Coney Island King Posted September 10, 2015 Posted September 10, 2015 the single cover could relate to the video in some way, you never know. 0 Quote
LAman Posted September 10, 2015 Posted September 10, 2015 Does anyone think of this when the "live to love you, boy" part is on?? https://youtu.be/9uo9oy-Eqo4?t=2m15s 1 Quote
LAman Posted September 10, 2015 Posted September 10, 2015 Btw I love the cover for MTWBT. I kinda wish it was used for the album cover, even though the album is called Honeymoon 1 Quote
rdp Posted September 10, 2015 Posted September 10, 2015 Okay after a few listens late at night this has grown a lot on me. The chorus is amazing. I feel it's a bit disconnected from the other songs this era other than the dramatic & heavy strings buuuut maybe it'll all make sense when the full album comes out. 2 Quote
SuperMegaStan Posted September 10, 2015 Posted September 10, 2015 On 9/10/2015 at 5:19 AM, Danube said: Mess! Everyone of these song reveals is the same 1. Everyone praises it to death for the first couple of pages 2. Someone criticises the lyrics/production 3. BTD stans get upset that it doesn't sound like a rehash of BTD 4. People begin to turn on the song 5. It starts to seem that everyone hates the song A couple of months pass... 6. Everyone loves the song again The exact same thing happened with all the Ultraviolence singles/promo singles. sorry I've been loving every singles/promo singles from UV since their releases and i will never change my opinion on this! 2 Quote
YUNGATA Posted September 10, 2015 Posted September 10, 2015 On 9/10/2015 at 5:35 AM, lmdr said: Reminds me a lot of Sad Girl right? the melody in the verses in really similar. 1 Quote
neuf Posted September 10, 2015 Posted September 10, 2015 I hope all the songs aren't drenched in strings like so far. Art Deco has a lot of synths listed in the credits so maybe it'll be upbeat. 1 Quote
Coney Island King Posted September 10, 2015 Posted September 10, 2015 synths are heaven i hope the album is dripping with them. i want to feel that opulence and beauty xxxxx 2 Quote
BlueJeans Posted September 10, 2015 Posted September 10, 2015 Sounds a LOT like Sad Girl, indeed, I see I'm not the only only one thinking that. I think that in this case, my imagination played tricks with me cause it's really not what I was expecting. But although the melody is very reminiscent of Sad Girl, even to the production (the flute making solos recurrently after she sings each Line in the verses) it's ... Something else. 3 Quote
rumandritalin Posted September 10, 2015 Posted September 10, 2015 HBTB > MTWBT = TLY = HM I feel like MTWBT TLY and HM are all pretty successful at being pretty sounding vignettes that are easy to listen to and overall equivalent. It's very May Jailer meets Paradise Lana. MTWBT was clearly produced and written to stand out but I think they are all pretty equivalent with TLY having that bridge and HM is just as beautiful if only for there's just not a lot going on there for a good while. And the whole pico boulevard line is a travesty. HBTB is also that too, but it's also got some of the witty/funny/bratty which I used to consider to be one of her constants. It passes the fun test barely because of easy writing that is a little unmemorable if easy to remember, but as always the one true constant, it's all a cohesive collected piece that works great thanks to visionary production and delivery. Still a bitter truth that HBTB got tired on repeat real quick as opposed to UV or WC which are like pretty immune to repeat fatigue. I've been bad about having mostly the first half of UV playing in my car for months on end. Despite that honest critique I love the singles and I feel like Honeymoon is gonna flow like butter. Down, Up, Up, Down. I'm chill with a dark, pretty sounding easy listen. 0 Quote
FutureRetro Posted September 10, 2015 Posted September 10, 2015 I'm listening to it on headphones and it doesn't like Sad Girl. The percussion in this song is very rich deep NOT shallow like Sad Girl not to mention the mixing is totally different. 0 Quote
SuperMegaStan Posted September 10, 2015 Posted September 10, 2015 On 9/10/2015 at 9:27 AM, LAman said: Does anyone think of this when the "live to love you, boy" part is on?? https://youtu.be/9uo9oy-Eqo4?t=2m15s i think of FMWUTTT actually. 0 Quote
renaissance Posted September 10, 2015 Posted September 10, 2015 OK but does the cover remind anyone else of 'Bangerz'????????????????????????? On 9/10/2015 at 9:27 AM, LAman said: Does anyone think of this when the "live to love you, boy" part is on?? https://youtu.be/9uo9oy-Eqo4?t=2m15s Completely unrelated, but what happened to her album being released this year? And Fergie's? 0 Quote
BlueJeans Posted September 10, 2015 Posted September 10, 2015 Yes absolutely, thought of Bangerz too ! 0 Quote
Coney Island King Posted September 10, 2015 Posted September 10, 2015 neon signs existed before bangerz, so no i cant say that it does. 8 Quote
Goddess Posted September 10, 2015 Posted September 10, 2015 I seem to be the only one but I feel like the cover art goes well with the song. They both give me a surf noir/island vibe... And I like neon signs as a work of art ala Tracey Emin (visual artist). 7 Quote He loves me with every beat of his cocaine heart.
HugoRockz Posted September 10, 2015 Posted September 10, 2015 On 9/10/2015 at 8:46 PM, Exotic Nightshade said: I seem to be the only one but I feel like the cover art goes well with the song. They both give me a surf noir/island vibe... And I like neon signs as a work of art ala Tracey Emin (visual artist). I agree with you and so is the music production. I love it! 0 Quote
higby Posted September 10, 2015 Posted September 10, 2015 On 9/10/2015 at 9:27 AM, LAman said: Does anyone think of this when the "live to love you, boy" part is on?? https://youtu.be/9uo9oy-Eqo4?t=2m15s never. 0 Quote
DeadAgainst Posted September 10, 2015 Posted September 10, 2015 Strings are beautiful and soulful and timeless, synthesizers are for soulless bastard 80's robot children 0 Quote
KillKillQueen Posted September 11, 2015 Posted September 11, 2015 On 9/10/2015 at 11:43 PM, DeadAgainst said: Strings are beautiful and soulful and timeless, synthesizers are for soulless bastard 80's robot children Do you also think UV is more pure and Authentic then BTD 0 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.