Lust for Life Reviews/Metacritic Thread

[SuperMegaStan 9,699]

67 from CoS 

https://consequenceofsound.net/2017/07/album-review-lana-del-rey-lust-for-life/ 

 

we definitely need more >80s to come through....

 

 

 

and i found many critics lol-ing at her meta-reference in TNC and praising Coachella

[longtimeman 8,291]

67 from CoS 

https://consequenceofsound.net/2017/07/album-review-lana-del-rey-lust-for-life/ 

 

we definitely need more >80s to come through....

Opinions aside, this guy is a terrible writer. The review reads like it was Google translated from English to Chinese and back again 

sample quote:

 

If cooking music isn’t your primary impetus to put on a Lana record, you’re doing it wrong.

To paraphrase the old Jewish joke, "for this, he makes a living?!"

[Coney Island King 25,358]

67 from CoS

https://consequenceofsound.net/2017/07/album-review-lana-del-rey-lust-for-life/

 

we definitely need more >80s to come through....

 

 

 

and i found many critics lol-ing at her meta-reference in TNC and praising Coachella

One review said the worst song on the album was Tomorrow Never Came. I stopped reading there.

[latothemoon 11,828]

7.7 from Pitchfork, her highest score from them yet. Hoping for a good one from Rolling Stone

[longtimeman 8,291]

I'm sure it's purely a coincidence but most of the 0's seem to be coming from people who either only have one review, or have only reviewed this album and given 10s to Lorde   [or Gaga or Katy Perry]

[Coney Island King 25,358]

I'm sure it's purely a coincidence but most of the 0's seem to be coming from people who either only have one review, or have only reviewed this album and given 10s to Lorde [or Gaga or Katy Perry]

Its just angry twink bottoms.

[SuperMegaStan 9,699]

another 70 from rimming stone

http://www.rollingstone.com/music/albumreviews/review-lana-del-reys-lust-for-life-w493824

[ilovetati 15,295]

Also 70 from AllMusic and 80 from Prefix

[GodBlessMe 2,141]

'Critical acclaim' on Metacritic sadly doesn't seem that realistic anymore

[ilovetati 15,295]

Missing:

 

80 - Prefix

75 - AV

70 - AllMusic

70- Rolling Stone

67 - Consequence of Sound

'Critical Acclaim' on Metacritic sadly doesn't seem that realistic anymore

Yeah, it's going to fall quite a bit

[daytonadeath 3,596]

http://pitchfork.com/reviews/albums/lana-del-rey-lust-for-life/?mbid=social_facebook pitchfork gave her 77

[ilovetati 15,295]

80 from NME

[Coney Island King 25,358]

it will settle at a 79-82 range when its all said and done. still a very good score.

[SuperMegaStan 9,699]

NME should have come thru with a 90 but whatever.... 

 

please stay 80+ 

[surfnoirswing 2,483]

Rolling Stone had the audacity to give HM 4 stars and 3.5 to LFL

[daytonadeath 3,596]

Rolling Stone had the audacity to give HM 4 stars and 3.5 to LFL

well...Honeymoon should get 4.5 and LFL 4

[Cherry on Top 395]

There is no comparison. "Honeymoon" is pure class. "Lust for Life"... well, a total mess.

[ilovetati 15,295]

There is no comparison. "Honeymoon" is pure class. "Lust for Life"... well, a total mess.

Cool opinion that isn't a fact

[white gold 4,242]

Pitchfork talked about her lyrics for almost the entire review, but completely neglected the lyrical masterpiece that is Heroin...

[ilovetati 15,295]

Down to 79 after everything but AV Club added.

 

She seriously needs raves from EW, LA Times,Q Magazine, and Boston or no way she's going back to 81+