Jump to content

Sportscruiser

Members
  • Content Count

    1,497
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Sportscruiser

  1. She’s an headliner therefore she deserved to be with the rest of the headliners.
  2. Why couldn’t they release the album today? Her team has a whole decade of experience and they don’t seem to understand shit still.
  3. When American Bottom, DCooper, Stargirl Pinky and I do poppers tomorrow while Peppers is playing then what
  4. I was just reading your post mentioning Stargirl and DCooper and thinking “god, I wish that was me”. So adorable, thank you for thinking of me! Hell fucking yes ❤️
  5. It’s a charged lyric that will incite a conversation, why is this so troublesome? I don’t mind it all btw. What I do mind is the fact that you’re too hot and out of reach.
  6. It’s also note-worthy to remind (mostly myself) that this topic will most likely be present in the very album this pre release thread is dedicated to - if anything, look at the Grandfather lyric that sprouted the debate in the first place But when will she release the MV, that’s the question.
  7. I’ll shut up about this fascinating topic (which I’m sure would also be of Lana’s interest, judging by her lyricism and opinions made public) because it’s apparently irrelevant to some people when the discourse diverges from some variation of “Harry Nilsson has a song (…)”, “she’s so mother!” or vinyl color palettes. Anyways fuck Patty, her voice breaks at 2:05, Jimmy Jimmy cocoa puff, legend slay boots the house down or some shit like that. Carry on.
  8. Because we’ve been examining her previous “polemic” stances or lyrics and while most of us agree she has never deserved the hate and cancelation attempts that came her way, an user also said they advocate for absolute speech and I commented on that. But “Harry Nilsson has a song, his voice breaks at 3:05” I guess.
  9. Oh babe, you’re totally fine! I was actually referring to some things that Vertimus said that, while being surely well-intentioned, can be easily twisted into something more sinister. Asking for nuance doesn’t invalidate that are certain things (intolerance, prejudice, bigotry, etc) that require a more direct and objective moral stance. Not everything is black and white but not everything is grey either. This conversation is happening because of a certain lyric contained in a certain song from the upcoming album. It’s incredibly relevant, as ever.
  10. I was being polite and diplomatic. I agree with people having to see between the lines instead of jumping into modern-day lynches that serve no purpose other than incessant virtue signaling - however delving into the “everyone is entitled to feel, think and say whatever they want because who are we to police that?” rhetoric is dangerous because it’s exactly what the far right extremists use as ammo. There are ideals and values that should be reprimanded and questioned when they put the safety and the existence of large groups of people at risk. I will not not intervene if/when that happens.
×
×
  • Create New...