Charli XCX

[BLURRYFACE 1,713]

https://twitter.com/Beats1/status/939943089359216643

Unlock It (f/Kim Petras & Jay Park) premiering tomorrow     

Kim Petras & Jay Park OMG 

 

YES 

[fkacowboy 326]

this confirms she did unlock it literally less than 3 months ago.. I'm smelling rushed mixtape

 

 

her lyrics include "i wanna get fucked up" and "wanna make yo bottle pop"

so idk what makes y'all think it takes her so long to make these songs. the

production is what takes time, and since SOPHIE and her make magic together

quite easily, it makes sense that it doesn't take that long for her to put out songs.

she makes simple bops that are fun and catchy. they're not big concepts that

reflect her inner demons or something lmao. it's not rushed imo is all i'm sayin

[wraith 7,277]

ok this photo slays https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DQuEwPlXkAADR3S.jpg

[lonely lonely night 4,968]

y'all i hate to say it but the more i think about the title "pop 2" the cringier it gets

[Party Party 3,532]

y'all i hate to say it but the more i think about the title "pop 2" the cringier it gets

I agree....why "Pop 2"? what does it even mean???

[lonely lonely night 4,968]

I agree....why "Pop 2"? what does it even mean???

i know charli's all about like embracing pop music but the tongue in cheek use of the word "pop" in the title is a little much, especially when it's just the word pop and then the number 2. the 2 likely comes from the fact that it's a followup to n1a and her second mixtape this year but it's a lazy title if you ask me. and i agree it makes no sense. she could have at least been clever about it and recycled the name too cute

[LonelyHeart 5,980]

i know charli's all about like embracing pop music but the tongue in cheek use of the word "pop" in the title is a little much, especially when it's just the word pop and then the number 2. the 2 likely comes from the fact that it's a followup to n1a and her second mixtape this year but it's a lazy title if you ask me. and i agree it makes no sense. she could have at least been clever about it and recycled the name too cute

"Too Cute" cover was fanmade and fake as hell sis. Even though the colors are wonderful

[champagnecigarettes 1,566]

Imagine getting 2 mixtapes + dozens of leaks and a good number of collabs all in one year and still managing to complain about something as trivial as a mixtape title lol we love self sabotaging here at chorliboards

[lonely lonely night 4,968]

"Too Cute" cover was fanmade and fake as hell sis. Even though the colors are wonderful

would love to hear your source on this

 

Imagine getting 2 mixtapes + dozens of leaks and a good number of collabs all in one year and still managing to complain about something as trivial as a mixtape title lol we love self sabotaging here at chorliboards

nobody is complaining, it's a discussion. charli releasing a bunch of music means i'm forbidden from having an opinion on the title of her new mixtape???? ok sis

[BeautifulAnywhere 5,417]

I always thought "Pop 2" was a play on words. I thought this since pop rhymes with bop so since N1A was a bop it'd be like pop bop 2. Or like a way of saying "bop 2 this"

[BabyBlue 677]

It's No Angel (1)

Pop (2)

 

"album title" 3

It's No Angel (1)

Pop (2)

 

"album title" 3

[LonelyHeart 5,980]

would love to hear your source on this

The "Hacker" told us during Discord + showed us the original shoot meant for XCX3 (which is the one with blue background that leaked a few weeks ago together with N1a shoot)

[HEARTCORE 18,971]

I think some of you are overthinking the title a bit

[lonely lonely night 4,968]

The "Hacker" told us during Discord + showed us the original shoot meant for XCX3 (which is the one with blue background that leaked a few weeks ago together with N1a shoot)

was there a cover from that shoot that leaked? those pics were used for promo. what about the too cute cover indicates that it was fanmade? 

[BabyBlue 677]

Or it was in the same year and she always planned two mix tapes

She's probs trying to make us forget Sucker happened.

[glitch diva 2,910]

"Too Cute" cover was fanmade and fake as hell sis. Even though the colors are wonderful

the photo isn't fanmade

[Golden 1,737]

The "Hacker" told us during Discord + showed us the original shoot meant for XCX3 (which is the one with blue background that leaked a few weeks ago together with N1a shoot)

this is so WRONG lmao. these are 2 different shoots and the too cute picture is a part of one of them

[AKA Lizzy Grant 2,238]

i know charli's all about like embracing pop music but the tongue in cheek use of the word "pop" in the title is a little much, especially when it's just the word pop and then the number 2. the 2 likely comes from the fact that it's a followup to n1a and her second mixtape this year but it's a lazy title if you ask me. and i agree it makes no sense. she could have at least been clever about it and recycled the name too cute

 

I forget who tweeted it but someone who worked on it implied that it means the second version of pop. For instance, it goes iPhone 5, 6, 7...etc.

 

Pop 2.

 

edit: It was umru (https://twitter.com/umru_/status/938550793543847936)

[BeepBeep 258]

Dancing on tabletops, Champagne bottles go Pop2®

I don't really care about the title of the mixtape as long as it's full of bops tbh.

 

Edit: It could mean next-level pop, something she's always been talking about.

[Joon 259]

too cute was just a booklet pic it wasnt the cover nor the title lmfao