Valerie

Imagine having that mindset...yikes

Maybe the way that I'm living
Is killing the environment
 

Lana acting concerned about the environment despite her personal carbon footprint being massive through use of yachts and private jets alone is laughable
 
The use of private jets is hardly ever necessary outside of medical emergencies and, on a more controversial level, heads of state
 
By using them u are producing 10 times the amount of carbon per passenger
 
A 2 hour flight on her private jet will amount to approx 5.2 tonnes of CO2, so 10.4 tonnes for the return flight, we are recommended to multiply that initial figure by 1.9, which makes the total sum even higher, meaning from just one return private flight, Lana is already using up three times more tonnes than the average citizens yearly emissions
 
Therefore Lana's personal carbon footprint is much higher in comparison, which is not even a question, especially considering she has far less people aboard in comparison to a commercial jet. The idea is that Lana is so privileged she can z00m0z00m her private jet around while paying for offset (which is the equivalent of abusing a woman but then donating to women's shelters to rectify it) but the thing is, average people cannot do that and would instead need to decrease consumption meaning they will have issues with higher prices. So, Lana is out of touch because she will not have to tackle the consequences of her forthcoming policies the same way a normal person would

This has become one of my biggest issues with Lana. Finally deciding to care after years of scoffing at this stuff, dismissing feminism, etc, is not enough. And her young white fans be calling her "woke queen" when she still really knows nothing and is doing nothing except hoping her words will turn to birds and birds will send her thoughts our way 

The threat of climate change as she flies around in a private jet

One person can influence others to make changes, which was the point in mentioning Greta Thunberg who has garnered up to 7 million protesters ww
 
Defending someone who uses private jets regularly (while they complain about climate change in interviews, no less) because "one person won't make a difference!1!1" is the logical fallacy here
 
Evidently when speaking of global greenhouse gas emissions the AVERAGE single person's contribution would be minuscule
 
However
 
The privileged population are proven to be responsible for 50% of emissions and a lot of that is due to their flying methods
 
Lana is a part of that
 
Therefore, if she wants actual changes to start happening, why doesn't she start by applying them to her personal life, while also actually saying something of substance rather than "people who are pro-environment have lovely voices" as this interview suggests?
 
Lana enjoys dipping her toes in, but so rarely follows through with said beliefs. One could take ur argument and actually flip it: since u consider one person's actions so irrelevant, whether it is climate change or veganism, what's the point in Lana's "lovely voices" words? It amounts to nothing, far more so than a single person's actions would. And, if she feels so strongly about it, why does she fly in private jets routinely? 

The difference 1 person can make is actually astounding if u consider Greta Thunberg but OK, Lana flying around in her unnecessary private jet while whining about climate change in interviews isn't hypocritical at all lmao
 
Lana has absolutely no reason to fly around in a private jet, period
 
Isn't ur friend Elle a vegan? Are u going to tell her to stop being a vegan because 1 person doesn't make a difference?

The fact that u equate private jet usage to any of these things when it is proven that the rich are responsible for 50% of emissions, namely due to their flying choices (PRIVATE JETS)
 
The fact that u think it is so out of the question that Lana could make a difference over her "lovely voices" garbage, when u know damn well her fans are highly influenced by her 
 
Or even just, you know, Lana refraining from using private jets because it's completely pointless to do so. Why does she feel so strongly about climate change, but then fly private jets routinely? Why?
 
That can't be answered, because u know it's hypocritical of her.
 
Celebrities who bat their eyes during their green thumb speeches don't have the balls to call out private jet usage because they all know they do it, and how terrible it truly is for the environment
 
U said one famous person's actions is pointless so why does Lana bother saying (and not even applying what she says to her life) anything at all then?

@ Melissa
 
 
The clothing on my back is not responsible for even one tenth of what Lana's and every other rich person's private jets are capable of. The private jets are one of the real culprits here that u keep trying to dodge.
 
So wearing clothes is your defense to Lana flying around in a private jet routinely, while she preaches the opposite in her interviews?
 
Isn't what u say to me, also applying to her?
 
You're calling me a hypocrite for wearing clothes but having an issue with rich people & their senseless use of private jets, but defending Lana for flying private jets everywhere despite her preaching in interviews about the environment?
 
She shouldn't be preaching while she contributes to one of the worst acts for the environment, right?
 
Because that's what you're advising me against right now, simply for wearing clothes though, not flying around a private jet everywhere when there are more viable options.
 
And yet u defend her.
 
What even is your argument anymore, LMAO
 
Equating clothing to private jet flights
 
Btw, that same website u provided also stated what I already have in ANOTHER article: https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2015/dec/02/worlds-richest-10-produce-half-of-global-carbon-emissions-says-oxfam
 
Also, do u think corps aren't included in the rich category I mentioned? Hollywood celebrities aren't the only rich people in the world. U just supported my point with ur link...
 
The way u make a mockery out of this is gross lmao. Someone can't point out how unnecessary it is for rich people to fly private jets around without another taking an issue with it, no wonder our environment continues to have a STENCH

The fact that u equate private jet usage to any of these things when it is proven that the rich are responsible for 50% of emissions, namely due to their flying choices (PRIVATE JETS)
 
The fact that u think it is so out of the question that Lana could make a difference over her "lovely voices" garbage, when u know damn well her fans are highly influenced by her 
 
Or even just, you know, Lana refraining from using private jets because it's completely pointless to do so. Why does she feel so strongly about climate change, but then fly private jets routinely? Why?
 
That can't be answered, because u know it's hypocritical of her.
 
Celebrities who bat their eyes during their green thumb speeches don't have the balls to call out private jet usage because they all know they do it, and how terrible it truly is for the environment
 
U said one famous person's actions is pointless so why does Lana bother saying (and not even applying what she says to her life) anything at all then?

Maybe the way that I'm living
Is killing the environment
 

Maybe the way that I'm living
Is killing the environment
 

One person can influence others to make changes, which was the point in mentioning Greta Thunberg who has garnered up to 7 million protesters ww
 
Defending someone who uses private jets regularly (while they complain about climate change in interviews, no less) because "one person won't make a difference!1!1" is the logical fallacy here
 
Evidently when speaking of global greenhouse gas emissions the AVERAGE single person's contribution would be minuscule
 
However
 
The privileged population are proven to be responsible for 50% of emissions and a lot of that is due to their flying methods
 
Lana is a part of that
 
Therefore, if she wants actual changes to start happening, why doesn't she start by applying them to her personal life, while also actually saying something of substance rather than "people who are pro-environment have lovely voices" as this interview suggests?
 
Lana enjoys dipping her toes in, but so rarely follows through with said beliefs. One could take ur argument and actually flip it: since u consider one person's actions so irrelevant, whether it is climate change or veganism, what's the point in Lana's "lovely voices" words? It amounts to nothing, far more so than a single person's actions would. And, if she feels so strongly about it, why does she fly in private jets routinely? 

Lana acting concerned about the environment despite her personal carbon footprint being massive through use of yachts and private jets alone is laughable
 
The use of private jets is hardly ever necessary outside of medical emergencies and, on a more controversial level, heads of state
 
By using them u are producing 10 times the amount of carbon per passenger
 
A 2 hour flight on her private jet will amount to approx 5.2 tonnes of CO2, so 10.4 tonnes for the return flight, we are recommended to multiply that initial figure by 1.9, which makes the total sum even higher, meaning from just one return private flight, Lana is already using up three times more tonnes than the average citizens yearly emissions
 
Therefore Lana's personal carbon footprint is much higher in comparison, which is not even a question, especially considering she has far less people aboard in comparison to a commercial jet. The idea is that Lana is so privileged she can z00m0z00m her private jet around while paying for offset (which is the equivalent of abusing a woman but then donating to women's shelters to rectify it) but the thing is, average people cannot do that and would instead need to decrease consumption meaning they will have issues with higher prices. So, Lana is out of touch because she will not have to tackle the consequences of her forthcoming policies the same way a normal person would

The threat of climate change as she flies around in a private jet

One person can influence others to make changes, which was the point in mentioning Greta Thunberg who has garnered up to 7 million protesters ww
 
Defending someone who uses private jets regularly (while they complain about climate change in interviews, no less) because "one person won't make a difference!1!1" is the logical fallacy here
 
Evidently when speaking of global greenhouse gas emissions the AVERAGE single person's contribution would be minuscule
 
However
 
The privileged population are proven to be responsible for 50% of emissions and a lot of that is due to their flying methods
 
Lana is a part of that
 
Therefore, if she wants actual changes to start happening, why doesn't she start by applying them to her personal life, while also actually saying something of substance rather than "people who are pro-environment have lovely voices" as this interview suggests?
 
Lana enjoys dipping her toes in, but so rarely follows through with said beliefs. One could take ur argument and actually flip it: since u consider one person's actions so irrelevant, whether it is climate change or veganism, what's the point in Lana's "lovely voices" words? It amounts to nothing, far more so than a single person's actions would. And, if she feels so strongly about it, why does she fly in private jets routinely? 

Lana acting concerned about the environment despite her personal carbon footprint being massive through use of yachts and private jets alone is laughable
 
The use of private jets is hardly ever necessary outside of medical emergencies and, on a more controversial level, heads of state
 
By using them u are producing 10 times the amount of carbon per passenger
 
A 2 hour flight on her private jet will amount to approx 5.2 tonnes of CO2, so 10.4 tonnes for the return flight, we are recommended to multiply that initial figure by 1.9, which makes the total sum even higher, meaning from just one return private flight, Lana is already using up three times more tonnes than the average citizens yearly emissions
 
Therefore Lana's personal carbon footprint is much higher in comparison, which is not even a question, especially considering she has far less people aboard in comparison to a commercial jet. The idea is that Lana is so privileged she can z00m0z00m her private jet around while paying for offset (which is the equivalent of abusing a woman but then donating to women's shelters to rectify it) but the thing is, average people cannot do that and would instead need to decrease consumption meaning they will have issues with higher prices. So, Lana is out of touch because she will not have to tackle the consequences of her forthcoming policies the same way a normal person would

Imagine having that mindset...yikes

The difference 1 person can make is actually astounding if u consider Greta Thunberg but OK, Lana flying around in her unnecessary private jet while whining about climate change in interviews isn't hypocritical at all lmao
 
Lana has absolutely no reason to fly around in a private jet, period
 
Isn't ur friend Elle a vegan? Are u going to tell her to stop being a vegan because 1 person doesn't make a difference?

The threat of climate change as she flies around in a private jet

The threat of climate change as she flies around in a private jet

The threat of climate change as she flies around in a private jet

The threat of climate change as she flies around in a private jet

The threat of climate change as she flies around in a private jet

The threat of climate change as she flies around in a private jet