-
Content Count
3,413 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Everything posted by fl0r1dakil0s
-
i think fine china and a few others could be released especially if she goes in a pop direction, most would be better with a rework though obv as her voice has changed
-
i disagree.. if it wasn't for leaks nobody would know they were old songs. it's still her original work and she didn't intend for anyone to hear it back then. it isn't really her responsibility to cater her albums to what people decide to leak.. trust me, TONS of artists release tracks recorded years and years ago it's just that nobody knows about it.. like yeah it's "boring" for you guys because you're huge fans and listen to every leak but for the general public and the vision lana has for the album she (imo) shouldn't be judged or seen as lazy for using songs that didn't fit on previous records
-
i said "don't look at me girl" when someone asked me for clarification bc i literally cannot provide clarification 😭 i've only heard one song (that i am not meant to give details about) that i know will be on it and there isn't a confirmed date as far as i know. try asking ms. dragonwhore who apparently knows everything about ldr9 and has heard it before it is finished cheers x
-
five, i paid 4 of my friends (+myself obv) to pre-order one the day it was announced.. they all called me crazy but now they're worth a lot so jokes on them
-
why did i think this was gonna be a flo milli thread i was so excited to say DICKS UP WHEN I STEP IN THE PARTY
-
i've only heard one song that i know 100% will be on the album and i don't know when it's coming out for sure so don't look at me girl 😭
-
i have every single lana vinyl except for the born to die blue one i am willing to give a kidney for it, or more realistically one of my heart shaped lfl vinyls and a coke bottle clear lfl vinyl or maybe a UO honeymoon vinyl so lmk if anybody who has it needs a kidney or a few lana vinyls ok thanks xx
-
inbred is so underrated it is such a good song
-
listen to her 2nd album at night when ur walking outside it's chefs kiss
-
🪩🎆🧨
-
in italy
-
ok so my theory rn is that christina is in some sort of loop. this makes sense because the people she walked by in the city in both episode 1 and 2 are the same, and the screen that popped up on her bosses computer when they were on the phone had statistics like "continuity: on" showing for her. i'm conflicted over what kind of loop it could be though. in episode one guys passing by her said "i can't believe you've never been here before" similarly to the visitors in season 1. on the other hand though i think this could be a sort of "park" where the goal is for the hosts to become sentient. and maybe the "guests" are just humans controlled by charlotte's flies? this theory assumes that there's a time jump between charlotte/william's storyline and christina's. it also doesn't account for how christina seems to be writing people into the story unless each host had their own simulated park? which wouldn't really make sense i also have no idea how teddy plays into it at all, and how he obviously knows he wants to protect christina which means he has some sort of memory of dolores also i was wondering if maybe dolores getting deleted by rehoboam just means that she was like sucked into it, and that she somehow has some of its powers now in that she can literally write the lives of people in her world/loop/simulation? ALSO maeve and caleb's storyline? maybe they are in a timeline ahead of william/charlotte's like dolores (christina)? and he bought all that land and succeeded in making his (charlotte's) park? not sure why (seemingly) human's would be able to go there though unless it's a plan to replace them with hosts? which makes no sense bc it seems like a huge waste of money and time and there would be much better ways for charlotte to do that. i also have no idea about who led them (maeve and caleb) there and what they're meant to do there. tbh i truly have no idea where this season could go and i love it so far, it feels like season 1 westworld is back
-
this is lana's best look of 2022 (besides the gucci) and if she tours sometime soon i'm praying she brings this endless summer vibe back
-
and when u see the vinyl and it's a shade of fecal matter wyd
-
https://twitter.com/lil_lumba/status/1030321754978177025?s=21&t=AmFDFI7dF-mfEG333uQ-0A this is old but ive never seen this pic of her pls why did she ask someone for their scooter
-
Lana Del Rey Heardle #79 🔊🟩⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️ https://lana-del-rey-heardle.netlify.app/ threw up in my mouth
-
-
Lana Del Rey Heardle #78 🔊🟩⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️⬜️ https://lana-del-rey-heardle.netlify.app/
-
"i love u lots despite the odds" "it's not one of those phases i'm going through, or just a song, it's not one of them" "no more burning at both ends" "now my life is sweet like cinnamon, like a fuckin dream im livin in" "be young be dope be proud like an american" "you have no room for light, love is lost on you" "it's never too late to leave if u wanna leave or stay if u wanna stay" "all of my peaches are ruined, bitch!" "lies can buy eternity" "catch me if u can working on my tan salvatore, dying by the hand of a foreign man happily" "you hit that street and my crooked words, you count to three while they're all dying" "i love u lots like polka dots"
-
help that's not even her lyric
-
What are your Top 10 played songs of all time?
fl0r1dakil0s replied to Crimson and Clover's topic in Music
oh wow -
Supreme Court overturns constitutional right to abortion
fl0r1dakil0s replied to baddisease's topic in World News
oh yeah this is true. all the recent additions to the court besides amy comey barrett said roe v wade is fairly settled and they would likely not be overturning it. barrett did say in her hearing that she would not consider roe a "super precedent" (one very unlikely to be overturned) -
Supreme Court overturns constitutional right to abortion
fl0r1dakil0s replied to baddisease's topic in World News
i think you're a little confused on how the supreme court works - the supreme court never swears not to overturn any sort of precedent. lots of bad precedents have been overturned in the past. you are right that it is against the will of the majority of the population, but the supreme court isn't concerned with the population, they're concerned with the constitution. their job is to analyze and interpret the constitution in order to determine what it protects and which rights it guarantees to all americans. by overturning roe v wade, the ruling in which they determined abortion is protected by the constitution, they have made it so abortion is not protected by the constitution. since the constitution binds the entire United States to the amendments, abortion not being protected federally under the constitution means that it is now up to the individual states. while i vehemently disagree with abortion not being protected federally, it is not really explicit in the constitution, which is why im not surprised that it was overturned by an overwhelmingly conservative supreme court. for so many years the United States has missed chances to codify roe into law and it's really unfortunate that we took it for granted. i wish a constitutional amendment could be proposed but it would never pass because it needs either two thirds of both houses of congress to approve it or 2/3 of the states in america requesting it. while the majority of people in america support abortion, it isn't that simple because we are a republic and not a direct democracy. each state has their own say on the matter according to how our republic is set up, and just because the majority of people live in the larger blue states, our democracy is set up in a way that each state is equally considered in matters like this. anyways imo abortion not being federally protected is very fucked up but honestly not surprising -