Jump to content

Mer

Supporters 2.0
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Content Count

    8,108

  • Joined

Posts posted by Mer

  2. Posted

    1 minute ago, crazyforyou said:

    he didn’t know he couldn’t advocate for a communtiy he’s not apart of :oprah3:

     

    no that's literally what he's saying idk why Taylor has Gay Truthers when this man is literally like "I identify as straight but..." in every damn interview LOL. I mean good for him. I wouldn't date him if he was. But still, good for you Matty. 

    2

  3. Posted

    1 minute ago, taco truck said:

    It’s Matty, and she’s not outing him. He’s talked about his sexuality a lot and is like bi but also seems to only date women (publicly). I don’t think she would put something like that in a song if he wasn’t comfortable/open with it. 

     

    i'm pretty sure he identifies as straight - he said so in his Chicken Shop Interview last year. 

    1

  4. Posted

    7 minutes ago, crazyforyou said:

    trueee me and my friend were talking about it and i was saying it might be matty because he has made out with a guy on stage and i feel like in 2024 we dont all need to publicly come out. or did she just completely out joe. out of all the lore on the album cososom and peter are the ones im most curious about though

     

    it's also interesting because Sam could be a boys name or a girls name. i def think it could be Matty, but honestly, I don't think she'd really go there? IDK. It would seem a bit low - I know there's no need to publicly come out anymore - but I also don't think she'd be so brazen about someone else's (especially an ex's) sexuality? In this case I feel like she may want any speculation to purely be about her and not about Joe/Matty (obviously there should be no speculation at all though, I think that's her biggest hope LOL). 

     

    I need to properly read the "Peter" lyrics but I think that one's basically about Matty Healy promising to come get her 10 years later in 2014, and royal fucking it up in 2024. 

    3

  5. Posted

    Just now, crazyforyou said:

    chloe or sam or marcus

     

    ok thisssssss one is iffy bc like who is she outing if not herself...like i'm not even gonna go there bc i love the song but WHAT is she trying to say with "your hologram stumbled into my apartment/hands in the hair of somebody in the darkness/named Chloe Or Sam Or Sophia or Marcus" 

    1

  6. Posted

    1 hour ago, WaitForLife said:

    Gaylors are stronger than ever!

    :oopna:


    I fuck you not I saw a gaylor say TTPD is about Phoebe Bridgers in FULL seriousness. Their entire world has been turned upside down bc their entire narrative was “if Taylor’s so happy with Joe - why is she writing all these lustful songs?” And now that Taylor’s basically confirmed them to be about Matty Healy, who she’s waited for since 2014, they’re in panic. 

    4

  7. Posted

    Current album ranking 

     

    Red

    TTPD [standard + anthology as one album] (recency bias)

    1989

    folklore 

    Speak Now

    Midnights (her most inconsistent for me, but the songs that hit hit)

    evermore 

    Lover (Cruel Summer carries)

    Reputation 

    Fearless 

    Taylor Swift

     

     

    2

  9. Posted

    5 minutes ago, The Siren said:

    i think id be mad too. sounds goin viral on things like Tiktok is what leads people's attention to the songs


    Well…UMG makes money off Taylor’s success and she owns her own music, so it was fully within her right.

     

    The only thing was, I think UMG wanted her to hold rank so they could co-negotiate for more money for all the music UMG owns, but Taylor probably decided she was gonna do what’s best for her in this business. 

    2

  10. Posted

    i feel like UMG is mad at her over the TikTok thing. I just saw a reddit post that said the merch was not distributed by UMG and instead by TaylorNation. I have a feeling she's going to break away. 

    3

  11. Posted

    Anyways 140million on Spotify on Day 3 is pretty crazy. I totally figured she’d be under 100 million by day 2 with how inaccessible this album appeared to me. I’m guessing it’ll taper to below 100m by tomorrow 

    2

  12. Posted

    1 minute ago, DemonMic2003 said:

    To be fair, there’s 5 Jack tracks on it compared to 1989 which had 3… and one of them is getaway car.

     

    edit- also who knows what’s in the vault 


    ya OOW was a highlight. Christopher Rowe is just not that good 

    1

  13. Posted

    Just now, Cherry Blossom said:

    Ok i just remembered anti-hero is about her being scared of fans getting tired of her scheming and leaving her for it and now i feel bad :krylie:


    I don’t think the fans are leaving tho. The album is still outperforming midnights by a good margin - and even the GP doesn’t seem that annoyed by her. It seems to be just the critics and Stan twitter 

    5

  15. Posted

    7 minutes ago, littleredpartydress said:

    Sputnik 48ing this :rip: she’s kind of in her critical backlash era and her retweeting all of the 10/10 reviews is sort of … :bebe:

     

    obviously will be a massive commercial success but will be interesting to see what this does long term because of how negative the discourse around this is outside of fan circles 


    Sputnik gave her a 4.5/5 (90/100) tho. Her most acclaimed album by them: https://www.sputnikmusic.com/review/88481/Taylor-Swift-The-Tortured-Poets-Department-Anthology/

    2

  16. Posted

    27 minutes ago, Cherry Blossom said:

    it fails because it can’t review pop music properly / is flawed in other areas.


    oh sorry - quality of reviews is absolutely not why I think they failed lmao. I think they failed bc they suck at SEO and couldn’t get ad money bc of it. 
     

    They have no ability to build a solid audience. I visit their site quite a bit given my love of music, and never have I been prompted to give them my email address for any sort of newsletter or “recapturing” campaign. 
     

    Since all their content is also ungated, AFAIK, they also have no supplementary revenue stream. 
     

    The only spikes in their audience (I just checked) is when they publish a controversial review on an album with a huge fan base, and that’s a horrible SEO strategy for long term success/bringing advertisers imo. 

    2

  18. Posted

    A negative review gets more clicks. Outrage gets more clicks. I work in SEO, this is textbook - and Pitchfork as a platform failed anyways. They’ll be folded into GQ by end of year. 

    8

  19. Posted

    8 minutes ago, taco truck said:

    *insert halsey tweet here*

    this being lower than midnights is ridiculous, ttpd should’ve gotten a 7.5 plus with midnights somewhere in the high 6’s, but whatever :trisha4:


    not to be mean, but I assume whoever doesn’t understand the genius of this album has had the most boring romantic life ever.  

    4

  20. Posted

    The Gaylors are having a meltdown bc every song they argued could be about Karlie Kloss can by the same logic now be argued to be about Matty Healy LMAOOOOOO

    2

  22. Posted

    Just now, fl0r1dakil0s said:

     

    my message would be MUCH meaner 


    I honestly am less mad about her posting the story than I am at the thought of her being on Lasso 😭😭💀

    4

  24. Posted

    1 minute ago, taco truck said:

    And where did you get this screenshot from? :derpna4:


    ya hang on - she didn’t post this on her story so how did he get it…unless..

    4

  25. Posted

    2 minutes ago, fl0r1dakil0s said:

    These Taylor fans r RUTHLESS

     

    IMG-2304.jpg?format=webp&quality=lossless

     

    She should log into LB sometime if she thinks this is bad :hillary:

    and while I don’t condone hopping into anyone’s DMs (go touch grass), I can’t condemn it either bc ppl do be nuts and don’t poke those bears 

     

    (also let's call a spade a spade, this is clearly a Lana fan as well) 

    4
×
×
  • Create New...