Jump to content

lazybooklet

Members
  • Content Count

    341
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by lazybooklet


  1. Exactly, and Chuck had nothing to do with the graphics either. The actual image she shot isn't that bad, but it's just not really iconic enough for an album cover art imo. Something like the HBTB cover would have SLAYED as the album cover.

    I think that's what we usually expect from Lana's album cover (remember UV and Paradise album cover) - the photo will always -seem- to be not iconic enough. Maybe those photo meant something to her? Maybe she's trying to say something from those subpar pictures? Maybe it fits the album's musical style? I think I get that - and I kind of understand why and think that the HM album cover is the best of that photoshoot


  2. Concept albums are like operas. (some are called rock operas, but both names convey the same thing.)

    A connection from 1st song to the finale in a specifically placed order and where most songs are almost meaningless unless heard in the order presented telling the story

     

    (What is Elton's "Someone saved my life tonight", if one didn't know the entire album and the meaning of the album "Captain Fantastic and the Brown Dirt Cowboy"

    Out of Elton's 40 or so albums, 3 were concept.

     

    Bowie had 2 concept albums

    Beatles had Sgt. Pepper's but none of the others (before that most rock/pop/soul were single based and people bought 45s more than albums)

    Beach Boys Pet sounds was. All their other albums were a few singles and filler.

    The Monkees album "Head" was a concept album, but none of the others

    Stevie Wonder Songs in the Key of Life

     

    The legendary Klaus Nomi transcends the barriers between rock and opera and concept albums.

     

    There is a reason Lana says Ultraviolence starts with Cruel World and ends with The other woman (and the rest are bonus hits.)

    Most of the 300 plus songs not on records that Lana wrote are not part of concept albums, they are songs (and why most of the more recent are not part of any album itself.)

    Ultraviolence would have been regardless of the using of Dan Auerbach for production

     

    If one don't see it, one don't see it. That's my opinion.

    It's a story. Without one song, it would be like a chapter was missing.

     

    I totally agree with you. Lana definitely had a vision if she chose Dan Auerbach to produce UV. She was looking for a alt-rock sound and he could deliver it. Either way - UV would have been more or less the same.

     

    I'm an album person as well, and I truly appreciate how Lana ties things up beautifully in each album and each tracks. Each of them have an distinguishable sound, that pull me on different journeys. You get to hear the sound you enjoy for an hour, not 5 minutes and the artist get the chance to truly express their vision to you. 


  3. Maybe there isn't meant to have a concrete meaning for HBTB. Maybe the song is about a man but the video is about the media, or the song is both a man and the media. The ambiguity actually makes the song better. Maybe Lana thought something like a helicopter and a gun would be ~aesthetic~ but not meant to be anything deep. But we can all agree that the video is beautiful ~artistically~, unlike generic MVs nowadays

×
×
  • Create New...