kik Posted September 12, 2014 Posted September 12, 2014 Ok, now that I got your attention... Many celebs have posed nude. What is considered artistic or erotic nude (not pornography). Mostly supermodels and actresses. Let's just pretend Lana would accept to pose for a "respectable" erotic magazine like Playboy (bleh)... or pose nude for the prized Pirelli Calendar. I'm pretty sure she would never do that. It's not her style and I think it would be a mistake for her career blah blah blah but that's not the point... My question is: Would you opinion of her be different after that? In what way, according to your personal system of values?
BlueJeans Posted September 12, 2014 Posted September 12, 2014 That's not real nude Weeeeeeeeeeeeeeeell ... It's not boobs and va-jayjay but ... 1
Limelight Posted September 12, 2014 Posted September 12, 2014 No, my opinion wouldn't change. I would even get a calender and put in my room
Philomene Posted September 12, 2014 Posted September 12, 2014 I think it would fit well into her aesthetics, she likes the beauty of the body and especially HER body. So why not? Remember the Whitman poem she reads in Tropico. I don't understand why people judge others for posing nude. If someone uses what nature or surgery gave them it's their choice. 8
HEARTCORE Posted September 12, 2014 Posted September 12, 2014 why would it affect me in any way? it's her decision to pose naked, it affects her only. there's nothing wrong with expression of the body. 3
ExoticFlower Posted September 12, 2014 Posted September 12, 2014 We have a wide range of high fashion magazines at where I work, and some of the covers and editorials can look quite stunning really. It's not just about seeing tits and ass and pussy, but also about how you present the female form. Our body is a work of nature, just like our face and legs, it's a cultural choice to shun nudity and look down upon it. What's so wrong about admiring a couple of very nicely photographed breasts with great color exposure at a flattering angle? There's porn, and there's, well, art. Or fashion, or whatever you prefer to call it. Lana has already been on the cover of GQ covered in nothing but expensive jewelry and tasteful makeup, and I don't think she's the type to pull a Miley or a Keira Knightly, but I wouldn't complain if she did. It would be interesting, and she's too professional to make it overly sexual in the wrong way. But in my honest opinion, she's already all that in both face and presence, she doesn't need the full frontal nudity to confirm her femininity. 5
Bae Posted September 12, 2014 Posted September 12, 2014 No. She's an adult and I don't think there's anything wrong with posing nude. 1
Mind Melt Posted September 13, 2014 Posted September 13, 2014 I think there's nothing wrong with it Honestly I thought the UV cover would be 1000x better if she wasn't wearing a bra (this sounds so creepy..) 2
Thunder Revenant Posted September 13, 2014 Posted September 13, 2014 Nothing wrong with that but at the same time it's not a must-have for me. If she did it, I am sure it would be a classy shoot. If she won't, then I am not sad about it either. However, we have the GQ shoot which is gr8 & sexy and i think it's much more interesting to "hint" something than to completely put it into the spotlight. Just do it. Just do it - don't wait!
fl0ridakil0s Posted September 13, 2014 Posted September 13, 2014 Weeeeeeeeeeeeeeeell ... It's not boobs and va-jayjay but ... "va-jayjay" why am i laughing so much
DominicMars Posted September 13, 2014 Posted September 13, 2014 I'd love if she did some more nudity. I'd be down for a coffee-table book a la Madonna's Sex book tbh 2
KafkaOnTheBeach Posted September 13, 2014 Posted September 13, 2014 I'm ok if she does classy nudity like the GQ photoshoot. But trash nudity is the worst i think, like playboy or something like that. It's not her style. 1 Paint me happy in Blue
GodBlessMe Posted September 13, 2014 Posted September 13, 2014 If we ever get any more photo shoots it would be cool! I AM MY ONLY GOD
Wilde_child Posted September 15, 2014 Posted September 15, 2014 Marilyn posed nude (when she was older, years after the Playboy thing when she was a model) and it was a beautiful shoot.
longtimeman Posted September 15, 2014 Posted September 15, 2014 There's two questions here. Firstly, I would not lose any respect for her if she did it. It's her body, and she can do what she wants with it. The second question that comes to my mind is would I want to see the pictures? I honestly don't know if I'd want to. Almost any time I see an actress I like in a movie where they're naked, I feel more awkward than anything else. I'm sure there are exceptions, but most directors and photographers don't seem to know how to shoot nudity in an interesting way, without making it either porn or depressing (or both). The photo posted above is pretty good, but is only about 10% as sexy as the shots of her walking the street in jeans and t-shirt, or where she's smoking with leather jacket on. I don't see the point in looking at nude pictures of celebrities unless they personally invited me to take them (in which case I'm talking a lot of them, and looking at them a lot). 1
Lirazel Posted September 15, 2014 Posted September 15, 2014 I wouldn't mind those pictures, but I'm also not excited over them. I guess it depends on how they would look? But I would never shame her for having nude photos.If she became a Playboy girl of the month, I would probably buy it. i am nothing and should be everything
Recommended Posts