Jump to content

brokenfaith

Members
  • Content Count

    248
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by brokenfaith


  1. Wow, I'm high key disappointed :crossed: that we still don't have Honeymoon in HQ. Does that mean the date for Music To Watch is also fake? yikes.

     

    For those who have heard Honeymoon on Beats 1 you guys know what I am talking about. There is a stark difference. I'm going to list them here: :makeup:

     

    - The strings at the beginning the of the song is knife SHARP on Beats 1 PIERCING.

    - Her voice on "We Both KNOW' also sounds different.

    - There's a soft layering effect on the song. It's missing on YT.

    - Most importantly, right before the chorus there's a thunderous BOOM sound drop thing before she goes "OUR Honeymoon" similar to Young and Beautiful.

    - The dun dun dun sound on the bridge is much louder in HQ

     

    That is all I can recollect from my experience listening to Honeymoon in Beats 1 HQ.

    Do you have a link ??


  2. an opinion isn't an opinion if it's just reckless and insulting behaviour. people will never let that go unchallenged.

     

    one loses freedom of speech when they begin to disregard the emotions of others.

     

    age old saying: there's a difference between being a balanced critic and being a cock-juggling thunder-cunt.

    Wtf? You're being ridiculous :rip: literally it's about a song on a music forum, who cares?

  3. Woah!

    If you guys don't like to read dreams just ignore them smh (Like I ignore 95% of this thread).

    I have my rights to post anything I like to.

    Don't like what I write? Ignore it.

    Mess, no one cares about your dream. Especially not in this thread.

    Well, getting back to the point of Honeymoon, is anyone else going to have a complete listen-through of Lana's music before the record drops? I did that before UV came out and I did it for Marina before FROOT released. I'm definitely listening through AKA, BTD+P, and UV before.

    Yup, the month before a new album I always blast the artist's discography nonstop in excitement


  4. U say dis but btd itself doesn't even have that many lyrics. The bridge is literally the same lyrics as the rest of it lol.

    BTD is far more interesting. Has a beautifully written and worded chorus, unlike HM's lazily written chorus of the title repeated over and over again

    Choruses on BTD are significantly better than those on UV and HM song. She's gotten so lazy with the repetition and choruses


  5. It's insulting, the fuck you arguing about it. Shit could mean a lot of things but the way they have been using it is not in the nicest way they could find. And tbh let's move on that shit conversation is so yesterday.

    It doesn't matter though. Not everyone has to like everything Lana puts out lmao the person literally said "if you don't like it, don't say anything." That is moronic. I don't love the song, and I will express that as freely as i want. I do like it though, quite a bit


  6. I'm all in for people having their own voice and opinion but you're wrong. Calling Honeymoon 'shit' is not stating an opinion, it's actually insulting towards Lana and those who actually like the song. If you don't like something you keep quiet or you state it in a non-inflammatory way. Simple.

    Stfu and get over yourself lmfao

    someone can think it's "shit" if they want. It's not insulting to me, and I'm sure Lana couldn't care less

     

    HM is really growing on me, anyway. I like it a lot.


  7. ^^^ agreed, you can tell that "our honeymoon" repeated four times is NOT gonna be an epic chorus. So much of UV was repetitive like that with just the title repeated four times, considered a "chorus." I mean, UV had great verse melodies and some great choruses, but overall... Ultraviolence, Sad Girl, PWYC, FMWUTTT, and bonus tracks...all so repetitive.

     

    Idk where the epic, wordy choruses of BTD disappeared to :(

×
×
  • Create New...