traleon

maybe im misunderstanding what youre saying, but Punish isnt "about a real life case" it just uses Plauche as an analogy and thats it. 
 
also im confused with "pederasty/pedophilia isnt a philia". uh yeah it is? hence the name? necrophilia is also a philia even though it is a heinous crime. being a crime doesnt revoke its philia status. 
 
anyways, i still think Punish is actually a far better deconstruction of and helpful insight into pedophilic abuse than most pedo-denouncing media we're subjected to. 
 
i oft think about those "pedo catchers" content farms online who clearly do not *really* care about helping abused children, they just want to find someone society is understandably too scared to defend so they can beat the shit out of them for fun and record it. i feel like those channels are an extreme microcosm of the average persons sentiment. the avg joe does not want to put in the effort for real change and preventative action, that would require very hard work, mercy/understanding for the abhorrent, plus dismantling and reworking abusive institutions like the church and the family. while they would never admit it for virtue signaling reasons, a large percent of ppl would rather just stick their head in the sand pretending abuse isnt transpiring, and only after-the-fact tie the pedo to an electric chair (which does literally nothing) when the evidence becomes too much to ignore, pretending that they did something noble.

Punish on the other hand posits a better perspective to the pedophilia contagion than just ignorance and electric chairs. the lyrics (at least to me) imply that pedophelic abusers are not genetically predestined (predisposed ≠ predestined), but rather created by poor environments, abuse incurred to oneself by other pedophiles, and a kneejerk culture that wholly alienates potential pedos who havent abused yet and want help to fix their urges. pedophilia is *very* often cyclical, having a child abused by a pedophilia will become a pedophile who abuses another. none of these rationale excuses their actions and means they shouldnt be put in prison, but it is important to talk about and doesnt "minimize the childs abuse". emphasis should always be put on prevention of abuse, not belated performative justice, and by researching pedophiles from an analytical mostly-non-biased perspective, and not a kneejerk "kill on sight!!!" mentality is the way to do that. 

idgaf what Ethel or Melanie drew/released when they were 19, I listen to both of them because I appreciate the art they’re releasing today
 
even with the rape allegations against Melanie, I still listen to her bc her music is good and lowkey that’s all I care abt when it comes to singers im not invested in like Lana 

>a LITERAL CHILD!
<a chibified version of her sketchbook OC who is a 19 year old man
 
do you know the definitions of "literal" and "child"?

were you not on the internet in the 2010's when chibi/kawaii character torture was a big thing in emo/goth art spaces? ethel did not invent the idea of putting cutified cartoons in gore/bdsm situations for her own perverted satisfaction lmao. like, you can think its weird but its not pedophilic, she was just copying an edgy trend which itself was also never pedophilic.
 
and again, it is a *drawing* of a *19 year old* who does not even look like a child (children do not have large genitalia, defined musculature, broad shoulders, piercings, etc...). the drawing simply has a big head bc its a drawn caricature and I guess you believe big cartoon heads has to mean child. sorry ig?
 
also melanie raped someone lolol, shockingly, a drawing is not worse than rape.

you can't tell him he's reaching (not that i fully disagree) while claiming she was drawing nsfw art of a child when that's your nasty interpretation lol. it's clearly art of an original character, not a child in any form with a slightly edgy caption that was posted -eight- years ago
 
this is like the 3rd mess brought up in a month and at this point it's just confusing. none of you like her or wanna hear an explanation that stops you from finding her problematic so why continue to discuss her instead of not coming to her thread? 

>a LITERAL CHILD!
<a chibified version of her sketchbook OC who is a 19 year old man
 
do you know the definitions of "literal" and "child"?

>a LITERAL CHILD!
<a chibified version of her sketchbook OC who is a 19 year old man
 
do you know the definitions of "literal" and "child"?