Jump to content
ilovetati

NFR Metacritic/Review Thread

Recommended Posts

lol just ignore them, it doesn't matter. just don't do the same thing to taylor swift, it's not her fault

 

or i'll go ክፉ ቃል የሚናገሩ እጅግ ይሰቃያሉ ፡፡  በቅርቡ ይጠፋሉ የሚለውን እውነታ መቀበል ብልህነት ነው ፡፡  በፍርድ ላይ ዐረፍተ ነገር አፍርተሃል ፡፡  ንስሐ መግባት ይፈልጋሉ ግን በጣም ዘግይቷል። 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Some of these critics deserve to be put down wtf. I haaate reviewers and articles that cannot let go of the 2011 ideas about her. Time's moved on old men.

exactly. as a critic it's their job to be unbiased and focus on the music. 


I never meant to be bad or unwell I was just living on the edge right between heaven and hell & I'm tired of it 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

People should really email Metacritic about the Telegraph review...they've taken off misogynist reviews before.

 

The real bias is the Alexis Guardian review, though. If someone sent the screen shots of Lana mentioning him and the infamous 2014 interview, they would take it off for bias. 

 

They removed LFL's highest score for "bias" but never explained why.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Stupid question: someone said in this topic that Meaghan Garvey will review the album for Pitchfork. Are there some proofs? Or just your speculations?

 

I asked her about NFR review and she responded „You know I got you”.


giphy.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah, but she already wrote this (great) piece for Billboard: https://www.billboard.com/articles/columns/pop/8527901/lana-del-rey-billboard-cover-story-2019

 

Hope you're right, 'cause if it's her the score will be very high this time.

 

 

The score is decided by the editorial team as a whole, so it's still up in the air a bit! Sometimes they publish reviews where the writing and the score barely match  :deadbanana:


fullsizeoutput-3494.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The score is decided by the editorial team as a whole, so it's still up in the air a bit! Sometimes they publish reviews where the writing and the score barely match  :deadbanana:

I know that, but i've read many enthusiastic opinions by p4k's team on Twitter. Hope still a dangerous thing, btw.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

About the Guardian review: I'm sending an e-mail claiming the review was highly mysoginist and the guy's judgment was clouded by his own bias regarding Lana's history with the publication, and I encourage y'all to do the same. The email is editorial@metacritic.com


into your eyes tumblr_olomd1pIFG1u8tvjvo2_500.gif my face remains

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

About the Guardian review: I'm sending an e-mail claiming the review was highly mysoginist and the guy's judgment was clouded by his own bias regarding Lana's history with the publication, and I encourage y'all to do the same. The email is editorial@metacritic.com

 

Don't forget to send the screenshot. 

 

lana.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

About the Guardian review: I'm sending an e-mail claiming the review was highly mysoginist and the guy's judgment was clouded by his own bias regarding Lana's history with the publication, and I encourage y'all to do the same. The email is editorial@metacritic.com

paste it so i could send it


                                                 tumblr_n5fth3ig6s1rpppaho1_500.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Don’t copy and paste the same message - they’ll ignore it

 

Yes, they will see it as spam. But essentially I wrote that his review was clouded by his own bias regarding Lana because of that interview and that his views about women in general tend to be very mysoginistic and usually his reviews carry a mysoginistic tone (even cited Taylor, Lizzo and Bey as examples).


into your eyes tumblr_olomd1pIFG1u8tvjvo2_500.gif my face remains

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

def no c&p, if anything it will help our case if we just send a few sentences where we look like normal vaguely offended people and not stans who've dissected and critiqued every line :judgingu3:

 

don't use your stan email address + make sure your real one can't be linked back to twitter, instagram, facebook, or lanaboards :judgingu3: if they see one mention of cinnamon girl…... the whole operation is foiled

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

send a few sentences where we look like normal vaguely offended people and not stans who've dissected and critiqued every line :judgingu3:

 

The problem is: english it's not my first language + i have adhd so I always have the need to make myself come across as clear as I can, which resulted in a three paragraphs e-mail about how mysoginist and disrespectful the guy was   :judgingu3:


into your eyes tumblr_olomd1pIFG1u8tvjvo2_500.gif my face remains

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

this alexis guy is a fucking asshole though. he tends to score garbage male singers higher than any woman AND he gave high as hope a 3/5! the AUDACITY

 

He and his fragile male ego must have felt threatened listening to NFR (song).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...