IanadeIrey

This is so interesting to say post-fame (or whatever you want to call it, if she was known but not necessarily 'famous' yet. Regardless, she had an audience). Didn't she record a cover of Born to Die?

Two things come to mind from all this:
(1) Digital footprint is real. We would all fare better if we got offline and stopped trying to farm engagement for the sake of attention. The Internet can be a great medium to put out art, but keep it to that. The comments in her statement about purposely trying to be inflammatory make me think of digital echo chambers in general; what are our true thoughts, and what is simply polluting our inner dialogue? Your 'content diet' is as important as your culinary diet. 
(2) The line between fan and hater is very thin.   

This is so interesting to say post-fame (or whatever you want to call it, if she was known but not necessarily 'famous' yet. Regardless, she had an audience). Didn't she record a cover of Born to Die?

Two things come to mind from all this:
(1) Digital footprint is real. We would all fare better if we got offline and stopped trying to farm engagement for the sake of attention. The Internet can be a great medium to put out art, but keep it to that. The comments in her statement about purposely trying to be inflammatory make me think of digital echo chambers in general; what are our true thoughts, and what is simply polluting our inner dialogue? Your 'content diet' is as important as your culinary diet. 
(2) The line between fan and hater is very thin.   

This is so interesting to say post-fame (or whatever you want to call it, if she was known but not necessarily 'famous' yet. Regardless, she had an audience). Didn't she record a cover of Born to Die?

Two things come to mind from all this:
(1) Digital footprint is real. We would all fare better if we got offline and stopped trying to farm engagement for the sake of attention. The Internet can be a great medium to put out art, but keep it to that. The comments in her statement about purposely trying to be inflammatory make me think of digital echo chambers in general; what are our true thoughts, and what is simply polluting our inner dialogue? Your 'content diet' is as important as your culinary diet. 
(2) The line between fan and hater is very thin.   

This is so interesting to say post-fame (or whatever you want to call it, if she was known but not necessarily 'famous' yet. Regardless, she had an audience). Didn't she record a cover of Born to Die?

Two things come to mind from all this:
(1) Digital footprint is real. We would all fare better if we got offline and stopped trying to farm engagement for the sake of attention. The Internet can be a great medium to put out art, but keep it to that. The comments in her statement about purposely trying to be inflammatory make me think of digital echo chambers in general; what are our true thoughts, and what is simply polluting our inner dialogue? Your 'content diet' is as important as your culinary diet. 
(2) The line between fan and hater is very thin.   

This is so interesting to say post-fame (or whatever you want to call it, if she was known but not necessarily 'famous' yet. Regardless, she had an audience). Didn't she record a cover of Born to Die?

Two things come to mind from all this:
(1) Digital footprint is real. We would all fare better if we got offline and stopped trying to farm engagement for the sake of attention. The Internet can be a great medium to put out art, but keep it to that. The comments in her statement about purposely trying to be inflammatory make me think of digital echo chambers in general; what are our true thoughts, and what is simply polluting our inner dialogue? Your 'content diet' is as important as your culinary diet. 
(2) The line between fan and hater is very thin.   

The difference between being ironically racist for engagement farming and being genuinely racist is an irrelevant asterisk added to the genuinely racist thing said. 

This is so interesting to say post-fame (or whatever you want to call it, if she was known but not necessarily 'famous' yet. Regardless, she had an audience). Didn't she record a cover of Born to Die?

Two things come to mind from all this:
(1) Digital footprint is real. We would all fare better if we got offline and stopped trying to farm engagement for the sake of attention. The Internet can be a great medium to put out art, but keep it to that. The comments in her statement about purposely trying to be inflammatory make me think of digital echo chambers in general; what are our true thoughts, and what is simply polluting our inner dialogue? Your 'content diet' is as important as your culinary diet. 
(2) The line between fan and hater is very thin.   

This is so interesting to say post-fame (or whatever you want to call it, if she was known but not necessarily 'famous' yet. Regardless, she had an audience). Didn't she record a cover of Born to Die?

Two things come to mind from all this:
(1) Digital footprint is real. We would all fare better if we got offline and stopped trying to farm engagement for the sake of attention. The Internet can be a great medium to put out art, but keep it to that. The comments in her statement about purposely trying to be inflammatory make me think of digital echo chambers in general; what are our true thoughts, and what is simply polluting our inner dialogue? Your 'content diet' is as important as your culinary diet. 
(2) The line between fan and hater is very thin.   

She did indeed do a cover of born to die.

This is so interesting to say post-fame (or whatever you want to call it, if she was known but not necessarily 'famous' yet. Regardless, she had an audience). Didn't she record a cover of Born to Die?

Two things come to mind from all this:
(1) Digital footprint is real. We would all fare better if we got offline and stopped trying to farm engagement for the sake of attention. The Internet can be a great medium to put out art, but keep it to that. The comments in her statement about purposely trying to be inflammatory make me think of digital echo chambers in general; what are our true thoughts, and what is simply polluting our inner dialogue? Your 'content diet' is as important as your culinary diet. 
(2) The line between fan and hater is very thin.   

This is so interesting to say post-fame (or whatever you want to call it, if she was known but not necessarily 'famous' yet. Regardless, she had an audience). Didn't she record a cover of Born to Die?

Two things come to mind from all this:
(1) Digital footprint is real. We would all fare better if we got offline and stopped trying to farm engagement for the sake of attention. The Internet can be a great medium to put out art, but keep it to that. The comments in her statement about purposely trying to be inflammatory make me think of digital echo chambers in general; what are our true thoughts, and what is simply polluting our inner dialogue? Your 'content diet' is as important as your culinary diet. 
(2) The line between fan and hater is very thin.   

This is so interesting to say post-fame (or whatever you want to call it, if she was known but not necessarily 'famous' yet. Regardless, she had an audience). Didn't she record a cover of Born to Die?

Two things come to mind from all this:
(1) Digital footprint is real. We would all fare better if we got offline and stopped trying to farm engagement for the sake of attention. The Internet can be a great medium to put out art, but keep it to that. The comments in her statement about purposely trying to be inflammatory make me think of digital echo chambers in general; what are our true thoughts, and what is simply polluting our inner dialogue? Your 'content diet' is as important as your culinary diet. 
(2) The line between fan and hater is very thin.   

This is so interesting to say post-fame (or whatever you want to call it, if she was known but not necessarily 'famous' yet. Regardless, she had an audience). Didn't she record a cover of Born to Die?

Two things come to mind from all this:
(1) Digital footprint is real. We would all fare better if we got offline and stopped trying to farm engagement for the sake of attention. The Internet can be a great medium to put out art, but keep it to that. The comments in her statement about purposely trying to be inflammatory make me think of digital echo chambers in general; what are our true thoughts, and what is simply polluting our inner dialogue? Your 'content diet' is as important as your culinary diet. 
(2) The line between fan and hater is very thin.   

The Tortured Poets Department

The Tortured Poets Department

The Tortured Poets Department

The Tortured Poets Department

The Tortured Poets Department

The Tortured Poets Department

The Tortured Poets Department

The Tortured Poets Department

The Tortured Poets Department

The Tortured Poets Department

I know dancer discourse is probably old and I'll keep it light since Lana obviously loves them but:

With this current setlist, they are occasionally at odds with the music and this incongruity is jarring at worst and funny at best. I think they were perfect for a song like Cherry...but I see them during Henry, Come On and they almost come across as though they are parodying the song. The songs are, for the most part, thoughtful and cerebral, so to have these women writhing around, shaking ass, or doing overly-pantomimed TikTok-esque dances feels silly next to Lana's ethereal emoting in the spotlight. 

They are most effective when: (1) they adopt soft movements and assume an almost ballerina-like form (during Chemtrails); (2) they are relegated to the background/sidestage as frozen figures (during Stars Fell on Alabama); or (3) their dance is contextually appropriate to the song (during Stand By Your Man). Otherwise, the sort of limp and drapey choreography that ends up being a little bit of a pastiche of yoga isn't doing it for me anymore, if it ever was at any point!

What a lovely surprise! IYLDWM should have been a permanent part of this setlist - it’s one of her most “country” songs so it would have been a no-brainer to sing it at every show.