Jump to content
Fluorine

Charli XCX

Recommended Posts

Charlotte Aitchison has some nice songs, but I believe she uses autotune too much in her singing.

Anyway, the fans seem to like it, but she has potential to become even better than what she is now.

Literally what is wrong with auto tune?


OAjeWdG.jpg?1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Charlotte Aitchison has some nice songs, but I believe she uses autotune too much in her singing.

Anyway, the fans seem to like it, but she has potential to become even better than what she is now.

It's not a big deal I mean I love how autotune makes her voice dynamic

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Charlotte Aitchison has some nice songs, but I believe she uses autotune too much in her singing.

Anyway, the fans seem to like it, but she has potential to become even better than what she is now.

 

Autotune is kind of the point of her music. I would compare her use of it to K*nye. I'm so sick of people thinking Autotune = bad, lazy, disguise to can't sing when in reality it is being used as an enhancement 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

One thing about We Are Born to Play is, where did the 320 kbps posted here come from? Is it even true 320 quality? Youtube audio is only 192 kbps so that's the actual quality then it couldn't have been converted.

 

That file isn't 320 kbps at all. And it's possible to rip audio off of YouTube that's higher than 192 kbps. You just need to use the right website. The highest quality you can get of this song is about 249 kbps. 
 
The fake 320 kbps file:
Screenshot-20200115-113459.jpg

 

The highest quality you can get until it releases: 249 kbps and reaches 20khz like a proper HQ file should. YouTube encodes audio in 48000 Hz rather than 44100 Hz so the spek graph is scaled up to 24khz instead of 22khz. 

 

Screenshot-20200115-113442.jpg

 

I'd post the link to the proper HQ file but I believe that would be against the rules as the song is highly likely getting released to streaming soon. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

That file isn't 320 kbps at all. And it's possible to rip audio off of YouTube that's higher than 192 kbps. You just need to use the right website. The highest quality you can get of this song is about 249 kbps. 
 
The fake 320 kbps file:
Screenshot-20200115-113459.jpg

 

The highest quality you can get until it releases: 249 kbps and reaches 20khz like a proper HQ file should. YouTube encodes audio in 48000 Hz rather than 44100 Hz so the spek graph is scaled up to 24khz instead of 22khz. 

 

Screenshot-20200115-113442.jpg

 

I'd post the link to the proper HQ file but I believe that would be against the rules as the song is highly likely getting released to streaming soon. 

 

Ah I see. I don't currently have access to the programs I'd use to check so I thought I'd ask. Ty! I'll remove it from the masterpost then lmao


XPo3CNC.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That file isn't 320 kbps at all. And it's possible to rip audio off of YouTube that's higher than 192 kbps. You just need to use the right website.

I think this website has a good ripping service but I think its not the same as u mentioned tho

... well if one day u could share the tool/website I'll be happy

 

https://mp3-youtube.download/pt/secure-online-converter

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Recently Browsing   1 member

×
×
  • Create New...