111

an essay from 111

i think it was the trailer for that movie or documentary or whatever that included beautiful people

sky ferreira you will never be famous

best song of all time now leak it

i decide to have one (1) picture after all these years...

not my pic and sky stanning

i'm a legend and who are you supposed to be? slayyyter avi getting brave

ntmt being a cute moment in 2013 got to her even though it's not even that good of an album y'all gassed her up and it got to her head and she started acting like a brat. you can tell she thinks she is so much better than everyone by the way she treats her staff, her audience and her peers. firing video editors and sound engineers, blaming her label for everything, the dozens of lies and broken promises to her fans and shading other artists publicly when she thinks they stole from her. and fine maybe that halsey video is similar and nasty cherry was an entire rip off but she didn't invent any of that shit (if you ask me it's projection, she literally takes her songs from others but can't stand whenever anyone does something remotely similar to her shit). she could have stayed humble and professional and worked on her music but she had to be a brat and make shady posts, did she win? no. nasty cherry was always irrelevant, halsey was right about her and did she also come for charli and burn that bridge when she found out about charli's nasty cherry involvement or am i making that up? either way my point stands. i hate the tumblr fags and pitchfork for gassing her up a decade ago when she was never that girl. NEVER

the girl has been late to every show she had this year with sound issues and car crashes! capitol rightfully doesn't want to fund any of her shenanigans and waste money on her to get NOTHING back. i'm BEGGING all of you to read and understand this... she complained that capitol asked her to shoot the don't forget music video on an iphone even though many A-list artists from lady gaga to selena gomez has iphone shot music videos. idk if the video ended up being shot on film camera or an iphone, but miss thing fired the video editor and ended up not releasing the music video. if you were her label, would you want to fund her next mv or anything expensive she wants to do??? ofc billion dollar music industry labels are greedy capitalist assholes, but she thinks she deserves million dollar budgets for doing fuck all, making zero profit and completing NOTHING. she wants all that money so she can buy expensive directors and editors and songs because she still believes she is that shit for lucking out with NTMT, that she is some sort of a creative mastermind. ENTITLED SPOILED LA BRAT!! if she was anything of a creative genius artist she would need ZERO DOLLARS to make and release art. they don't trust you or have faith in you to fund you because you are untrustworthy, dishonest and a liar. FUCK OFF SKY.

every time i have to read a post or comment acting like any of this is her label's doing i get furious

i trust my ears more than people with marina and the weeknd avis just calling the album "bad" and "mid" with random negative scores and no proper reviews... like please. "i want to like it so bad but i can't"... yeah i'd rather read paid reviews

reputa and lover were definitely too much to turn casual listeners into stans, the bulk of those albums were made for people who were already into her very much so, folklore and evermore definitely fixed her brand and standing with the GP gaining her a lot of respect but again they were too much to chew on for people who enjoyed some songs from her but thought she was trying too hard and doing too much, they were really heavy and narrative based albums... ofc all of these mentioned albums gained fans but MIDNIGHTS finds the perfect ground for being easily digestible for everyone while also making sure it's not a cringey fan servicey mess to turn off people who's checking it out, she has found the perfect balance for that! making it so appealing to everyone from the casual listening gaise and girlies to the GP and even the critics who can't help but to ACCLAIM this masterpiece and of course the swiffers. it's a record that could be listened across generations, across genders and sexual orientations, across casual listeners and pretentious music snobs...

this album is excellent

missing some stuff

idk who said midnites is worse than lover but they lied major

some of these are from the new album some are really old and only intended to be pitched (they are really bad) and some are pang outtakes

flop

the problem wasn't that they were included, people were mad because she used youtube rips and not actual masters. they should have been reproduced/finalised like Thunder, which people wasn't mad at and enjoyed the inclusion of with the new production. three 2013 songs ripped from youtube and thrown on the album is lazy. but this is definitely a different topic than what we were talking about anyways

i know you are wanting a clear answer but there's so much nuance and complexity to this sitation. there's already confusion and uncertainty around which leaks she was talking about on her videos, if her devices were stolen don't you think MOST if not ALL of her recent music was stolen? at that point, does it matter if the file actually comes from some other hack or from her laptop? those files don't exist in isolation, she probably thinks they all came from her and it is upsetting even though they may have been obtained prior to the theft and from somewhere else... again using crazy for you as an example, if it were to leak now and she was made aware of it, of course it's not for an upcoming album but she would still see that and think it's connected to the theft if she had it on her laptop or her drive(s). so how do you decide if it's ok or not to listen to it? we know it's not from the theft, we know it's not for an upcoming album, but she might believe it came from the theft and feel bad that her songs and personal files are out there... would you still feel guilty or not? there's no clear cut answer to this situation...

not the gays trying to absolve themselves of guilt and to find a moral high ground while being completely hypocritical... no one is going to give you an "approved listening list" are y'all crazy they are ALL stolen and hacked and scammed material... stop with the mind gymnastics and decide for yourself at your own discretion if you wanna listen to something or not. what if she comes out and asks you to not listen to stolen songs from her producers/team? that crazy for you is on the next album it was stolen from her in 2020 or some shit (hypothetically since i know some of you will take it seriously...)? we gon sit and pretend like y'all didn't make 500 pages for that song and didn't beg day and night for it to be leaked? have your own ethics and values please, if lana being rightfully upset and asking us to respect her privacy and not listen to songs cause you to go unstable and come out questioning "uhh which stolen and hacked material is OK for me to listen to!" then maybe you shouldn't be listening to any of them in the first place...

it's in the thread title

this can only lead to one thing

the difference between sky and grimes is as simple as this tweet:

if i may have a couple of notes: we dont call her a crackhead or junkie any more cause it triggers some girlies and they start spamming the report button until Ellen has to get involved and lock the thread for like 5 weeks and i can't have another snapchat from her (looking gorgeous!) and DMs from mods telling me to chill but that i'm right about her