viagra

1 minute ago, racecar said:

oh honey... better delete that site name...

Didnt know it was banned here 

The nudes of someone on that site 

Mod note: don't say where to find leaks

I dont get the hype about Fingertips outside of its lyrics, but it would be better as a poem than a song. 

2 minutes ago, anwdelrey said:

Iirc the reception to The Grants when the 3 leaks happened was lukewarm at best. But then again I don’t trust this forum’s taste at all. We shall see.

I prefer it to Sweet and Fingertips.   It has one of the most beautiful melodies she has ever written

The GP will eat up The Grants, its very accessible and melodic, its a great single, wth

Its pretty mid as her all albums. The trinity: Jaded, Violet Chemistry, River

 Rosemead ruined everything

Just now, palemoonbaby said:

if this is surprise release, he obviously would debunking it (while it's real)

How would that make any marketing sense when all the hype is on 23 March

Just now, lanitataco said:

ok ok, if the album is coming out tonight lets give it until midnight west coast just in case. i dont want to jump onto her page and not see an album at midnight est

He said on atrl this  wasnt the  case

Movie accompaying the album?

She is releasing another album this year?

The change starts with education not with prohibiting someone to say something.

1 minute ago, Sportscruiser said:

 

Because we’ve been examining her previous “polemic” stances or lyrics and while most of us agree she has never deserved the hate and cancelation attempts that came her way, an user also said they advocate for absolute speech and I commented on that.

 

But “Harry Nilsson has a song, his voice breaks at 3:05” I guess.

Thats something non-americans will never understand, the freedom of speech is the most protected right and is way more used in absolute sense in the US.

2 minutes ago, Sportscruiser said:

 

Oh babe, you’re totally fine! I was actually referring to some things that Vertimus said that, while being surely well-intentioned, can be easily twisted into something more sinister. Asking for nuance doesn’t invalidate that are certain things (intolerance, prejudice, bigotry, etc) that require a more direct and objective moral stance. Not everything is black and white but not everything is grey either.

 

This conversation is happening because of a certain lyric contained in a certain song from the upcoming album. It’s incredibly relevant, as ever.

How is her certain lyric relevant to what you typed out?

2 minutes ago, Sportscruiser said:

 

I was being polite and diplomatic. I agree with people having to see between the lines instead of jumping into modern-day lynches that serve no purpose other than incessant virtue signaling - however delving into the “everyone is entitled to feel, think and say whatever they want because who are we to police that?” rhetoric is dangerous because it’s exactly what the far right extremists use as ammo. There are ideals and values that should be reprimanded and questioned when they put the safety and the existence of large groups of people at risk. I will not not intervene if/when that happens.

This is irrelevant to Lana´s music though. She never crossed the line in her lyrics to be considered hate speaker. All the controversy about her words is blown-out stupidity.

Can we stop with this political correctness shit? Art will always be controversial and shit.

Taco is pop excellence

The fact the best songs of the album (Fingertips, The Grants and probably Let the Light in) are the only songs not produced by Jack. 

why dont you just wait and not rely on the taste of someone u dont know 

Honestly the Sean situation has brought new depth to the title song for me. Its like she lost a bit of herself and now she is longing to reconnect. He must have been an important person for her that she let him enter her preserved world only a few came in. This album has much bigger potential to feel  more inspired and personal than BB. The title track is already better than the whole album

6 hours ago, mypolaroidfrown said:

The online media Outlets have picked up on the Tulsa billboard situation and they've totally ran with it.  They're painting her out to be the crazy ex-girlfriend.  I really hope she doesn't do any other obvious things that are directed at or related to Sean. I'm just worried that this sort of drama will overshadow the press for the new record. All the interviews and press she'll be doing around release time, you know they're going to want to ask questions about this whole situation. I understand she may be going through a tough time, I just don't want the media Outlets & haters to have more tabloid fodder & clickbait.  They ripped her apart over QFTC, and I hate to see her be painted as "crazy ex gf" in the media now.

Controversy has always worked for her. It helps her to sell more records.

Maybe the media coverage was the intention. Now Sean cant escape her even more.

why are u fags so hungry for every information about the album? The album is 3 months away, do u want to suffer these dry months in pain with no suprises?

Who the fk puts some youtube rips on their official album? This is the new low for her, lazy as hell