bluechemtrails Posted October 20 Posted October 20 Somehow distorting, the charts then no longer reflect what people really like to hear. 5 Quote
Veinsineon Posted October 20 Posted October 20 Absolutely no changes or mention of the vinyl variant / album packaging loophole people use to game the charts even harder. Which I feel is probably the worst offender when it comes to affecting the accuracy of charts, 19 Quote
Embach Posted October 20 Posted October 20 Absolutely ruins the point of charts wtf, imagine if they did this with albums, even worse. 3 Quote
vale acrylics Posted October 20 Posted October 20 these fuckfaces did this right when die with a smile was shaping up to be the biggest organic hit on the 100, they can seriously choke it's THAT serious to me 10 Quote Hope is very far.
Barry Posted October 20 Posted October 20 38 minutes ago, Embach said: Absolutely ruins the point of charts wtf, imagine if they did this with albums, even worse. You would think they would just make charts of more recent songs instead as like little side charts. Like Top 100 released this year or Top 100 released in the past 5 years and 10 years where they could exclude older songs. 1 Quote
ChaoticLipster Posted October 20 Posted October 20 What a fucking stupid and insane rule change, tons of things they need to change but instead they want to pretend songs are not selling? How about they ban mutiple songs from albums charting at once and limit sales from variants. 6 Quote Arches are Illusions solid at first glance
Sinner Get Ready Posted October 20 Posted October 20 Why are they acting like BB is a video game and they’re trying to weed out cheaters by implementing these idiotic rules? Girl what this isn’t League of Legends Implement rules on artists making 927 vinyl variants per album wtf 9 Quote
Dark Angel Posted October 20 Posted October 20 now that is insanely stupid and won't reflect what people are listening to and what's popular accurately, so what if a song's been on the charts for 78+ weeks? it just shows it has longevity 3 Quote 𝔬𝔲𝔱 𝔴𝔦𝔱𝔥 𝔞 𝔟𝔞𝔫𝔤
ultrablvd Posted October 20 Posted October 20 but they wont plug the insane loophole of certain people flogging 999 variants of cd's/vinyl to manufacture false demand lmao 8 Quote resident sweeter 24/7/17 - 9/7/23 - 10/7/23 - 23/6/25 - 29/6/25 - 3/7/25 - 4/7/25
shadesofblue Posted October 20 Posted October 20 2 hours ago, takemybreath said: this rule is dumb but at least this happened 5 Quote ♡︎ 𝒾𝓃𝓉𝑜 𝓉𝒽𝑒 𝒷𝓁𝓊𝑒 ♡︎
jimmyjimmycocoapuff Posted October 20 Posted October 20 they saw that First Light was going to be a 79 week chart topping mega smash and had to act quick those fuckers 1 Quote
takemybreath Posted October 20 Author Posted October 20 1 minute ago, jimmyjimmycocoapuff said: they saw that First Light was going to be a 79 week chart topping mega smash and had to act quick 4 Quote ‧₊˚🖇️ — has anyone else died for you?
elizaburgers Posted October 20 Posted October 20 1 hour ago, shadesofblue said: this rule is dumb but at least this happened & Lose Taste 0 Quote
affa03 Posted October 21 Posted October 21 #billboardisoverparty!!! Just gives artists more of a reason not to care about charts . 1 Quote "MEOW"
Mer Posted October 21 Posted October 21 I really don’t get why it matters if a song has been charting for a long time? Unless it’s only being propped up by radio play (payola); if people are streaming it, it deserves its spot. 6 Quote I would trade the Cartier for someone to trust (just kidding)
affa03 Posted October 21 Posted October 21 Wait there's a positive to this, ordinary can't stay on the charts for long now right? 2 Quote "MEOW"
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.