Jump to content

Charlottexseax

Members
  • Content Count

    3,116
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Charlottexseax

  1. omfg yes i need my problematic gay icons to collab
  2. but she invented it herself,,,,,,, like it's not like britney spears, who was fabricated by her label and given a completely new persona and singing style to make sales, "marina and the diamonds" was marina lambrini diamandis. also she deadass went from doing piano pop to borderline edm to dream pop so saying "i dont wanna feel confined by my name" is not an excuse as clearly nobody was also like if you follow her reasoning she changed her name to be "herself" and then started to make basic pop songs? like if this is herself does this mean all her previous records are fake? does this mean TFJ was fake? does this mean nothing happened the day she turned seventeen? does this mean she doesn't always feel the worst and she doesn't act like she's the best? does this mean she didn't find what she was looking for in herself? does this mean her branches aren't heavy? yall trust way too much marina's word when we know half of the things she says aren't real. heartcore? froot repackage? dr luke? boring pop stars? she changes her mind twice a day
  3. You think that’s not enough?? It’s a fourth of the album... + the fact that these are the singles she chose to present the album Like this is enough. Either the album is v consistent within itself and it’s all bad or it’s very inconsistent and it also has some good ass songs. Which is not a v good possibility either
  4. Charlottexseax

    Charli XCX

    Who would ever release a cover amidst a period of no releases? Like it would’ve made sense for her to release it during N1A/Pop 2 era bc we had so much original material, now that everybody’s waiting for her to say something about her new album she comes out with a cover like what?? Is?? The??? Reasoning?? Behind??? Couldn’t she drop it after her first single/as a b side to ride on the hype? Now it’s been 6 months since 1999 and all the hype has died. It would’ve been such a good move to release it alongside 1999
  5. Charlottexseax

    Charli XCX

    1999 was lowkey a flop so theres no nostalgia wave. like unless shes riding her own nostalgia which doesnt make that much sense
  6. That’s literally the same thing we thought for INHA but then it turned out it was the bridge
  7. The singles slapped af but the rest is kinda meh,,,,, also I’m kinda over her breathy voice, she can sing but she needs to vary a bit Omg they deadass wrote where you can download the album in the other page
  8. Charlottexseax

    Charli XCX

    Charli is not releasing a cover of a boring pop song when she has 30 new songs ready to be released
  9. Omg I feel so hyped that she said Verona + that song sounds GOOD!! I know I said the same for oOoOoOoOrange but now i have a feeling it’s gonna be good
  10. Charlottexseax

    Charli XCX

    Tea BIOYL is like not getting released on the 5th of April alongside a mv
  11. Charlottexseax

    Charli XCX

    I mean it’s ok if she likes boring 90s pop but since we are gays and we hold the supreme taste we want Pop 2 typa stuff k Charles? Go releases XCX3 or something
  12. Charlottexseax

    Charli XCX

    I don’t see them anywhere tbh Or in the sense that it will kill her career Although to have your career killed you need to have one in the first place and Charli been not had one since 2015
  13. This is so funny but I can’t understand why
  14. Charlottexseax

    Charli XCX

    i literally dont need a cover from her. she should scrap it and have it leaked like marina did with true colours
  15. hes the same guy who was teasing superstar lyrics 2 days before the release thinking he was cool lets ignore him
  16. i cackled dfjdfljskfjlòlkjlfsdfkò anyway if yall dont know who globelamp is yall are gay anyway to stay on topic banned for being a felonie stan
  17. banned for saying EH is basic
  18. There are much more interesting things to take into account than covers, e.g. melodies... after all covers and mvs fall into the same category of visuals. But anyway a 7/10 for OT?? When you give a mark you should establish an example with 10/10 characteristics and one with 0/10. These hold no water For example, 10/10 might be Froot, and compared to that none of them reach Froot’s level. A 10/10 production might be Primadonna or Lies, and they are nowhere near as carefully crafted as that These marks should not exist in a vacuum but should have some sort of comparability (is that even a word) to the rest of her discography
  19. its a good song but all the spam is so unnecessary. cute vibes tho
  20. U lowkey served some hot tea, the melody is so dried... like there is no build up and there is no release, which not every song has to have but it’s defo the easier the way to make a pop song that bops (example: Chandelier, Someone Like You, Starring Role). On top of that the melody itself is not that creative. I highly doubt people are going to go back on these songs, there’s just no interestin factor besides the initial hype.
  21. Charlottexseax

    Charli XCX

    Waterfall is definitely one of the best tracks on XCXWORLD but I can kinda see how y’all don’t think it fitted Tbh it always gives me a very 2000s sound. I can’t exactly tell what it is but there’s something that’s very 00 in it
  22. SS, HH and OT seem so uninspired to me tbh... You can defo see that they put a great deal of work on Baby, even though I don’t like it and I think it’s a stupid ass title. The melody was cute, the arrangement was cute, the lyrics kinda make sense... like it’s not a song for the generations to come to remember but it’s cute. The rest tho... like she deadass put more work in her GarageBand demos. They are so boring. The melodies are all over the place. And like I know a lot of people don’t give a fuck about the musical aspect but her early demos were SO much better than this. Like in songs like Starlight, Supermodel’s Legs, Pancake Karma etc... the music she played was much more interesting. Like even as far as chords are concerned they were much more diverse and interesting. And the lyrics... Like it’s easy to brush off any kind of criticism as just people not adjusting to her new sound but it’s not just like that. She used to be much more interesting. From every point of view. I know y’all are happy she’s back and I’m too, but I don’t want a dummy that fails to imitate the Marina I used to love. I want Marina. And this is a watered down version of her
  23. Charlottexseax

    Charli XCX

    Not when Queen Lizzy has already been crowned worst song of XCXWORLD
  24. the video is stunning and she looks incredible but it sounds so bad
×
×
  • Create New...