Lana Del Rey (A.I. Photos)

[Unidentified Major Tom 2,137]

On 10/4/2023 at 6:40 PM, LanaBalkana said:

I want to see their children

 

Granted :

(Pics were removed from Bing)

[Trash Magic 28,472]

On 10/2/2023 at 8:46 PM, Embach said:

this thread is the definition of @Trash Magic's signature except it's not even 2011 anymore

She knew what was coming

[Eugene 26,672]

5 minutes ago, fishtails said:

 

 

 

Dragonslayer 

[ChaoticLipster 24,734]

The way all our Displays pictures are going to be AI now 💀

[Veinsineon 77,847]

NEED MORE HONEYMOON STYLE ONES OMG

[LanaBalkana 6,783]

I just realised that all the other pop girlies have blocked prompts with their name. I guess Lana’s lawyers need to step it up, but yet I feel like she can’t be arsed. So far I’ve tried: Ariana, Rihanna, Amy, Adele, Taylor, Cardi - these are all blocked. Beyonce worked though

[bluechemtrails 27,325]

2 minutes ago, LanaBalkana said:

I just realised that all the other pop girlies have blocked prompts with their name. I guess Lana’s lawyers need to step it up, but yet I feel like she can’t be arsed. So far I’ve tried: Ariana, Rihanna, Amy, Adele, Taylor, Cardi - these are all blocked. Beyonce worked though

you can fake their names like Tay Swift and then it works

[Veinsineon 77,847]

2 minutes ago, LanaBalkana said:

I just realised that all the other pop girlies have blocked prompts with their name. I guess Lana’s lawyers need to step it up, but yet I feel like she can’t be arsed. So far I’ve tried: Ariana, Rihanna, Amy, Adele, Taylor, Cardi - these are all blocked. Beyonce worked though

Lana again proving she doesn’t need promotion and marketing because her fans invent the weirdest ways to spread her influence ….  she knows what she’s doing. And that’s solidifying legacy mama

[Olympia 4,436]

23 minutes ago, Unidentified Major Tom said:

 

Granted :

 

 

Didn't take long for her to start an affair with his dad obviously 🙈🤣

[ionut 9,608]

4 minutes ago, Veinsineon said:

NEED MORE HONEYMOON STYLE ONES OMG

i have many...

thats all cause im too lazy to post the other ones

[ChaoticLipster 24,734]

6 minutes ago, LanaBalkana said:

I just realised that all the other pop girlies have blocked prompts with their name. I guess Lana’s lawyers need to step it up, but yet I feel like she can’t be arsed. So far I’ve tried: Ariana, Rihanna, Amy, Adele, Taylor, Cardi - these are all blocked. Beyonce worked though

Lana’s sat here using it herself that’s why, probably making the album cover for LDR 10 now as we speak.  This is the women that uses pic art for singles covers.  Chuck’s probably gonna be the one that contacts any lawyers. 

[Veinsineon 77,847]

When AI can recreate this photo for us it’s soooo over lanaboards dot com

[Trash Magic 28,472]

This is beyond insane I cannot comprehend how much this technology has developed in such a short amount of time. I don’t ever want to take for granted just what a feat it is that images like this can be generated after the novelty has worn off–it’s actually, like, miraculous.

 

in its infancy when it was producing images that were clearly not-of-this-world it was exciting, it was like something the mind couldn’t picture itself. Now in the wake of this hyperrealism I think it’s a totally different ball game. 

 

I feel soooo icky about it. Especially the graphic and illustrative ones. Something that would take a skilled artist that has spent years dedicated to their craft weeks can be generated automatically. Although it relies on prompts which arguably require some basic level of “imagination”, it’s killing ideation, it’s killing the struggle of the process, of refinement, of problem solving.

Of course it’s a tool that can be used for moodboarding etc, I just feel like so much less value is going to be placed on skill, craft and taste going forward. Like how can this not proliferate a substantial area of our lives? It’s going to be so commonplace. We low-key need to STOP innovating. Let’s regress! 
 

no judgement on anyone generating them, some of these are really something. 

[ChaoticLipster 24,734]

6 minutes ago, bluechemtrails said:

you can fake their names like Tay Swift and then it works

Yep, here’s an example for Sheeran edward, 

[Olympia 4,436]

3 minutes ago, Trash Magic said:

This is beyond insane I cannot comprehend how much this technology has developed in such a short amount of time. I don’t ever want to take for granted just what a feat it is that images like this can be generated after the novelty has worn off–it’s actually, like, miraculous.

 

I feel soooo icky about it. Especially the graphic and illustrative ones. Something that would take a skilled artist that has spent years dedicated to their craft weeks can be generated automatically. Although it relies on prompts which arguably require some basic level of “imagination”, it’s killing ideation, it’s killing the struggle of the process, of refinement, of problem solving.

Of course it’s a tool that can be used for moodboarding etc, I just feel like so much less value is going to be placed on skill, craft and taste is going forward. Like how can this not proliferate a substantial area of our lives? It’s going to be so commonplace. We low-key need to STOP innovating. Let’s regress! 
 

no judgement on anyone generating them, some of these are really something. 

 

It's probably how painters felt when photography came up for the first time. I guess that's always the thing with new media. 

[lmdr 10,903]

Ok but the AI needs to stop using her 2012 face 

[Veinsineon 77,847]

8 minutes ago, Trash Magic said:

This is beyond insane I cannot comprehend how much this technology has developed in such a short amount of time. I don’t ever want to take for granted just what a feat it is that images like this can be generated after the novelty has worn off–it’s actually, like, miraculous.

 

in it’s infancy when it was producing images that were clearly not-of-this-world it was exciting, it was like something the mind couldn’t picture itself. Now in the wake of this hyperrealism I think it’s a totally different ball game. 

 

I feel soooo icky about it. Especially the graphic and illustrative ones. Something that would take a skilled artist that has spent years dedicated to their craft weeks can be generated automatically. Although it relies on prompts which arguably require some basic level of “imagination”, it’s killing ideation, it’s killing the struggle of the process, of refinement, of problem solving.

Of course it’s a tool that can be used for moodboarding etc, I just feel like so much less value is going to be placed on skill, craft and taste going forward. Like how can this not proliferate a substantial area of our lives? It’s going to be so commonplace. We low-key need to STOP innovating. Let’s regress! 
 

no judgement on anyone generating them, some of these are really something. 

I don’t see how it’s different than paying someone for a handmade item vs buying it off of shein tbh…. The demand for authenticity won’t ever die. It just means the normal ways in which things are made are being dismantled. If anything that should make handmade art more valuable , no?

[LanaBalkana 6,783]

2 minutes ago, lmdr said:

Ok but the AI needs to stop using her 2012 face 

I tried adding 2023 to see if it will work, but it doesn’t 

[bluechemtrails 27,325]

2 minutes ago, LanaBalkana said:

I tried adding 2023 to see if it will work, but it doesn’t 

maybe it works if you specify an age

[LanaBalkana 6,783]

7 minutes ago, bluechemtrails said:

maybe it works if you specify an age

Kinda worked and yet it didn’t really