Say Yes to Heaven 27,435 Posted January 4, 2023 its the fact that if UFB leaked a little earlier it would've def been on BB, like the leakers fumbled it 30 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
misslonaxo 1,733 Posted January 4, 2023 1 minute ago, kaliuchis said: okay but the M U S I C M A F I A at the end adds too much to the song NO LIKE??? It's kinda fitting at the end there... very moody and dark LOLLL 7 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
cherryblossoms 10,405 Posted January 4, 2023 11 minutes ago, Nikki Lane said: Speaking of 1949 unedited. Where's Every Man Gets His Wish v2 unedited? @111 5 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Dark Angel 201,020 Posted January 4, 2023 9 minutes ago, Say Yes to Heaven said: its the fact that if UFB leaked a little earlier it would've def been on BB, like the leakers fumbled it i'm very thankful they didn't leak it later if that's the case 2 Quote ─── ⋆⋅ ♰ ⋅⋆ ─── Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
misslonaxo 1,733 Posted January 4, 2023 2 minutes ago, lilac heaven said: the wildest part of it is that even if they lost the session or something, we literally have all of the stems for Cherry Blossom and NOTG, like the whole session leaked 😭 they could’ve gotten all of the stems back if they just looked a little harder Which is why i ended up taking the WAV files from those sessions and getting the loudness to match the rest of BB. It didn't take me that long either, cmon Polydor... 11 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
plastiscguy 63,430 Posted January 4, 2023 Something Real not being something actually real... Wow... Well, at least we can stop waiting! 19 Quote My rose garden dreams set on fire by fiends... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
IanadeIrey 61,916 Posted January 4, 2023 What is the point of editing unreleased songs before they are leaked - it is because the leakers want to maintain some sort of exclusivity of knowing the real version was only heard by a select few OR so that the leak can be traced back to them for credit’s sake (with edits being equivalent to tags)? 25 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Crazy Husband Thief 3,900 Posted January 4, 2023 Just now, Say Yes to Heaven said: its the fact that if UFB leaked a little earlier it would've def been on BB, like the leakers fumbled it I doubt she would have put a vocal duet with her ex on that album. I think the only reason she chose his collaborations was because they tied into the “home/garden” theme and the motherhood concept. Blue Banisters paints a picture of her Utopia. A quiet life with a reliable partner and children of her own, along with a real mother figure (maybe even becoming a mother figure herself) which to this day is an unfulfilled wish of hers. Fine China, I Can Fly and Yes to Heaven sort of lean more towards the side of being left at the altar or another failed relationship/engagement and I think she decided not to put them on there to focus on something else, something more hopeful. 7 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Say Yes to Heaven 27,435 Posted January 4, 2023 1 minute ago, IanadeIrey said: What is the point of editing unreleased songs before they are leaked - it is because the leakers want to maintain some sort of exclusivity of knowing the real version was only heard by a select few OR so that the leak can be traced back to them for credit’s sake (with edits being equivalent to tags)? its so they can keep that tiniest bit of exclusivity to themselves 18 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
West Coast 45,790 Posted January 4, 2023 So everything we knew prior to today is now either a semi-lie, or a semi-accurate truth huh 27 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Crazy Husband Thief 3,900 Posted January 4, 2023 1 minute ago, Say Yes to Heaven said: its so they can keep that tiniest bit of exclusivity to themselves Ruthless. 2 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
The Siren 30,517 Posted January 4, 2023 32 minutes ago, Say Yes to Heaven said: @BlackoutZone CARE TO CONFIRM MY THEORY ?!?!?! There is no version of 13 Beaches NOR Something Real (if that was ever even the title) that featured lyrics as "You took the-" like Eclipse says... I've rambled abt this theory sm in the past but I am hardset on my belief that he actually obtained stems that had only a certain number of seconds playing from the intro... Think about it - anytime he's mentioned Something Real, it's been only about the intro,,, showing the intro without the movie sample, saying it had horror strings (only the intro has really strong strings like that), etc.. NOW my belief is that, Eclipse heard "it took thir-" as we know thats how the song starts anyway.. he then mistook it as "You took the" and posted it as "You took the #SR" (Something Real) bc he was too giddy abt getting that (why would u post lyrics to something recorded literally the same day or week is beyond me) but yeah... it all makes so much sense when u put it together and I'm 100% believing it. @111 (this is eclipse right?) 1 Quote Last.FM | Discogs | JOYRIDE Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Deleted Member 23,727 Posted January 4, 2023 3 minutes ago, Say Yes to Heaven said: its so they can keep that tiniest bit of exclusivity to themselves this also must be why they leak songs in shit quality and i’m mad about it 12 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
plastiscguy 63,430 Posted January 4, 2023 Talking about cut/edited versions... And I apologize if this is stupid/has been discussed before but does Hollywood's Dead really end that abruptly? 4 Quote My rose garden dreams set on fire by fiends... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Dark Angel 201,020 Posted January 4, 2023 Just now, plastiscguy said: Talking about cut/edited versions... And I apologize if this is stupid/has been discussed before but does Hollywood's Dead really end that abruptly? yeah, at the very end you can hear lana say "cut!" 9 Quote ─── ⋆⋅ ♰ ⋅⋆ ─── Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
the ocean 67,597 Posted January 4, 2023 we need to do a leak strike sorry y'all but i don't want dark city or roses bloom for you if we are not getting it in at least 320 kbps unedited 11 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
hotshot2am 18,781 Posted January 4, 2023 2 minutes ago, lilac heaven said: this also must be why they leak songs in shit quality and i’m mad about it I still can't get over the fact that If I Die Young snippets leaked in crisp 320kbps and the full version only in low quality 15 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
GeminiLanaFan 48,869 Posted January 4, 2023 4 hours ago, TheBoss said: Finally someone was brave enough to say it! What a horrible track, I'm sorry... I’m also part of the the « I don’t like I Talk to Jesus » fan club 7 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
West Coast 45,790 Posted January 4, 2023 The irony of editing leaks just to retain some sort of exclusivety or keep tabs on who leaks what is the silliest thing—it's camp. 14 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Deleted Member 23,727 Posted January 4, 2023 1 minute ago, the ocean said: we need to do a leak strike sorry y'all but i don't want dark city or roses bloom for you if we are not getting it in at least 320 kbps unedited no because i’m heated i’m so tempted to find every insider on this website besides BOZ and honeymouns and 111 and ask them if they have 320kbps Fine China to spare 15 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites