viagra 1,642 Posted September 22, 2015 Edit: wrong thread and dont know how to delete this 0 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
veniceglitch 379 Posted September 22, 2015 MOJO 4/5 http://www.mojo4music.com/21803/lana-del-rey-honeymoon/ Counts for MC 0 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ExoticFlower 892 Posted September 23, 2015 With all respect for your effort there is no need to post any irrelevant ramblings about Lana's music. I think it's important to read the negative reviews as well, especially those with a snarky undertone so we have something to laugh about - we as a fandom can take it, no? 3 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
naachoboy 7,993 Posted September 23, 2015 spin 7/10 counts http://www.spin.com/2015/09/review-lana-del-rey-honeymoon/?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=twitter 0 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ilovetati 15,298 Posted September 23, 2015 Still at 80 without the Sputnik review added 1 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ilovetati 15,298 Posted September 23, 2015 79 now. Come on, Consequence of Sound. Pull through. Too bad the Lana stan isn't the one reviewing, though. --- http://www.slantmagazine.com/music/review/lana-del-rey-honeymoon Another 60 0 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Danube 89 Posted September 23, 2015 Going by Ultraviolence we're only through half the potential reviewers. I need this to get a few 90+ scores. Edit: down to 79. Luckily the 60/70 scores haven't brought her down too much., 0 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ilovetati 15,298 Posted September 23, 2015 Maybe Sputnik won't be added since it's just a contributor review 0 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
veniceglitch 379 Posted September 23, 2015 Maura Johnson has returned. http://noisey.vice.com/blog/lana-del-rey-honeymoon-review-essay 0 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
essiductonto 170 Posted September 23, 2015 really thoughtful review by emily yoshida http://www.theverge.com/2015/9/22/9370791/lana-del-rey-honeymoon-album-review one of the few critics who doesn't fall back on the usual cliches/narratives about lana. don't think it counts for Metacritic though? 0 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
LikeARollingStone 285 Posted September 23, 2015 My local weekly magazine gave Lana a bad review (AGAIN!) 0 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
a11111 528 Posted September 23, 2015 I think it's important to read the negative reviews as well, especially those with a snarky undertone so we have something to laugh about - we as a fandom can take it, no? They are incredibly boring in dissing Lana's music they aren't even funny anymore. The HM reviewing is becoming predictable. The UK writers are staning because they can better digest the slower pace and the US critics are yawning about slowness, sameness and they are nitpicking on lyrics (they don't know about her Billie tattoo ). If you want to learn about some sleeping pills read their stupid pieces but you will not find anything thoughtful about Lana's music. Don't dream about anything close to 80, I hope for a 75 at the end because I like HM more than UV 0 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
CatchTheBreeze 1,681 Posted September 23, 2015 Pitchfork is giving a 7.5 - that's not bad at all. (Better than I expected.) http://pitchfork.com/reviews/albums/21033-honeymoon/ But what happened to the 83 score from entertainment weekly on Metascore? 0 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
lazybooklet 575 Posted September 23, 2015 Why does every critic have to target Don't Let Me Be Misunderstood to the media? Like seriously can't it be a love song? It just shows how fucking shallow they are. And so is being confused between Lana being intentionally "lazy" on this album or she's just bad. Like seriously 1 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rdp 1,241 Posted September 23, 2015 That's a weird review from Slant, as they were big fans of Ultraviolence. Well, not much on their review of it but they put it in second on their best albums of 2014 list. 0 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
naachoboy 7,993 Posted September 23, 2015 Pitchfork is giving a 7.5 - that's not bad at all. (Better than I expected.) http://pitchfork.com/reviews/albums/21033-honeymoon/ But what happened to the 83 score from entertainment weekly on Metascore? its there already 0 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
PARADIXO 32,940 Posted September 23, 2015 Ugh I can't imagine it being at 70s... can it just be 80+ 2 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SuperMegaStan 9,985 Posted September 23, 2015 That's a weird review from Slant, as they were big fans of Ultraviolence. Well, not much on their review of it but they put it in second on their best albums of 2014 list. The year end list could be very different from the review score tho... 0 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
naachoboy 7,993 Posted September 23, 2015 Ugh I can't imagine it being at 70s... can it just be 80+ it wont probably 1 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
naachoboy 7,993 Posted September 23, 2015 it wont probably not that i dont want it to be 80+ 0 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
