howiet1971

You are right. I have allowed myself to get riled and sink to the level of maturity clearly evident on this forum. And for that I am responsible as I didn't have to let the attacks or passive aggressive comments irritate me. I shall leave you all to your virtual world and virtual friendships. Adieu.

But u r a 'rude member; you're an expandable clitoris apparently. Lol

Salvatore has done nothing to get banned. She hasn't been rude. Elle is welcome to ban me of she feels that I warrant that.

What long words did i use lol? I thought I kept it simple.

I have no 'friends' on this forum, the others do. I have no problem with you being a sycophant to them. You have ignored all their responses from the word go and focussed on mine. But thats ok.

Yawn

Yet this was ok...play the victim. I'm sure it's something u do well.

So it appears. The irony. There are a few nice ones but you know I don't want to get used to people treating people this way. But as I've said before. Karma doesnt pay on money.

Thank you. This is the nastiest forum i think I've ever been a member of. I thought the monsters were nasty! This is something rlse.

But I'm not entitled. You see... I put in the effort! I didn't just rock up. I didn't expect to get to anything for nothing. I put in the time. What's entitled about that? All I did was come here and ask if anyone could support me if you agreed with me, not expect a torrent of abuse from a bunch a vile queens. You don't have to agree with me but to sling shit says so much more about u than it does me. Thank you for checking in though love.

Say what you want love; just prove your capacity for hate and spite. Let it all out! Do it. Lol

What don't you take your probably rancid hooded expandable clitoris and shove it where the sun don't shine . You'd think for someone who 'feels hopeless' you'd be a bit nicer. I'll tell u something. You feel hopeless cos you're clearly a rude twat who only has virtual friends. Work on your manners and maybe people will start to like you outside of the www. It's not for you to tell me what's reasonable. You didn't have my experience. And those examples I gave were legal until someone challenged them. You are just too dumb to understand that I was not comparing those examples to my exeperince bit simply pointing out that just because something is the way it is, doesn't make it right. But you dont want to hear that or accept that because your clearly enjoying opposing my point of view.

.

Oh I'd love for you to say that to my face. I would like to thank those who maturely supported my complaint whether they agreed with it or not. As for the vile princesses who frequently attempt to bully people on this forum (I've seen it a lot) under the guise of "being dirext" (aka being a c*nt) karma doesn't pay in money. I'm bored of you now.

Thank you for the mature response. And you're right, they have little competition so service is irrelevant. But the rest is ok love? You have missed the point because you wrapped up in your sycophancy

Is the rest ok then Love?

Thank you for the articulate and pleasant response. My argument isn't with Lana or her team by the way; I was just trying to find someone to speak with about it. (though being told they didn't care was disappointing).

Exactly! It was a shambles. But if you listen to the people above, tough luck! You're missing the point. Because something is the way it is, doesn't mean it should be. But you don't care about the point.. even if you disagree with it.

Does that make: 'No Blacks' venues ok? Their venue, their rules. Or 'no gays' b&b's ok? Their venue, their rules. Or 'no women allowed' ok? Their venue, their rules. Or 'female circumcision' ok? Their religion, their rules. Or 'no rights for gays' Their country, their rules. Those examples are more serious of course, but just cos something is the way it is, doesn't make it right. Things can be changed. And if not, you can at the very least express your opinion without being vilified.

I don't care if you don't agree with me in any way - we are all entitled to our opinions. It's your attitude princess. In life I fight for what I care about, some is trivial, some is not; you don't now me. If we just let everything we disagreed with go under the guise of 'first world problems' (which i agree it is) then everyone would be shit on from a great height. You need to check the way you speak to people. You call it 'being direct'; there's a big difference between being direct and being an arsehole. Thanks for the support Wilhelm; and you're absolutely right. I'm just not used to the way some people talk to each other on here.

Actually O2 Brixton tweeted that we'd all going in at the same time.

I'm 46. I'm 46 - I've been going to concerts since I was 16 years old. I have NEVER experienced this before. If you think that's acceptable, then that's your opinion. If you think having your having a certain network provider should be placed over someone who has made effort then look to yourself. I was on my own and i did not know anything about o2 people being allowed in first over people who had queued for hours. Because you got in early, you are alright. I'm alright Jack! F*ck the rest of you. There are people on here who said that even though they are with o2 they thought it was unfair. And no need to be so damn rude. Imagine I said something like "shes fucking naming unreleased, singing them and talking about calling fans im gonna cry" - and I responded with "GET A GRIP, GET A LIFE AND GET OVER IT."

THIS IS A DISGRACE Many people queued for hours to get the best view; I personally queued for nearly 8 before the doors opened. Many queued for much longer and some overnight. We all do what we can and put in the effort to get to the front. UNFORTUNATELY o2 priority customers were let in before anyone else, no matter what time they arrived!!!! So if you rocked up at 18.45, you got in before people who had been there all day. I have been complaining about this to all sorts of people for days and when I spoke to the (very arrogant) manager 'Nigel' of Brixton Academy, he said as o2 pay masses of £'s in sponsorship, they can have whatever priorities they like and it was tough luck. (Lana's tour management people who sign the contracts in the UK told me they didn't care!) Now if you had o2 and got in, then you are lucky; this complaint is not in any way about you or Lana of course but about the CORPORATE BULLSHIT that is changing the face of concert going. Knowing Lana the way we do, there is no way she would be happy about her fans being treated like this. The fans can no longer get to the front (or as close as possible) simply by putting in the effort. Fans are now discriminated against depending on what mobile company they are with and as o2 own lots of venues, this affects lots of concerts and lots of people! Nigel said he let 30 people in as they had been there overnight. At least that's something, but there were hundreds more who made a lot of effort too. I accept priority allows people a special o2 presale sometimes and also a 'VIP' bar but this is unacceptable. It turns out that the o2 tweeted everyone would go in at the same time. (Proof on my tweet) I am asking for people to please support my tweet by sharing / responding to it - I am not the only person on this forum pissed off about it. This is about what is right, not about whether you are happy you got in early. Sometimes you have to take a stand even if it gets you know Thank you. xxx

u the Best!!!! Please go to my Twitter and reply to the tweet I just sent and back me up. My Twitter is https://twitter.com/HowardTrigg/status/890699860671946752 . Anyone else who is pissed off REF priorities please do the same. X Could you please complain on my post for me? I know you were lucky to get in but you very unselfishly said you thought it was unfair. xxx https://twitter.com/HowardTrigg/status/890699860671946752

---