo1_1280.jpg


#3 OFFLINE   sirensXsilence

sirensXsilence

    Newbie

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 96 posts
  • Fan Since:2011
  • Time Online: 5d 17h 28m 14s

Posted 12 August 2019 - 04:41 AM

I wish she would. It's a great album and deserves more exposure.

That interview is really interesting, btw. Never knew the exact background of the AKA record.
  • kitschesque and 13bitches like this

#4 OFFLINE   MoreCruelThanYou

MoreCruelThanYou

    dumb bitch

  • Banned
  • PipPipPip
  • 1,155 posts
  • Fan Since:5ever
  • Time Online: 20d 18h 11m 7s

Posted 12 August 2019 - 05:01 AM

No, now lock the thread.
tumblr_mg4bvnA8GI1qg6f6do1_500.gif

#5 OFFLINE   longtimeman

longtimeman

    This is an invitation, it's not a threat.

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 1,185 posts
  • Fan Since:23/11/2013
  • Time Online: 324d 6h 34m 19s

Posted 12 August 2019 - 05:07 AM

I think she's never going to be as interested in putting out old music, as she is in whatever she's working on at the moment (for better or worse).


  • Clampigirl likes this

tumblr_ou8g76nUPp1ts8ukho1_250.png


#6 OFFLINE   13bitches

13bitches

    The Greatest Muscle Beach Baby

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 1,064 posts
  • LocationUnited States
  • Fan Since:2016
  • Time Online: 32d 1h 24m 31s

Posted 12 August 2019 - 05:16 AM

After we get the Cherry and PWYC videos
  • JehovahThikness, Noiir, ArtDecoDelRey and 1 other like this

Posted Image


#7 OFFLINE   mergirl

mergirl

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 351 posts
  • LocationNYC, United States
  • Fan Since:2012
  • Time Online: 12d 4h 5m 23s

Posted 12 August 2019 - 05:48 AM

giphy.gif


  • movebaby and RormanNockwell like this

#8 OFFLINE   Coney Island King

Coney Island King

    Expert Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 5,049 posts
  • Time Online: 74d 3h 58m 12s

Posted 12 August 2019 - 06:21 AM

Nope

#9 OFFLINE   KingJay

KingJay

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 230 posts
  • Time Online: 7d 19h 10m 29s

Posted 12 August 2019 - 06:22 AM

Meh, I doubt she ever will, and it’s whatever imo. At least we have it in full and get to enjoy it lol. The only way I would really care is if she maybe re worked the songs as a special edition or something.
  • 13bitches likes this

#10 OFFLINE   recklessdaughter

recklessdaughter

    The Village Witch

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 276 posts
  • Locationthe forest of neldoreth
  • Fan Since:2013
  • Time Online: 25d 1h 45m 17s

Posted 12 August 2019 - 01:26 PM

You need all kinds of permissions to reissue an album or even to put it up on streaming services because other people were involved. Even if she wanted to (don’t know whether she’d want to or not), she can’t just make the choice on her own. It’s illegal.
For example, Stevie Nicks’ first album, Buckingham Nicks, hasn’t been reissued since 1975 and isn’t on streaming services despite her loving the album. Stevie Nicks and Keith Olson (their producer) have been interested in rereleasing it for decades but not everyone involved does, thus it’s been in limbo.
So I imagine Lana could be in a similar situation.
  • kitschesque likes this

#11 OFFLINE   UltraviolentJack

UltraviolentJack

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 719 posts
  • Time Online: 11d 6h 58m 56s

Posted 12 August 2019 - 01:30 PM

No, now lock the thread.

 

why is it whenever people talk about something other than the same 2 topics people ask to lock


  • sirensXsilence likes this

#12 ONLINE   ChaoticLipster

ChaoticLipster

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 715 posts
  • Time Online: 20d 2h 10m 28s

Posted 12 August 2019 - 01:31 PM

She better
  • Gangsta Queen likes this
Arches are Illusions solid at first glance

#13 ONLINE   daisy fresh dropout

daisy fresh dropout

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 247 posts
  • Locationin your bed, on your lips
  • Time Online: 9d 12h 23m 7s

Posted 12 August 2019 - 02:40 PM

she won't. maybe she thinks it doesn't reflect her personality anymore (she still has some aspects that will never change but her perspective has since shifted from that era) and she'd prefer releasing music that reflects how she feels now.


Oh poor me Lana del Rey won’t give me attention


#14 ONLINE   ilovetati

ilovetati

    Am I that boy that you dream of?

  • Topic Starter
  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 3,979 posts
  • Time Online: 221d 6h 36m 40s

Posted 12 August 2019 - 02:44 PM

You need all kinds of permissions to reissue an album or even to put it up on streaming services because other people were involved. Even if she wanted to (don’t know whether she’d want to or not), she can’t just make the choice on her own. It’s illegal.
For example, Stevie Nicks’ first album, Buckingham Nicks, hasn’t been reissued since 1975 and isn’t on streaming services despite her loving the album. Stevie Nicks and Keith Olson (their producer) have been interested in rereleasing it for decades but not everyone involved does, thus it’s been in limbo.
So I imagine Lana could be in a similar situation.


Lana owns AKA. She would just owe royalties.

#15 OFFLINE   UltraviolentJack

UltraviolentJack

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 719 posts
  • Time Online: 11d 6h 58m 56s

Posted 12 August 2019 - 02:47 PM

she won't. maybe she thinks it doesn't reflect her personality anymore (she still has some aspects that will never change but her perspective has since shifted from that era) and she'd prefer releasing music that reflects how she feels now.

 

it's already been released it's just a matter of making it accessible 



#16 ONLINE   TrashMagiq

TrashMagiq

    hiadtfawlmth-bihi stan

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 1,758 posts
  • Fan Since:late 2012
  • Time Online: 44d 9h 56m 50s

Posted 12 August 2019 - 02:55 PM

If ‘Put Me in a Movie” wasn’t on it then maybe she would’ve by now, but the little girls line would cause too much controversy if the song was just out in the open like that. People would take it the wrong way. Also I doubt she’s still even interested in that album. Born to Die was like a fresh start.
  • Noiir, California, plastiscguy and 1 other like this

#17 ONLINE   daisy fresh dropout

daisy fresh dropout

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 247 posts
  • Locationin your bed, on your lips
  • Time Online: 9d 12h 23m 7s

Posted 12 August 2019 - 03:18 PM

it's already been released it's just a matter of making it accessible 

 

it was released almost 10 years ago. i'm saying she may not want it re-released because she's changed as a person over the last decade and AKA just doesn't represent who she is anymore


Oh poor me Lana del Rey won’t give me attention


#18 OFFLINE   recklessdaughter

recklessdaughter

    The Village Witch

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 276 posts
  • Locationthe forest of neldoreth
  • Fan Since:2013
  • Time Online: 25d 1h 45m 17s

Posted 12 August 2019 - 03:25 PM

Lana owns AKA. She would just owe royalties.


Yeah and Stevie Nicks owns Buckingham Nicks too. It doesn’t make a difference.. Owning doesn’t necessarily mean no permissions are required anymore. Most people involved in making it still would be involved in reissuing it. They just can’t rerelease it without Lana’s permission. There’s a lot more factors to reissuing music than just owning the publishing.

#19 OFFLINE   IanadeIrey

IanadeIrey

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 463 posts
  • Time Online: 14d 2h 32m 9s

Posted 12 August 2019 - 07:36 PM

AKA is on Slacker Radio. When you buy a Tesla it comes with Slacker Radio music streaming service and AKA is available under "Lana Del Ray." I was surprised when I saw it! 

 

https://www.slacker....ay/lana-del-ray



#20 ONLINE   HydroponicWeeds

HydroponicWeeds

    Hot Potato

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 1,634 posts
  • LocationRings of Fire, Hell
  • Fan Since:2012
  • Time Online: 34d 1h 25m 45s

Posted 12 August 2019 - 07:54 PM

At some point, maybe. She’s talked about some old unreleased songs even that didn’t have the right production, etc. and that she wants to release some unreleased works. Even if she reworked some tracks into new albums... she could do what she’s done with parts of tracks like the “Lights camera action” thing on HBTB or how she redid Yayo

giphy.gif





0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users