reputation

????

that's true, but she did 4 shoots with him and shot the UV video. oops! added in

Who do you think is Lana's best photographer? Why? Although 100 have shot her, there's 4 she usually stuck with. Chuck Grant (her sister) - Chuck Grant has done numerous Lizzy and Lana shoots. She has done Tropico, AKA, Blue Jeans, High By The Beach, Music To Watch Boys To, Ride and numerous Lizzy shoots. Francesco Carrozzini - Francesco Carrozzini, my favorite, has done numerous shoots with her including this unnamed shoot , L'uomo Vogue, Ultraviolence music video shoot and Glamour. He has also photographed people such as Nicki Minaj, Justin Bieber and Beyonce. Naomi Shon - Naomi is (or was??) Lana's friend, she has done multiple Lizzy shoots with her. She has also shot the National Anthem promotional and BTS pictures. Neil Krug - Neil has done both Honeymoon and Ultraviolence shoots, he has worked with Lana on other projects such as Maxim, Clash and Complex. Nicole Nodland - The most favored throughout the fandom, Nicole worked with Lana since 2010, with August 30th 2010 being her earliest shoot. She's done shoots such as Born To Die, Burning Desire and Blue Jeans.

26k views and it hasn't even been released yet. Iconic!

yeah. he saying a guy can't go to school because she's coming over and babytalking "dum dum" are great lyrics. the beat is so plain, it sounds like something in audacity. it's cute, but it's not good.

blasphemy!

What's the doing even about? The lyrics are so plain. The instrumental sounds like some cheesyt ringtone with pianos just added in.

Truly, honestly. There's not one lyric in there that's either cheesy or meaningless.

May be wrong, but I'm pretty sure Lana recorded 90% of her unreleased in London, maybe that's why

Everyone thinks LO is trash because it is COTBR is one of her worst songs. The theme and lyrics make no sense, along with the instrumental is cheesy.

The Other Woman is in her top ten. Don't know why it's so disliked

Very

ISIS are not terrorist nor do they commit acts of terrorism. They are puritanical and commit acts of puritanicalism. They don't correlate with any of the "evolved' definitions or the definition as of today. They commit these acts out of their extreme religious views. If they wanted to "create a climate of insecurity, to blackmail a government,to satisfy a hatred of a community, of a country, of a system.", they wouldn't speak of their religious views on their attacks. They are not terrorists. They are puritanical.

Don't like any of her songs. Her voice is really nice tho

Yachty is trash. I really could not imagine someone thinking he is a good artist

That's incorrect. In order for it to be "terrorism", it would have to be an attack with some sort of political agenda. Usually people associated terrorism with massacres or attacks including a bomb is because during Bush's Speech To Congress and many goverment documents refereed to 9/11 as terrorism and the perpetrators were labeled as terrorist. If it were by ISIS or any other extreme religious group, it would be puritanicalism. If it were to be carried out by a person for killing intentions, excluding their racial background, that would be psychoticism.

http://www.cnn.com/2016/09/18/us/new-york-explosion/

Yeah... Its called not honoring your contract. Sky wants to do things while the people who own her music and are the reason she csan release an album want her to do a different way. If she just cooperated, to your knowledge, the album would probably be out right now. That's like fighting with your mother, you may be right but they are the person who controls what you do and keeps you up.

"It is more likely a rightwing homegrown hater in the US who in the midst of the hateful Nazi-like Brown-shirt Presidential campaign Trump and Trump's aides are running, advocating hate and hatred against anyone, threating Hillary and her daughter (who lives like just 3 blocks away). some lone wolf(or professional taking advantage) then campaigns the next day that the nation isn't safe because of immigrants or anyone that doesn't back Donald Trump." Wow. And I thought this site couldn't get anymore left.

Drag me Isaiah!

Yes. The writing and story are very, very weak. Although he is good at appealing younger minds. Then again, it's a children's book.

If the mods ask me to take it down I will, but if you were personally offended by it that's your fault. Nobody even died, and everybody sustained very minor injuries.

no lol m'kay.

Highly doubt. ISIS and other extreme Islamic terrorist groups usually would kill atleast 5 people, rather than injuring many. ok. I don't care.