Ultraviolence Reviews: 74 Metascore (DISCUSS REVIEWS ONLY)

[ilovetati 15,297]

75 with 21 reviews.

 

Still needs to add:

Billboard-83

Mojo-60

Chicago Tribune-50

[ilovetati 15,297]

I'm assuming that Rolling Stone just isn't finished with their review for UV, but I sort of hope that they forget to upload it.

[naachoboy 7,993]

I'm assuming that Rolling Stone just isn't finished with their review for UV, but I sort of hope that they forget to upload it.

inb4 a 70 lol 

[Manueldelrey 72]

The album is obviously going to end up with a final score of 70+, the reviews are very good only a few mixed.

[ilovetati 15,297]

inb4 a 70 lol

I'm going to guess a 3/5. Or maybe a 3.5/5 if they're feeling "generous." A 4/5 would be shocking tbh.

[ilovetati 15,297]

Also, is the New York Times not doing an official review because of their interview with Lana?

[Manueldelrey 72]

Metacritic updated, 73 with 24 reviews.

[ilovetati 15,297]

The only one missing is Mojo's 60, I think.

 

Still waiting on reviews from Rolling Stone, New York Times, The Line of Best FIt, NOW, No Ripcord, Paste Magazine, Sputnikmusic, Tiny Mix Tapes, MusicOMH. 

[Rem 2,392]

Boston Globe only an 80 ... I thought its a 90.

 

I mean writer said he would give a 90.

[naachoboy 7,993]

Boston Globe only an 80 ... I thought its a 90.

 

I mean writer said he would give a 90.

Metacritic decide which score.

[SweetLikeCinnamon 344]

Metacritic decide which score.

But they accepted that 30? How does that work? 

[naachoboy 7,993]

But they accepted that 30? How does that work? 

Boston Globe reviewed the album without score, so metacritic decided which one was a fair one .

[DeadAgainst 1,515]

The Freedom Land of the Metacritic 70's

[ilovetati 15,297]

Nervous about Rolling Stone. 

 

They will probably update with the UV review at midnight tonight or tomorrow, and it will be weighted very heavily due to the magazine's prestige. Maybe we will be pleasantly surprised.

[naachoboy 7,993]

Nervous about Rolling Stone. 

 

They will probably update with the UV review at midnight tonight or tomorrow, and it will be weighted very heavily due to the magazine's prestige. Maybe we will be pleasantly surprised.

a 10

[ilovetati 15,297]

a 10

 

 

That ain't happenin'.

[Rebel 3,176]

NME, 6/10

 

http://www.nme.com/reviews/lana-del-rey/15401?utm_source=twitter&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=lanadelreyreview

 

I think it's a fair review with fair points.

[FormerLanaFan 170]

NME, 6/10

 

http://www.nme.com/reviews/lana-del-rey/15401?utm_source=twitter&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=lanadelreyreview

 

I think it's a fair review with fair points.

”bohemian dimwit on 'Brooklyn Baby'”   

 

”But she conjures them with surface-level sadness worn like a shade of eyeshadow, which swiftly wears thin if you have no time for one-dimensional cads” - This is a typical Lana try hard shade, I'm so sick of it. Bombastic phrasing with little substance. ”surface-level sadness” = lame attempt to psycho-analyze her, yea, she knows how deep is Lana's sadness   

 

We all know that UV is better than 6/10

[Rem 2,392]

I wonder if Lana recent interview with the guardian (" I wish I was dead already") has affected the UK reviewers.

[slang 1,532]

NME, 6/10

 

http://www.nme.com/reviews/lana-del-rey/15401?utm_source=twitter&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=lanadelreyreview

 

I think it's a fair review with fair points.

I didn't get much of a sense of what the music was like from the review. There is one paragraph about it ("languid desert rock") and then the rest seems to be about artist attitude. The sense I got was the music might have been great but the artist's attitude spoiled it (the last line in the review actually), so the 6 in 6/10 tells me more about the reviewer's sense of the importance of attitude than the quality of the artist's work.

 

Waiting to see who (if anyone) will review/talk about UV at

 

http://music.thetalkhouse.com/