jealous girl

I don’t see it as a “believe her because she’s a woman” but more how the internet has been biased against her since the time his PR machine started attacking her, how we’re seeing the same exact PR pattern again, how glaringly obvious it is that people with connections to him are nitpicking at everything she has said in her complaint/suit (or really anything she does in life) but giving him a free pass on every inconsistency. Also the fact that his lawyer is going on talk shows to talk about this is so weird to me. It’s pretty obvious they’re trying to pressure her into settling before this goes to court - are they scared? And I’ve seen nothing about her editing texts except for the upside down emoji being omitted - which apparently the subpoena software does. He’s the one trying to hide that a message has been edited by adding a huge circle that crosses the edit note. 🙃. It’s also so weird how 80% of the comments on some TikTok/Facebook threads I’ve seen are essentially just thirsting over him; they seem to think she must have been asking for it / wanted him because they think he’s hot I wrote a lot about why I think he might not be innocent or as innocent on the other thread, might add it here if it doesn’t get moved. BTW I’m fully accepting that I might be proven wrong in the end, but right now I won’t be believing the word of some TikToker(s) who just happen to have the same shady lawyer as him.

sorry for the long rant but there are sooo many things about this that are making me believe he’s not innocent or the good person he claims to be, yet so many people seem to be blind to anything that’s damning for him • Him hiring the PR team in the first place (some texts between his PR team about ruining her are dated January 2024 way before anyone started questioning why they weren’t promoting together) EDIT: Sorry I read the date wrong somewhere, it’s been stated they were hired in July. But the fact still stands that he can’t refuse he hired them, he’s now trying to justify doing it • Him providing texts as evidence without timestamps • Him using her text saying she’ll meet the intimacy coordinator when filming starts instead of before as proof she refused to have one on set (???) • His evidence being full of irrelevant things seemingly to make the facts cloudy • Him asking her for her input then talking shit about her involving herself in the process behind her back (as shown in his own evidence) • Saying she edited texts when it was about an omitted emoji that the subpoena software doesn’t pick up anyways • The narrative that is being pushed of her falling in love with him, essentially pushing the “she asked for it” narrative • The video of the slow dancing scene showing her leaning away from him and suggesting they talk instead of physical intimacy, yet people twist everything about it to “She’s into him because she’s not a good enough actress so any on-screen chemistry is just her in real life”, somehow they always claim he’s acting and she’s not • Saying she broke character by talking when she was saying stuff like “Talking talking talking” to make it look like the characters are talking but then he is the one who starts talking about real life stuff • Her being “cancelled” for the “Wear your florals” comment when Sony had been using that line days/weeks before she said it • Him using her not having read the book as an excuse to go off script because she just should’ve known (movies differ from books all the time so I don’t find it that relevant if she didn’t read the book) • The Scooter Braun connection to his PR firm and the subsequent dragging of Taylor Swift’s name and morals (Side note, is she not allowed to believe and support her friend??) • Being a self-proclaimed feminist ally yet hiring a lawyer with SA allegations on his back, regarding a minor • The big TikTokers supporting him (and controlling the narrative) being connected to him through having the same lawyer I could go on… The worst part of this is how the message of the book/movie is the love bombing and gaslighting and the vibes I’m getting from him currently are exactly that

I’m pretty sure she was referring to the 2018 California wildfires, most specifically the Woolsey one that hit Malibu

I always associate this photoshoot with Black Beauty, I really wish they'd have used one of these for the B-side I think the first one was used for the YouTube leak for the song & that's why my head links these together

Anyways if anyone still wants to go (but with low expectations given the Limited View note on the tickets), these ticktets are about £106 which is the lowest price I’ve seen for seated tickets

I should have clarified that it’s not the entire sections but parts of them and all the seats are clustered together in what seems to be a direct line, but not exactly directly to the stage considering how the map looks? But pretty close to it

A bunch of Restricted View seats have dropped after the initial sale. They’re in the rows on the sides close to the stage, I’m quite curious why they are marked as restricted view… Anyone who has any insight? It’s sections 126, 229, 528, 141, 142, 250 and 551, specifically the last one doesn’t look like it should be obstructed?

imagine waking up one day and finding out you’ve been beefing with Billie Eilish on the lanaboards.com

My takeaway from her speech was that she didn’t feel heard (by critics) until she worked with Jack, he helped her get her point across in a way that people would understand better. I don’t think saying that takes anything away from her previous albums or diminishes the work of her previous producers. It’s still good music and a lot of people understood her (people like us who became her fans based on her previous work). It’s still a fact that a lot of people thought (and a lot still do if they don’t follow her work) she was only singing about sadness, cigarettes and old daddies before NFR when she finally got more widespread positive feedback from the industry.

It’s not a browlift, it’s just the way her brows are drawn/filled in (same as in the Born to die era)

I think what she really needs is a new choreographer or show director who can help her put her vision/ideas together into the larger picture of the entire show - so that the different parts flow naturally. Because there is vision there but could be better coordinated I think That being said I’d love to see her on stage alone with the band and without so many dancers and backup singers, like the old days, but I doubt that will happen because it gives her more confidence to have them there

It didn’t sell out before general tho, there’s still a few tickets available for N1

I think there was dynamic pricing but things were moving more slowly for the second date than for the first one maybe?

Does anyone know if Ticketmaster’s ticket quantity per household rule applies for multiple dates for the same artist? Like do the different dates (3rd/4th of July) count as separate events? <I’m not gonna do it girl I’m just thinking about it>

For Tay or for Lana? The prices for Taylor are what I found in news articles from when the tickets went on sale last year and Lana’s prices are from a message Ticketmaster showed once I got in the queue this morning