soaringHigh

Mean girls is the most slaughtered song in the album  i grew too attached to the boiler room vocals and beat and all, ig it's my fault..
 
now it sounds like a Kim Petras song, and it just sounds aged
 
the rest is really good tho sans i think about it all the time, that song is just plain out trash

where dem girls, where dem girls at

where dem girls, where dem girls at

von smash being one of the strongest on the album

Aye I don't like this, but I like it, but I don't.
 
don't get me wrong, it's really good when it's really good, I love Charli always, but idk what this aims to be?
 
Like it feels like HIFN and Charli, Crash'd themselves and came out as that myspace music back in 2006 that just feels incomplete and ver diy-ey
 
i am guessing and hoping for this to be the thing that aims for success/streams/whatever and there's a b-side of the same songs but for a club setting.
 
i'll still spin this as much as I can and blast it out in the car because it's really good but yeah..... I'm confused lol

Aye I don't like this, but I like it, but I don't.
 
don't get me wrong, it's really good when it's really good, I love Charli always, but idk what this aims to be?
 
Like it feels like HIFN and Charli, Crash'd themselves and came out as that myspace music back in 2006 that just feels incomplete and ver diy-ey
 
i am guessing and hoping for this to be the thing that aims for success/streams/whatever and there's a b-side of the same songs but for a club setting.
 
i'll still spin this as much as I can and blast it out in the car because it's really good but yeah..... I'm confused lol

Lol I am really not a hater, I've stuck around since Charli was opening for Marina back in the TR days and I even stuck ti Charli in the Sucker era (which was actually quite hurtful to watch but fun to go along with) and the excitement when Charli and Sophie debuted a whole new sound set in stone my love for Charli's ability to innovate and stay ahead of the curve always (even when she's sounded at her most mainstream). I do think she's perfected her craft so well and really very much love this new music. 
 
I was just pointing out or rather wondering what these artists hear in the process of making their records the influences they grab onto or rather find it interesting at what part in the process it becomes this pop cut with such polished detail because ever so often experimentalism tends to be a bit more chaotic and messy. But this album is in the line between using the interesting and detailed glossy experimentalism used in her "mixtape" era.... anyway just wanted to discuss all this with someone as no one in my circle really cares that much about this stuff as I do lol. 
 
 

No mean to be a hater or anything because I actually think 360 slaps in it's own way and I got Club Classics, VD, and B2B on my most replayed songs of this year but this album is just shaping to be another Radical Optimism case where Charli misleads people into thinking this will be a 'club' album. I mean yeah I can see this play in clubs somehowish but the club vibes are barely there and as I've seen others point out with Dua's new album, the psychedelic influences are barely there and if you look away for a split second you'll miss them. 
 
We're just getting glossy, polished, plastic pop with tinges of dance music and hell I love it (360 sounds like XCX World which is very bratty in it's own way) yet this seems more in line of a continuation to the $ellout era. This is definitely not what Charli described intially: 
 
evoking the illegal London rave scene where Charli XCX started performing "when [she] was 14 or 15"

Lol I am really not a hater, I've stuck around since Charli was opening for Marina back in the TR days and I even stuck ti Charli in the Sucker era (which was actually quite hurtful to watch but fun to go along with) and the excitement when Charli and Sophie debuted a whole new sound set in stone my love for Charli's ability to innovate and stay ahead of the curve always (even when she's sounded at her most mainstream). I do think she's perfected her craft so well and really very much love this new music. 
 
I was just pointing out or rather wondering what these artists hear in the process of making their records the influences they grab onto or rather find it interesting at what part in the process it becomes this pop cut with such polished detail because ever so often experimentalism tends to be a bit more chaotic and messy. But this album is in the line between using the interesting and detailed glossy experimentalism used in her "mixtape" era.... anyway just wanted to discuss all this with someone as no one in my circle really cares that much about this stuff as I do lol. 
 
 

No mean to be a hater or anything because I actually think 360 slaps in it's own way and I got Club Classics, VD, and B2B on my most replayed songs of this year but this album is just shaping to be another Radical Optimism case where Charli misleads people into thinking this will be a 'club' album. I mean yeah I can see this play in clubs somehowish but the club vibes are barely there and as I've seen others point out with Dua's new album, the psychedelic influences are barely there and if you look away for a split second you'll miss them. 
 
We're just getting glossy, polished, plastic pop with tinges of dance music and hell I love it (360 sounds like XCX World which is very bratty in it's own way) yet this seems more in line of a continuation to the $ellout era. This is definitely not what Charli described intially: 
 
evoking the illegal London rave scene where Charli XCX started performing "when [she] was 14 or 15"

K yeah she tookevery addictive drug she takes every weekend with her besties and put it into this song
 
and the lyrics are so cool, i love this 

K yeah she tookevery addictive drug she takes every weekend with her besties and put it into this song
 
and the lyrics are so cool, i love this 

K yeah she tookevery addictive drug she takes every weekend with her besties and put it into this song
 
and the lyrics are so cool, i love this 

Lol I am really not a hater, I've stuck around since Charli was opening for Marina back in the TR days and I even stuck ti Charli in the Sucker era (which was actually quite hurtful to watch but fun to go along with) and the excitement when Charli and Sophie debuted a whole new sound set in stone my love for Charli's ability to innovate and stay ahead of the curve always (even when she's sounded at her most mainstream). I do think she's perfected her craft so well and really very much love this new music. 
 
I was just pointing out or rather wondering what these artists hear in the process of making their records the influences they grab onto or rather find it interesting at what part in the process it becomes this pop cut with such polished detail because ever so often experimentalism tends to be a bit more chaotic and messy. But this album is in the line between using the interesting and detailed glossy experimentalism used in her "mixtape" era.... anyway just wanted to discuss all this with someone as no one in my circle really cares that much about this stuff as I do lol. 
 
 

No mean to be a hater or anything because I actually think 360 slaps in it's own way and I got Club Classics, VD, and B2B on my most replayed songs of this year but this album is just shaping to be another Radical Optimism case where Charli misleads people into thinking this will be a 'club' album. I mean yeah I can see this play in clubs somehowish but the club vibes are barely there and as I've seen others point out with Dua's new album, the psychedelic influences are barely there and if you look away for a split second you'll miss them. 
 
We're just getting glossy, polished, plastic pop with tinges of dance music and hell I love it (360 sounds like XCX World which is very bratty in it's own way) yet this seems more in line of a continuation to the $ellout era. This is definitely not what Charli described intially: 
 
evoking the illegal London rave scene where Charli XCX started performing "when [she] was 14 or 15"

Lol I am really not a hater, I've stuck around since Charli was opening for Marina back in the TR days and I even stuck ti Charli in the Sucker era (which was actually quite hurtful to watch but fun to go along with) and the excitement when Charli and Sophie debuted a whole new sound set in stone my love for Charli's ability to innovate and stay ahead of the curve always (even when she's sounded at her most mainstream). I do think she's perfected her craft so well and really very much love this new music. 
 
I was just pointing out or rather wondering what these artists hear in the process of making their records the influences they grab onto or rather find it interesting at what part in the process it becomes this pop cut with such polished detail because ever so often experimentalism tends to be a bit more chaotic and messy. But this album is in the line between using the interesting and detailed glossy experimentalism used in her "mixtape" era.... anyway just wanted to discuss all this with someone as no one in my circle really cares that much about this stuff as I do lol. 
 
 

Lol I am really not a hater, I've stuck around since Charli was opening for Marina back in the TR days and I even stuck ti Charli in the Sucker era (which was actually quite hurtful to watch but fun to go along with) and the excitement when Charli and Sophie debuted a whole new sound set in stone my love for Charli's ability to innovate and stay ahead of the curve always (even when she's sounded at her most mainstream). I do think she's perfected her craft so well and really very much love this new music. 
 
I was just pointing out or rather wondering what these artists hear in the process of making their records the influences they grab onto or rather find it interesting at what part in the process it becomes this pop cut with such polished detail because ever so often experimentalism tends to be a bit more chaotic and messy. But this album is in the line between using the interesting and detailed glossy experimentalism used in her "mixtape" era.... anyway just wanted to discuss all this with someone as no one in my circle really cares that much about this stuff as I do lol. 
 
 

Lol I am really not a hater, I've stuck around since Charli was opening for Marina back in the TR days and I even stuck ti Charli in the Sucker era (which was actually quite hurtful to watch but fun to go along with) and the excitement when Charli and Sophie debuted a whole new sound set in stone my love for Charli's ability to innovate and stay ahead of the curve always (even when she's sounded at her most mainstream). I do think she's perfected her craft so well and really very much love this new music. 
 
I was just pointing out or rather wondering what these artists hear in the process of making their records the influences they grab onto or rather find it interesting at what part in the process it becomes this pop cut with such polished detail because ever so often experimentalism tends to be a bit more chaotic and messy. But this album is in the line between using the interesting and detailed glossy experimentalism used in her "mixtape" era.... anyway just wanted to discuss all this with someone as no one in my circle really cares that much about this stuff as I do lol. 
 
 

Lol I am really not a hater, I've stuck around since Charli was opening for Marina back in the TR days and I even stuck ti Charli in the Sucker era (which was actually quite hurtful to watch but fun to go along with) and the excitement when Charli and Sophie debuted a whole new sound set in stone my love for Charli's ability to innovate and stay ahead of the curve always (even when she's sounded at her most mainstream). I do think she's perfected her craft so well and really very much love this new music. 
 
I was just pointing out or rather wondering what these artists hear in the process of making their records the influences they grab onto or rather find it interesting at what part in the process it becomes this pop cut with such polished detail because ever so often experimentalism tends to be a bit more chaotic and messy. But this album is in the line between using the interesting and detailed glossy experimentalism used in her "mixtape" era.... anyway just wanted to discuss all this with someone as no one in my circle really cares that much about this stuff as I do lol. 
 
 

Lol I am really not a hater, I've stuck around since Charli was opening for Marina back in the TR days and I even stuck ti Charli in the Sucker era (which was actually quite hurtful to watch but fun to go along with) and the excitement when Charli and Sophie debuted a whole new sound set in stone my love for Charli's ability to innovate and stay ahead of the curve always (even when she's sounded at her most mainstream). I do think she's perfected her craft so well and really very much love this new music. 
 
I was just pointing out or rather wondering what these artists hear in the process of making their records the influences they grab onto or rather find it interesting at what part in the process it becomes this pop cut with such polished detail because ever so often experimentalism tends to be a bit more chaotic and messy. But this album is in the line between using the interesting and detailed glossy experimentalism used in her "mixtape" era.... anyway just wanted to discuss all this with someone as no one in my circle really cares that much about this stuff as I do lol. 
 
 

Lol I am really not a hater, I've stuck around since Charli was opening for Marina back in the TR days and I even stuck ti Charli in the Sucker era (which was actually quite hurtful to watch but fun to go along with) and the excitement when Charli and Sophie debuted a whole new sound set in stone my love for Charli's ability to innovate and stay ahead of the curve always (even when she's sounded at her most mainstream). I do think she's perfected her craft so well and really very much love this new music. 
 
I was just pointing out or rather wondering what these artists hear in the process of making their records the influences they grab onto or rather find it interesting at what part in the process it becomes this pop cut with such polished detail because ever so often experimentalism tends to be a bit more chaotic and messy. But this album is in the line between using the interesting and detailed glossy experimentalism used in her "mixtape" era.... anyway just wanted to discuss all this with someone as no one in my circle really cares that much about this stuff as I do lol. 
 
 

Lol I am really not a hater, I've stuck around since Charli was opening for Marina back in the TR days and I even stuck ti Charli in the Sucker era (which was actually quite hurtful to watch but fun to go along with) and the excitement when Charli and Sophie debuted a whole new sound set in stone my love for Charli's ability to innovate and stay ahead of the curve always (even when she's sounded at her most mainstream). I do think she's perfected her craft so well and really very much love this new music. 
 
I was just pointing out or rather wondering what these artists hear in the process of making their records the influences they grab onto or rather find it interesting at what part in the process it becomes this pop cut with such polished detail because ever so often experimentalism tends to be a bit more chaotic and messy. But this album is in the line between using the interesting and detailed glossy experimentalism used in her "mixtape" era.... anyway just wanted to discuss all this with someone as no one in my circle really cares that much about this stuff as I do lol.