-
Content Count
6,264 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Everything posted by evalionisameme
-
Agreed-we went from synth pop/dark wave with hip hop influences to Pop Punk/Bubblegum pop to PC Music/Hyper pop for half of the last decade-it was time. N1A was an outlier in that it seemed to sum up her entire career up to that point
-
Well I’ve been on this section for many years and loved True Romance, Sucker, Vroom Vroom, the old mixtapes and Liked N1 Angel, a few songs off How I’m feeling now and Pop 2. Just really hated the Charli album.
-
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">feeding you something on Friday 13th… <br>pre save here.. <a href="https://t.co/PoMNOp90mC">https://t.co/PoMNOp90mC</a> <a href="https://t.co/pEE5NKAYxg">pic.twitter.com/pEE5NKAYxg</a></p>— Charli (@charli_xcx) <a href="https://twitter.com/charli_xcx/status/1424070684536303616?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">August 7, 2021</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script> Crap, why can’t I embed tweets here?
-
I hated charli, the era and the whole aesthetic was just very alien to me as a charli fan and I couldn’t get into it, the looks she’s serving give me what she excels at-sex appeal and darkness.
-
There was an old tweet about her being stupid for getting back with him.
-
https://www.azquotes.com/quote/1599217 Anyone remember messy charli? This and her Chris Brown/Rihanna tweet always send me
-
This 80s meets 60s vibe is very interesting
-
Probably doing some radio frequency-her bodies lit though but hey if she wants it, she can.
-
This + Then we kiss, Outta this world, Outrageous, Gimme more,Don’t let me and when your eyes say it- for me.
-
Y’all watch one YouTube video on the domestication of women and patriarchy and apply it to every opinion someone has , all whilst referencing 2007 as a breakdown which she arguably seemed happier aswell as more in control then she is now(talk about misogyny). Shaving your head does not incur a breakdown nor does partying and your “woke” analysis should be able to determine that. At most she had Episodes of directed anger and sadness which was justified with the media coverage. Social media whether you all like or not is a prominent tool in society and can get you rejected from jobs etc does Hold up in a point of court as evidence to someone’s behaviour. Britney cannot even drive unless otherwise monitored or use her card-you think she’s posting on social media unfiltered? Lmao.
-
You are all taking this completely out of context..I’m not blinded by stan goggles and I obviously do not think the conservatorship is good evidenced by all past comments but yes it doesn’t appear well-just look at any FB comment. it’s interesting that her posts have always been rational and made perfect sense up until her conflict with the conservatorship-if you look at any post from 2016 they are goofy but a normal moms Instagram. videos of people staring at the camera, walking off and staring again will obviously be interpreted in one way or another. But if you want to believe the Instagram is hers despite court evidence suggesting the contrary that’s up to you.
-
The posts aren’t doing her any good, if it is controlled by her-which I find relatively unlikely, her solicitor should be advising her on her public perception and the writing/dancing looks like episodes of mania. Any of this can be used against her in court proceedings. You can call it misogyny but regardless of this being a man or a woman, people have eyes and will have underlying thoughts.
-
Sam has liked previous posts which have been speculated to be run by Cassies management comp.We don’t know the entirety of her social media arrangement but the posting style is exactly the same and has not changed, so it’s highly unlikely that the person behind them is different. As for the posts, they don’t portray her in the best light with the editing and permasunburn filter and it’s consistency with belittling the very doc that helped spotlight #freebritney is interesting. I can very much see how the posts can be interpreted as “unhinged” to suit teams narrative.
-
the Americans really said Copy+ Paste
-
I always thought Britneys BOMT was weirdly over impacted considering Her sound was taken by her producers from Robyn and more likely Billie Piper who had massive success in the UK+ Australia. you can hear where max got baby from below: You can even hear the baby voice
-
I’m not saying this to portray charli as vacuous either but an artists input and creativity in their songs usually yields their best output even with people who typically don’t like Britney.
-
She did not sing a single writers demo during sucker and stated in interviews she was adamantly against this because she is a writer foremost and would be nothing without her written songs, she can sing others written songs if she wants I just hope it’s for significant purpose because her songwriting skill hasn’t been amazing for awhile anyhow. But it will be odd as Charli has marketed herself over the years as a songwriter not a “singer” or a entertainer/dancer-she doesn’t produce or bother with production input so her only stance on being an artist comes from her songwriting.
-
Is anyone else disappointed by Charlis comments regarding artistry and songwriting? I mean charles I get you can cut songs if you like them but an artist should be involved with their work in some form-whether that’s production or songwriting. I also get the sucker era was a long time ago but she stated she values her songwriting as her primary form of creativity and that she didn’t want to accept badly written songs nor be a voice piece. Honestly if this era does bad I see this all blowing up In her face and saying the label pushed it. She already gives no care about her voice, can we have something?
-
I hated the tropical pop era, it gave us shape of you, work, sorry and many more abominations
-
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.newyorker.com/news/american-chronicles/britney-spears-conservatorship-nightmare/amp The gaslighting from team con trying convince us she owns her social media account but isn’t allowed a phone? also her father calling her a bad mother, a whore and getting her a trainer for her comeback because she’s “fat” ?. im 100 % convinced her comestic surgery was forced on her by him to look perfect, the sicko.
-
an NDA doesn’t work like some of you guys think, she can share a post on her stories- I can see why people are disappointed, it’s weird that she mentions her in nearly every interview yet has stayed silent. she doesn’t have to of course but because you’ve mentioned her so much people will assume you’re in support of the conservatorship. She’s also very active on social media so it’s not like she doesn’t know or hasn’t for months. again nobody should send hate but it is odd.
-
A lot of people have assumed this since the domination era at least-and I’m sure she had very limited or non existent social media control before that. anyway it’s not a theory it’s a fact, people caught an upload of Avril Lavigne on her profile who coincidentally has the same social media manager.
-
I mean people do have personal lives too, but I understand what you mean-there are some celebrities that are very particularly engaged on social media like charli that have never spoken about it despite obsessing over her in interviews. But I’d rather them reach out in private tbh than publicly say stuff for media and fan attention
-
Ingham isn’t going to file for the petition to end unless he can make money out of it. truly disturbing
-
It’s interesting that she mentioned Miley who is mentioned a bit on her account aswell.