Jump to content

Rivers

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Content Count

    600

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Rivers

  3. Posted

    15 minutes ago, ultrabanisters said:

    this thread has me giggling a lil actually

     

    you do not need to defend a billionaire climate disaster polluter just because she is your fav. you can love her but also question and critique her evidently abhorrent practices, including attempting to sue people spreading publicly available info

     

    as someone said, barbara streissand effect in full swing

     

    p.p.s: crying blackmail over an obvious half joke is so unserious can we please critically think :trisha2:

    Okay, I'll send you some things in DM which I can just refer to later as a "half joke". Your words have legal consequences. You can't just do whatever you want to do and say whatever you want to say without consequences. 

     

    mod note: please try not to engage in more-than-necessary arguments with other members. you are welcome to discuss and lightly critique eachother but please do not incite arguments or threaten other members lol. user warned

    0

  5. Posted

    7 minutes ago, twinkletoes7 said:

    i do not wish to be a lawyer queen i’m sure someone will appreciate that though! my point there is that it is not blackmail that would hold up very well in court, considering said damaging information is legally publicly available. so it’s not really revealing(exposing) as much so highlighting what’s already public :)

    You can still legally violate black mail statutes even if the information acquired is publicly available information. The legal violation occurs when one asks for financial compensation (like a prostitute threatening a popular John) to not release any type of information. It doesn't require that the information about the person is an illegal act. For instance, threatening someone they will publish photos of a secret trist, unless they are financially compensated, is by legal definition, black mail. 

    0

  6. Posted

    5 minutes ago, twinkletoes7 said:

    jokingly asking for a model x to stop releasing completely public information that is not illegal to obtain or share is not blackmail, i think u need a nap sweet pea <3

    By performing an action on the sole consideration with threat, for financial compensation is in fact by legal definition black mail. Didn't pass the bar did ya girl? Kim Kardashian can help you out. In Cali you can take the bar exam without attending a legal college, although Calis bar exams is slightly more difficult than other states. 

     

     

    "demanding payment or another benefit from someone in return for not revealing compromising or damaging information about them."

     

    0

  8. Posted

    12 minutes ago, Coloringbooks said:

     

    "Toilet Sniff" and "aryan goddess" are immature and childish yes likewise to Taylor herself, but funny. If you were offended by this I'm sorry. 

     

    "Childish, conniving and manipulative bully" is true. In this case she's bullying someone who's like, two decades younger and 1000x less powerful than her. A lot of rich people use their lawyers to send threats that have no basis, hoping that the other person will relent because they can't afford a lawyer. That's bullying and it's childish- she has fully entered into villain billionaire territory. This is truly disgusting behavior from her.

     

    Also Lana hasn't stooped to Taylor's level of climate terrorism as far as I know, but if she did and tried to sue a student for publicising that already public information... I'd be having the same reaction as I am right now lol. That's insane

    Terrorism?!?!?!?!.... You have completely lost your mind!!!!!! What in the actual f*ck do you know about terrorism?!?! You are presenting that you are an insane radicalized extremist sociopath. 

    Do you have any idea what slander is? 

    2

  9. Posted

    4 minutes ago, bigspender said:

    some of yall are so embarassing 😭😭

     

    can we all agree on some things?

     

    carbon emissions and pollution? BAD!

    sharing of public information? NOT COURT WORTHY!

    college student who just wants a car? WHO GIVES A FUCK!

     

     

    seriously some of you are adults please grow up and stop looking like an idiot in defense of someone who doesn’t know you exist and couldn’t care less if you did or didn’t. 

    You are reframing his intentions and disregarding his illegal abuses. So you support black mailing Lana so you can buy a model x? Do yourself a favor, and don't downplay his manipulative and ILLEGAL actions. How about write a letter to a senator about a carbon tax policy and plant a tree? 

    0

  10. Posted

    17 minutes ago, Coloringbooks said:

    Of course the biased Taylor stan who's been hellbent on blindly defending her since page #1 would say something like this :lmao: 

    I know it's hard to admit that you and your aryan goddess are clearly in the wrong, but I dislike her for a multitude of reasons; eco-terrorism being one of them. Stop deflecting onto other celebs

     

    I have barely listened to Taylor's music. I am pretty critical of pop culture and pop music. You seem to have zero understanding of my identity, and tastes or biases. In some ways it feels embarrassing to me, that I am here, in some ways, defending Taylor, and others who are opulently rich. I don't hold it against them, and don't prejudicialy devalue people based on their net worth and their actions associated with their net worth lifestyle. It seems difficult for people to accept in the macro sense. This is why society by and large,.does not understand the lives of the popular, and focuses their attention upon those with unnecessary obtuse criticism. But at some point I have to be honest with my own biases, address things rationally, and call a spade a spade.

    0

  11. Posted

    5 minutes ago, Coloringbooks said:

    Of course the biased Taylor stan who's been hellbent on blindly defending her since page #1 would say something like this :lmao: 

    I know it's hard to admit that you and your aryan goddess are clearly in the wrong, but I dislike her for a multitude of reasons; eco-terrorism being one of them. Stop deflecting onto other celebs

    You are literally referring to her as a terrorist, of which is classified by those whom use physical violence or the threat of physical violence to defend a political ideology. *The same thing the US government does, but Taylor and Lana don't.*

     

    You have been radicalized by ignorant extremists  

    0

  14. Posted

    2 minutes ago, bigspender said:

    i’m kinda weak at this :teehee:

     

    how is this kid a manipulative person? and engaging in blackmail? 

     

    he’s posting PUBLIC INFORMATION 

    and i promise you he’s doing less environmental impact than your girl taylor? 

     

    He said he would stop posting the data if Elon gave him a model x. That's straight up black mail. 

     

    Nevermind he doesn't seem to actually care about the environment and is doing all of this for the attention. 

     

    The comparison you are making is an apples to oranges. He doesn't have a tour, nor has he ever shown he has any interest whatsoever in his own personal carbon footprint. We are defending a person who doesnt care about the very issue he gets attention about. I don't know how many more ways I can highlight this person's severe hypocrisy without restating how manipulative this person is and how he doesn't actually seem to care about the environment at all and all this is solely for attention seeking. 

    0

  17. Posted

    7 minutes ago, bluechemtrails said:

    She could do so much for the environment with her money to compensate her ecological footprint. And it would be so exemplary for many other people, I think she's missing something here.

    That's true. She could plant a billion trees. But so could the corporations who fly tangerines half way around the world, just to send them right back. The point is, we aren't addressing the largest polluters and propping up popular people as the major issue, which is a total distraction. A mature person would advocate a carbon tax on these things. Rather than underhanded paparazzi strategies. They just want to tear people to pieces they are jealous of. Taylor could use some humility but this method is not the ideal way to get that result. 

     

    For all the girlies oogling over this guy,

    let us know when y'all go on a date with this guy and tell us what he is really like...🤠

    2

  20. Posted

    8 minutes ago, Embach said:

    Oh that's fkin not I- :toofunny:

    At least he does something unlike some politicians and billionares

    When was the last time you think this kid did anything for the environment like planting a tree? And now we are advocating quasi black mail? 

     

    Is he tracking apples that leave California and go to Africa to get sprayed with wax and then flown back? Of course not. It's celebrity obsession disorder with a need for attention. It's quite similar to throwing paint on the mona Lisa because of climate change. Solves nothing. Just pisses people off..

     

    As far as the flying versus private jet, it's actually more environmentally friendly to fly on a plane with 80 people than it is to take a bus with 20 people.  The union of concerned scientists pointed to a lot of the flaws about carbon emissions from various types of vehicles. They are widely misinterpreted. 

    0

  21. Posted

    1 minute ago, one time beauty queen said:

    he looks like a Sensitive Young Man.... I'm with him💯

    Image

     

    He said he would stop tracking Elon if Elon bought him a Tesla. He's just another shallow person who loves the attention and who isn't doing anything to actually offset carbon emissions, like planting trees. He is a tmz paparazzi type of academia. Its just petty and childish and doing it for the attention. 

    2

  24. Posted

    I looked into the law in this situation when people were threatening to fire bomb Tesla factories and a grimes stalker almost made Elon wreck with his son in the car. The privacy aspect of the law allows for them (Taylor) to block the jets location until sometime after they have landed. But then it can be put into public record some hours after they have landed. Looks like Taylor's lawyers don't know the full ins and outs of that law if they are filing a cease and desist. It will be extremely difficult for taylor to prove emotional distress beyond reasonable doubt in the court of law. 

    3
×
×
  • Create New...