Random Lana Discussion Thread

[kingk 537]

why even get dogs in the first place though? lol imagine just giving ur dogs away to a "random" bodyguard

 

the victim said she contacted everyone in lana’s circle, are we arguing that they have collectively decided to keep this information from her 

[Creyk 11,795]

Or maybe they had no reason to believe her one bit since her behavior is totally unhinged. Like who contacts the employer of their ex, and when they are turned away they keep going and trying? I tell you who: creeps and weirdos. It is also important to note that we only heard this girl's side of the story and the bodyguard had no chance to share his side.

[Lustformoney 41,576]

2 minutes ago, Creyk said:

Or maybe they had no reason to believe her one bit since her behavior is totally unhinged. Like who contacts the employer of their ex, and when they are turned away they keep going and trying? I tell you who: creeps and weirdos. It is also important to note that we only heard this girl's side of the story and the bodyguard had no chance to share his side.

You can’t be serious rn

[Creyk 11,795]

It is not Lana's responsibility how her hired security allegedly behaved or not behaved in the past. Should she just be omniscent and know everthing about everyone?

[creditcardromancer 781]

Lana is just not a good person. Marrying that trash husband of hers was basically the final straw for me anyway but this situation is truly disgusting. I can’t believe people are making excuses for her employing an abuser. 

[Bonita 12,774]

Everyone here knows about Lana's stance on domestic abuse, she's gonna fire his ass and it's sad to think that her story was ignored by some members of her team.

We'll see what happens she's gonna come out and say something for sure.

[bluechemtrails 27,821]

I think it's not so easy to fire if he's a teamleader, she has then to search for a new security company.

I also don't think she knows or cares much about what her security does in private, as long as they keep her estates well protected.

These security guards are all assh*les, you don't have much choice.

[evalionisameme 13,918]

39 minutes ago, Creyk said:

It is not Lana's responsibility how her hired security allegedly behaved or not behaved in the past. Should she just be omniscent and know everthing about everyone?

Y’all keep defending over everything- she can’t possibly know her husbands beliefs? She can’t possibly know how her staff are? Please…

 

I’ve gone overboard in the past but let’s just agree she’s a talented woman with a very dubious set of morale compass.

[evalionisameme 13,918]

Let’s be clear- Lana has allegedly more of a relationship than staff with this man: she’s bought him clothes and gave him her dogs which is not typical of an employer. This woman has messaged her family including her brother with proof for years and they still employ him with smiles in pictures.

[MrFameKills 11,149]

37 minutes ago, creditcardromancer said:

Lana is just not a good person. Marrying that trash husband of hers was basically the final straw for me anyway but this situation is truly disgusting. I can’t believe people are making excuses for her employing an abuser. 

Go away weirdo

The girl literally shouting out Blue Banisters in her post on X and y'all talking about what Lana did and didnt do...

[honeymoon is alive 23,418]

51 minutes ago, creditcardromancer said:

Lana is just not a good person. Marrying that trash husband of hers was basically the final straw for me anyway but this situation is truly disgusting. I can’t believe people are making excuses for her employing an abuser. 

girl why are you here then 

[Lustformoney 41,576]

Uhhh I wrote a comment under Ben’s post about why are they protecting an abuser and he blocked me

[evalionisameme 13,918]

15 minutes ago, Lustformoney said:

Uhhh I wrote a comment under Ben’s post about why are they protecting an abuser and he blocked me

I mean it’s Ben, he blocks fans for a lot less

[kingk 537]

every time someone on here criticizes lana, they immediately get shut down 

 

first, people are allowed opinions. second, accept the possibility of her mistake rather than blindly defending her, especially when all the information points in the wrong direction. 
 

THE VICTIM LITERALLY HAS A RESTRAINING ORDER AGAINST HIM. i think we can agree that lana would not hire some random guy or security team without professional security licensing, so would it not have been reported to her team by authorities? are there no regular checks in the US?

[jaesana 4,032]

has anyone looked to see if this man has a criminal record

[vicdelrey 739]

2 hours ago, Lustformoney said:

Uhhh I wrote a comment under Ben’s post about why are they protecting an abuser and he blocked me

really help

[bluechemtrails 27,821]

2 hours ago, Lustformoney said:

Uhhh I wrote a comment under Ben’s post about why are they protecting an abuser and he blocked me

Lana's safety is not necessarily Ben's concern, I mean, when it comes to her estates.

[vicdelrey 739]

ben deleted my comments and it's not a bug this time not them protecting the body guards 

[dexter 2,445]

5 hours ago, Creyk said:

Or maybe they had no reason to believe her one bit since her behavior is totally unhinged. Like who contacts the employer of their ex, and when they are turned away they keep going and trying? I tell you who: creeps and weirdos. It is also important to note that we only heard this girl's side of the story and the bodyguard had no chance to share his side.

she posted proof on Twitter, which company ignores allegations of domestic violence of an employee? it was so bad she even had to run away in the middle of the night, which btw happened in 2023 so after lana bought him clothes and gave him tex and mex.  the management team clearly ignored her on purpose to protect his job, and now Ben is scrambling deleting instagram comments about it. 
 

[dexter 2,445]

not saying it’s Lana’s doing, but she most likely knows about the accusations, I will be disappointed if he isn’t immediately fired and she apologises on behalf of her team for ignoring complaints.