DEMONDELREY

I know there are multiple International Conventions to consider, but there is no such thing as an international copyright. The Berne Convention tries to create harmony in terms of granted rights, but protection against unauthorised use does depend on National Law. Anyway, I agree! Law tends to be outdated and does not consider globalisation/new media.

Does anyone know which jurisdiction is applying to this case? I know it's a matter of Private International Law and choice but I was just wondering if anyone is aware. If we are looking at this from a UK perspective, Creep is absolutely eligible for protection. Work doesn't necessarily have to be "original" in the way that we understand it. The test established in both statutory and common law considers skill, labour and judgment. So, Radioqueef have a case. Now, within the UK jurisdiction, Courts tend to look at two aspects in order to determine if an infringement has occurred: similarities and how much is actually copied. 1) Looking at similarities is straightforward. If the similarities are significant enough to infer that copying has occurred, they will go onto the next step. Get Free does appear to have some similarities, we all acknowledge this to an extent. What most get confused about is the quantity question. 2) In terms of quantity, the Court will consider if copying has occurred in relation to a whole or substantial part of the original work. In regards to "substantial part"​, quantity isn't as important as quality (this can get confusing). Lana could copy as much as she wants as long as it is not an important part of the "original work". Important is determined by recognisability and etc (think of this as an iconic part of a song, like the riff from Black Sabbath's Iron Man). I do believe Radiosdjkfshdfk have a strong case. I'm just not sure about the remedy. It will be very difficult for Lana's team to prove Get Free was created independently. But anyway, once again, I have only studied Law from a UK and European perspective. So if anyone has studied Intellectual Property Law in the US feel free to add to this so we can compare tests - I think US Law will most likely apply here. Disclaimer: this is a juvenile description, if anyone wants more detail I can go into it but I prefer Human Rights Law so I kinda don't care much for Intellectual Property

"This is what you'll get when you mess with us" - Karma Police by Radiohead, they better start listening to their own tracks PSYCHIC LEGENDS

RADIOQUEEF FAIL AGAIN

“Radiorat are REACHING, your honour”

“COPYRIGHT IS AN ART, SO IS GET FREE”

I agree. I feel like she tries to avoid drama but I hope this is the year she starts standing up for herself instead of going under the radar and letting things slide

Radiohag just want coins, at least Miss Del Rey is donating to charity

CHARLIE IS THERE AWW

PRETTY WHEN YOU CRY??? ON THE FLOOR??? QUEEFING EVEN MY WIG IS BALD

IM GLAD SHE ISNT WEARING ADIDAS LEGGINGS I CAN GO TO SLEEP NOW

13 BITCHES

UMMM WHY ARE ALL THE LIVE STREAMERS SO UNRELIABLE LIKE YA WE GET IT ENJOY THE MOMENT AND ALL BUT THINK ABOUT THE CHILDREN ):

Wake me up if God starts playing Elvis

I hope Lana sings nothing tonight and just screams, Yoko Ono vibes

God Save Our Young Blood ft. Backup Del Rey

It’s up on Apple Music right now, idk how I feel about it yet

It sounded like an animated version her, thus I thought it was her? It’s not a difficult concept

HOW DID I MISS THIS WTF

DID YOU GUYS KNOW THAT THE OPENING OF 13 BEACHES IS A SAMPLE AND LANA ISN’T THE ONE TALKING (ALLEGEDLY)?? THIS IS NEWS TO ME??

Lana, sweaty, I need new music I’m already bored of lust for lipo :/

That sounds like a quest on Skyrim, gurl count me in

CATCH AND RELEASE, IT’S SO HAUNTING AND DELIRIOUS, ABSOLUTELY DIVINE

Cruel Sex World and Brooklyn Slutty Baby, aka BOPS

The Cherry video is about to get leaked on this exclusive site illustrated below, bookmark me