111

some of these are from the new album some are really old and only intended to be pitched (they are really bad) and some are pang outtakes

flop

the problem wasn't that they were included, people were mad because she used youtube rips and not actual masters. they should have been reproduced/finalised like Thunder, which people wasn't mad at and enjoyed the inclusion of with the new production. three 2013 songs ripped from youtube and thrown on the album is lazy. but this is definitely a different topic than what we were talking about anyways

i know you are wanting a clear answer but there's so much nuance and complexity to this sitation. there's already confusion and uncertainty around which leaks she was talking about on her videos, if her devices were stolen don't you think MOST if not ALL of her recent music was stolen? at that point, does it matter if the file actually comes from some other hack or from her laptop? those files don't exist in isolation, she probably thinks they all came from her and it is upsetting even though they may have been obtained prior to the theft and from somewhere else... again using crazy for you as an example, if it were to leak now and she was made aware of it, of course it's not for an upcoming album but she would still see that and think it's connected to the theft if she had it on her laptop or her drive(s). so how do you decide if it's ok or not to listen to it? we know it's not from the theft, we know it's not for an upcoming album, but she might believe it came from the theft and feel bad that her songs and personal files are out there... would you still feel guilty or not? there's no clear cut answer to this situation...

not the gays trying to absolve themselves of guilt and to find a moral high ground while being completely hypocritical... no one is going to give you an "approved listening list" are y'all crazy they are ALL stolen and hacked and scammed material... stop with the mind gymnastics and decide for yourself at your own discretion if you wanna listen to something or not. what if she comes out and asks you to not listen to stolen songs from her producers/team? that crazy for you is on the next album it was stolen from her in 2020 or some shit (hypothetically since i know some of you will take it seriously...)? we gon sit and pretend like y'all didn't make 500 pages for that song and didn't beg day and night for it to be leaked? have your own ethics and values please, if lana being rightfully upset and asking us to respect her privacy and not listen to songs cause you to go unstable and come out questioning "uhh which stolen and hacked material is OK for me to listen to!" then maybe you shouldn't be listening to any of them in the first place...

it's in the thread title

this can only lead to one thing

the difference between sky and grimes is as simple as this tweet:

if i may have a couple of notes: we dont call her a crackhead or junkie any more cause it triggers some girlies and they start spamming the report button until Ellen has to get involved and lock the thread for like 5 weeks and i can't have another snapchat from her (looking gorgeous!) and DMs from mods telling me to chill but that i'm right about her

not the 111 print... i'm a trailblazer

time... the ultimate truth teller

she is not some rando was fucking with yall

CLIMB UP THE H OF THE HOLLYWEED SIGN (YUH)

wtf is a arcadialovesong2018

it sounds like some random pc music song maybe HYD/QT, sounds like it could be her you could try asking in the comments who the artist is or maybe shazaming it

Ellie Goulding - Let It Die / 2022.10.19 / 5pm / 2:46

not fleshlight

her best song with EIE and descending

lana is sober and did/does AA and faith, god and all that stuff is embedded into the steps of AA

good morning

you know that baby

carly should worry about the quality of her songs being shite this era