BLURRYFACE 1,713 Posted December 10, 2017 https://twitter.com/Beats1/status/939943089359216643 Unlock It (f/Kim Petras & Jay Park) premiering tomorrow Kim Petras & Jay Park OMG YES 0 Quote ❤xo Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
fkacowboy 326 Posted December 10, 2017 this confirms she did unlock it literally less than 3 months ago.. I'm smelling rushed mixtape her lyrics include "i wanna get fucked up" and "wanna make yo bottle pop" so idk what makes y'all think it takes her so long to make these songs. the production is what takes time, and since SOPHIE and her make magic together quite easily, it makes sense that it doesn't take that long for her to put out songs. she makes simple bops that are fun and catchy. they're not big concepts that reflect her inner demons or something lmao. it's not rushed imo is all i'm sayin 7 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wraith 7,277 Posted December 10, 2017 ok this photo slays https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DQuEwPlXkAADR3S.jpg 5 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
lonely lonely night 4,968 Posted December 10, 2017 y'all i hate to say it but the more i think about the title "pop 2" the cringier it gets 3 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Party Party 3,532 Posted December 10, 2017 y'all i hate to say it but the more i think about the title "pop 2" the cringier it gets I agree....why "Pop 2"? what does it even mean??? 2 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
lonely lonely night 4,968 Posted December 10, 2017 I agree....why "Pop 2"? what does it even mean??? i know charli's all about like embracing pop music but the tongue in cheek use of the word "pop" in the title is a little much, especially when it's just the word pop and then the number 2. the 2 likely comes from the fact that it's a followup to n1a and her second mixtape this year but it's a lazy title if you ask me. and i agree it makes no sense. she could have at least been clever about it and recycled the name too cute 1 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
LonelyHeart 5,980 Posted December 11, 2017 i know charli's all about like embracing pop music but the tongue in cheek use of the word "pop" in the title is a little much, especially when it's just the word pop and then the number 2. the 2 likely comes from the fact that it's a followup to n1a and her second mixtape this year but it's a lazy title if you ask me. and i agree it makes no sense. she could have at least been clever about it and recycled the name too cute"Too Cute" cover was fanmade and fake as hell sis. Even though the colors are wonderful 0 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
champagnecigarettes 1,566 Posted December 11, 2017 Imagine getting 2 mixtapes + dozens of leaks and a good number of collabs all in one year and still managing to complain about something as trivial as a mixtape title lol we love self sabotaging here at chorliboards 16 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
lonely lonely night 4,968 Posted December 11, 2017 "Too Cute" cover was fanmade and fake as hell sis. Even though the colors are wonderful would love to hear your source on this Imagine getting 2 mixtapes + dozens of leaks and a good number of collabs all in one year and still managing to complain about something as trivial as a mixtape title lol we love self sabotaging here at chorliboards nobody is complaining, it's a discussion. charli releasing a bunch of music means i'm forbidden from having an opinion on the title of her new mixtape???? ok sis 1 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BeautifulAnywhere 5,413 Posted December 11, 2017 I always thought "Pop 2" was a play on words. I thought this since pop rhymes with bop so since N1A was a bop it'd be like pop bop 2. Or like a way of saying "bop 2 this" 1 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BabyBlue 677 Posted December 11, 2017 It's No Angel (1) Pop (2) "album title" 3 It's No Angel (1) Pop (2) "album title" 3 0 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
LonelyHeart 5,980 Posted December 11, 2017 would love to hear your source on thisThe "Hacker" told us during Discord + showed us the original shoot meant for XCX3 (which is the one with blue background that leaked a few weeks ago together with N1a shoot) 0 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
HEARTCORE 18,969 Posted December 11, 2017 I think some of you are overthinking the title a bit 13 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
lonely lonely night 4,968 Posted December 11, 2017 The "Hacker" told us during Discord + showed us the original shoot meant for XCX3 (which is the one with blue background that leaked a few weeks ago together with N1a shoot) was there a cover from that shoot that leaked? those pics were used for promo. what about the too cute cover indicates that it was fanmade? 0 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BabyBlue 677 Posted December 11, 2017 Or it was in the same year and she always planned two mix tapes She's probs trying to make us forget Sucker happened. 0 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
glitch diva 2,906 Posted December 11, 2017 "Too Cute" cover was fanmade and fake as hell sis. Even though the colors are wonderful the photo isn't fanmade 1 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Golden 1,737 Posted December 11, 2017 The "Hacker" told us during Discord + showed us the original shoot meant for XCX3 (which is the one with blue background that leaked a few weeks ago together with N1a shoot) this is so WRONG lmao. these are 2 different shoots and the too cute picture is a part of one of them 1 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
AKA Lizzy Grant 2,238 Posted December 11, 2017 i know charli's all about like embracing pop music but the tongue in cheek use of the word "pop" in the title is a little much, especially when it's just the word pop and then the number 2. the 2 likely comes from the fact that it's a followup to n1a and her second mixtape this year but it's a lazy title if you ask me. and i agree it makes no sense. she could have at least been clever about it and recycled the name too cute I forget who tweeted it but someone who worked on it implied that it means the second version of pop. For instance, it goes iPhone 5, 6, 7...etc. Pop 2. edit: It was umru (https://twitter.com/umru_/status/938550793543847936) 6 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BeepBeep 258 Posted December 11, 2017 Dancing on tabletops, Champagne bottles go Pop2® I don't really care about the title of the mixtape as long as it's full of bops tbh. Edit: It could mean next-level pop, something she's always been talking about. 5 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Joon 259 Posted December 11, 2017 too cute was just a booklet pic it wasnt the cover nor the title lmfao 1 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites