Terrence Loves Me Posted May 14, 2017 Posted May 14, 2017 Middle eastern time zone is GMT+3 sis what does that mean 1
naachoboy Posted May 14, 2017 Posted May 14, 2017 what time is it now in that place? (where the app came from)
Flowerbomb Posted May 14, 2017 Posted May 14, 2017 I'm reaching here... But remember when Lana tweeted the 'ingredients can be found online" post, and she used a cake emoji? What if that's a clue that she'll release the album on her birthday? Idk. 2
HEARTCORE Posted May 14, 2017 Posted May 14, 2017 sis what does that mean Add 3 hours to the time in London and you will have the time in the Middle East
latothemoon Posted May 14, 2017 Posted May 14, 2017 I'm expecting this song to be more acoustic since she said "I want to dig into the more acoustic side of the record" before it's out. Here for it 7
Terrence Loves Me Posted May 14, 2017 Posted May 14, 2017 I believe it's 5:37am in that place from the website
Stargirl Posted May 14, 2017 Posted May 14, 2017 I'm expecting this song to be more acoustic since she said "I want to dig into the more acoustic side of the record" before it's out. Here for it but she said that she was going to release some more anthemic music first, so I'd imagine that this would be one of those 1
Doll Harlow Posted May 14, 2017 Posted May 14, 2017 I wonder if this song is getting a video? You call me lavender, you call me sunshine.
naachoboy Posted May 14, 2017 Posted May 14, 2017 I believe it's 5:37am in that place from the website oh so like we should check in like 18 hrs or so 1
Terrence Loves Me Posted May 14, 2017 Posted May 14, 2017 oh so like we should check in like 18 hrs or so yeah i believe so, i'm so excited!!
Flowerbomb Posted May 14, 2017 Posted May 14, 2017 I wonder if this song is getting a video? I think it will. I think LFL was the Terrence Loves You of this era (since that didn't have a video). 1
latothemoon Posted May 14, 2017 Posted May 14, 2017 If this song comes with the pre order I'll be so happy, we'll finally know the (real) date and tracklist 3
Lust Posted May 14, 2017 Posted May 14, 2017 Omg youesa so close like I will translate in th mod I ing ADD ME ON SNAPCBAT EVEEJOM MY HAWRNAME IS ELLIJAH NO OTS ELLIJAY WLINAY WLLIA ELLIEAY ELLIDAY ELLIJAY ^^^^ the last onw Iconic 2
Stargirl Posted May 14, 2017 Posted May 14, 2017 Omg youesa so close like I will translate in th mod I ing ADD ME ON SNAPCBAT EVEEJOM MY HAWRNAME IS ELLIJAH NO OTS ELLIJAY WLINAY WLLIA ELLIEAY ELLIDAY ELLIJAY ^^^^ the last onw I love our mod Ellijah 6
Veinsineon Posted May 14, 2017 Posted May 14, 2017 ok unpopular opinion but : when she was interviewing on BBC1 abt LFL and she talked about Yosemite and how it's a good representation of the ACOUSTIC SIDE of the record, i got a little bugged, i just cant see how acoustics will fit in on this record. i mean BAR was good....demo sounding. I cant see how it'll go from Love to LFL to some acoustic guitar one take song like Yosemite. /: i wont be dissapointed though. ive been a fa since 2012 and i've always been skeptical of new directions she takes so ig this should be nice 3
mrborntolose Posted May 14, 2017 Posted May 14, 2017 honestly lana never said that the songs were entirely acoustic. she implied some songs had acoustic elements. probably like how archeticture is. that's what i think she meant by it 3
Doll Harlow Posted May 14, 2017 Posted May 14, 2017 ok unpopular opinion but : when she was interviewing on BBC1 abt LFL and she talked about Yosemite and how it's a good representation of the ACOUSTIC SIDE of the record, i got a little bugged, i just cant see how acoustics will fit in on this record. i mean BAR was good....demo sounding. I cant see how it'll go from Love to LFL to some acoustic guitar one take song like Yosemite. /: i wont be dissapointed though. ive been a fa since 2012 and i've always been skeptical of new directions she takes so ig this should be nice I'm hoping it will give me Lizzy Grant/May Jailer vibes 1 You call me lavender, you call me sunshine.
baddisease Posted May 14, 2017 Posted May 14, 2017 ok unpopular opinion but : when she was interviewing on BBC1 abt LFL and she talked about Yosemite and how it's a good representation of the ACOUSTIC SIDE of the record, i got a little bugged, i just cant see how acoustics will fit in on this record. i mean BAR was good....demo sounding. I cant see how it'll go from Love to LFL to some acoustic guitar one take song like Yosemite. /: i wont be dissapointed though. ive been a fa since 2012 and i've always been skeptical of new directions she takes so ig this should be nice What if it's a double album? One CD like Love/Lust for Life and another like Yosemite? 1
HunterSThompson Posted May 14, 2017 Posted May 14, 2017 I've really tried to keep from coming here because anytime something new (or slightly different from whatever expectation y'all had) happens, everyone on here has a complete meltdown. BUT now I'm here and I would like to say that I'm super excited for this song and I happen to love the title! Of course I'd rather the "-" be a "/" in the title or just get rid of "Coachella - " all together, but I'm not so bothered by it that I'm going to change it in my iTunes library when it's released Why would you change an artist's intended style just to have it fit into your own aesthetic lens? It just seems frivolous to me, I suppose. On a different note, sort of, what do you gorls think it's gonna sound like? I'm getting some serious Brooklyn Baby vibes from the title alone 6
LanaCharts Posted May 14, 2017 Posted May 14, 2017 'Coachella - Woodstock in My Mind'... hhhmmm, sounds like an uptempo song produced by Max Martin/Benny Blanco 2
Recommended Posts