How would you feel if LDR used AI for future music releases?

[Eugene 26,669]

[Make me your Dream Life 87,782]

Only for remixes

[Mer 61,735]

This is an incredibly silly “Lana Thought”. She wouldn’t even consider it. Why are we getting ourselves worked up over a literal non-issue. 

[Make me your Dream Life 87,782]

She could make an ai portion screen in a computer screen and cameo that in an actual music video

[ivory almond 15,604]

i would definitely become a hater but this will never happen

[Brooklyn Fetus 3,524]

3 minutes ago, ivory almond said:

i would definitely become a hater but this will never happen

LMAOO THE SCREAMING BITCH FROM AHS ON UR PFP AS LANA

[ivory almond 15,604]

4 minutes ago, Brooklyn Fetus said:

SCREAMING BITCH FROM AHS

SAY HER NAME!!!

THAT IS SARAH PAULSON

[Brooklyn Fetus 3,524]

Just now, ivory almond said:

SAY HER NAME!!!

THAT IS SARAH PAULSON

MY QUEEN

[star Iux 5,983]

Never in her music but MAYBE for visuals, I love what Elita did for She bangs like a fairy on acid’s mv, but we don’t need another grimes

[ChaoticLipster 24,618]

1 hour ago, Strangelove said:

She uses computer generated instruments and auto tune in many of her songs.

 

She can keep it as a separate project to play around with. For example, we could get her Lizzy Grant vocals on a modern track.

We are talking about AI making the entire song, lyrics and vocals even. Artists have been using digital based instrumentation for decades that isn’t quite the same as AI, as the producer and artist still have control over the sound and artistic vision.  She has used autotune but as an aesthetic to match the song.

[Strangelove 1,842]

30 minutes ago, ChaoticLipster said:

We are talking about AI making the entire song, lyrics and vocals even. Artists have been using digital based instrumentation for decades that isn’t quite the same as AI, as the producer and artist still have control over the sound and artistic vision.  She has used autotune but as an aesthetic to match the song.

I made the post. Who is we? 
 

You’ll need to read in between the lines of my post and identify I was noting her music has had an element of being inauthentic for a while.

[Eugene 26,669]

close this thread 

[Tana Mongeau 4,989]

3 hours ago, Strangelove said:

Personally, I am very open to it. 

Just no.

It would be an insult to herself as an artist, other artists and also her fan. It would be inauthentic. AI is just an imitation of whatever you’re asking it to replicate. 
also lyricism would be shite, computer generated vocals?

yeah I’ll pass queen 😭

[ultrabanisters 45,001]

the 'blue banisters was lazy' crowd would have aneurysms 

[Strangelove 1,842]

2 hours ago, Mer said:

This is an incredibly silly “Lana Thought”. She wouldn’t even consider it. Why are we getting ourselves worked up over a literal non-issue. 

The crowd is so riled up; they should see all of my unapproved posts!

[TrashMagiq 58,573]

AI could come up with more thought-provoking lyrics than those of Violets for Roses and Beautiful but that’s not really saying much 

[bluechemtrails 26,724]

Creating AI-generated music is nothing special, almost anyone can do it these days.

 

The special thing is to be original, to create something that nobody else can do, not even an AI.

[dietpussycola 871]

Keeping Lana’s sound throughout the years in mind, I don’t see Lana using or having a reason to use AI anytime soon. However, Lana also strikes me as the type that wouldn’t completely shut herself off from the option. I don’t remember exactly where I’ve seen them, but I distinctly remember a few conversations where Lana is speaking positively about tech. Plus, she has connections with people like Elon Musk and Grimes, two people who are very open to that whole world of tech, so I’m sure she has her own reservations on the matter but has yet to share. All this is just to say to never say never with Lana. As we know by now, she is quite multifaceted. 

 

Personally, I would not be opposed to it. BUT ONLY if the music is able maintain that human touch. I think it could open a whole world of possibilities for Lana’s music sonically. I don’t want 100% AI. Anything less than 20 or 25% AI usage is fine with me. I think if it was any more than that, it becomes difficult to call that song hers.

 

It’s also a matter of which parts are being made with AI. As someone who enjoys Lana’s lyricism and melodies.. if she ever used AI for writing, I would find it hard to keep my respect. I’m less critical about using AI for the instrumentation. However, as I said before, I don’t see Lana needing a reason for using AI unless she gets into an electro-pop mood one day (Go Go Dancer Era 2.0, anyone? ). Lool

[vicdelrey 404]

There's a girl on YouTube who make her own songs, and she put Lana voice on it. The channel is @/ lassoroundmyneck, it's actually really good to the point that I downloaded them to have them in my local files  so I wouldn't like Lana to use AI for her own project but im not gonna lie it can create some bop

[ivory almond 15,604]

27 minutes ago, TrashMagiq said:

AI could come up with more thought-provoking lyrics than those of Violets for Roses

ntm on violets for roses aka top 3 song on bb...