ultrabanisters

have BoZo or eclitz said anything bc otherwise i’m not believing any 'insider' #learnfromthepast

if it was a womans leaks she wouldnt post anything like that... really weird behaviour from her honestly

keep it in that case

a woman who thinks. an intellectual

now WHAT am i supposed to analyse here be so ffr charlise

honestly she has some scary stalkers so i prefer that she does have one/expected her to have one but her posting that is so funny she stays strapped tf uppp maybe thats what was in her little bag at the grammys

maybe she said 'guntry' album not 'country' album

i recall lana saying "thinks are about to get crazy, for a long time"

ERMMMM????

help

lana acknowledging it help

idk i might provide a stream

back to this been listening to prettiest girl in country music alot lately i’m excited!!

anyways i’m gonna lock this thread because yikes go back to the TS thread and talk about whatever album shes rerecording next idk edit: unlocking now incase you still wanna talk about this (respectfully)

'climate terrorist' is a commonly used colloquial term for those who lack environmental compassion and/or care for emissions they are not actively calling taylor swift an fbi watch list level terrorist

excuse me

this thread has me giggling a lil actually you do not need to defend a billionaire climate disaster polluter just because she is your fav. you can love her but also question and critique her evidently abhorrent practices, including attempting to sue people spreading publicly available info as someone said, barbara streissand effect in full swing p.p.s: crying blackmail over an obvious half joke is so unserious can we please critically think

it’s more the short unnecessary flights that could've easily been done by other means like a car

he couldve asked for a gas-guzzling co2 emitting vehicle and instead opted for a environmentally friendly tree hugging vehicle how considerate of him!!!!

awarding him an honourary lipster award for his service to the public

this is what pisses me off most about her and other billionaires private jet usage. corporations pander to us and moan at us to recycle and use sustainable practices when in reality it is a drop in the ocean compared to the shit these celebrities get up to in the name of convenience FOR THEM taylor doesnt care for anyone but herself, and this lawsuit evidences that perfectly. the nerve to try and sue someone for publicising publicly available knowledge just because it inconveniences you is abhorrent quite honestly

the thing is with (lets use kim as an example) skims or kkw beauty/rem/etc is that it is providing a commodity to people, so the horrendous carbon impact is slightly offset by providing a service. taylor swift is providing absolutely no service to anyone but herself by parading around the country in a private jet. it is just a straight up lie that it is causing 'emotional distress' and it is purely a game of her trying to intimidate and use the legal system to put people less fortunate than her down.

yeah no i disagree with the privacy sentiment, she has a strong security presence and can certainly afford more. it is publicly available data and it just screams that she is trying to stop the private jet discourse by threatening and being litigious to people she knows cant afford top calibre lawyers. keep tracking i say

youuuoouuoouuuoouu know what i want one of my favourite unreleased songs i would love for it to have it’s place on an album

on our way would work really well in a country rework just saying