NFR Metacritic/Review Thread

[Off To The Races 2010 demo pls 19,336]

Honeymoon deserves a 90

[Edelgard 1,849]

Politics

which all fell pretty flat

i love her and i'm sure she's a deep person but those songs weren't

her style is too poetic to be political. leave that to rap. 

[daytonadeath 3,597]

they should change the review that they posted for the guardian

[ilovetati 15,299]

they should change the review that they posted for the guardian

They’re not going to change it, but the LA Times one is definitely wrong.

[cooling85 11]

Paste Magazine (82/100):
https://www.pastemagazine.com/articles/2019/09/lana-del-rey-norman-fucking-rockwell-review.html

PopMatters (90/100):
https://www.popmatters.com/lana-del-rey-norman-rockwell-2640168009.html

[Cacciatore 19,347]

Paste Magazine (82/100):

https://www.pastemagazine.com/articles/2019/09/lana-del-rey-norman-fucking-rockwell-review.html

 

PopMatters (90/100):

https://www.popmatters.com/lana-del-rey-norman-rockwell-2640168009.html

 

COME THROUGH POP MATTERS 

[ilovetati 15,299]

Up to 88!!

[house of balloons 12,795]

Up to 88!!

it's what she deserves 

[ilovetati 15,299]

We need someone to come through with another 100 

 

Or for Metacritic to finally fix the LA Times score

[Marius 12,856]

We need someone to come through with another 100 

 

Or for Metacritic to finally fix the LA Times score

What's wrong with this score? I didn't pay attention apparently. 

[ilovetati 15,299]

What's wrong with this score? I didn't pay attention apparently. 

 

They raved the album and called it "dazzling," "stirring," "emotionally-risky," "gorgeous melodies that have never been more vidid (for the artist)," etc. There are zero critiques of the album.

 

It reads as a very clear rave, so it does not feel reflective of the review's spirit for the score to be as low as an 80 rather than a 100 (or 90, even).

 

Someone else should email them. I already tried.

[Marius 12,856]

 

They raved the album and called it "dazzling," "stirring," "emotionally-risky," "gorgeous melodies that have never been more vidid (for the artist)," etc. There are zero critiques of the album.

 

It reads as a very clear rave, so it does not feel reflective of the review's spirit for the score to be as low as an 80 rather than a 100 (or 90, even).

 

Someone else should email them. I already tried.

 

Do u have an e-mail? I will send them a message. 

[Beautiful Loser 49,666]

Omg, 88!

[ilovetati 15,299]

Do u have a e-mail? I will send them a message. 

 

editorial@metacritic.com

[CatchTheBreeze 1,682]

Up to 88!!

 

And meanwhile, "Lover" is down to a 79.

[enchaunted 106]

someone give her a 100 omg

 

when will its metascore be steady??

[house of balloons 12,795]

someone give her a 100 omg

 

when will its metascore be steady??

Honeymoon settled down after 30 reviews 

[capricoke 30]

i've been real busy with college and struggling to keep up but i yelled so hard when i saw the pitchfork score, gotta take time to read it carefully, and i'm so happy it got back to 88 but i really wish she could get that sweet 90, it's truly what she deserves

[ilovetati 15,299]

I'm so happy with the 88, but the publications left are some of the toughest ones towards her. The 405, Exclaim, Tiny Mix Tapes, Spin, Q Magazine, Under the Radar, Quietus, Record Collector, Uncut, Chicago Tribune (if he reviews, score will be low for sure), etc.

[DCooper 37,180]

How is Paste an 82? They called it an instant classic...