kathyjonesxcx

what's that i hear? you were right all along 111? we should've joined your movement years ago? you clocked her so many times but we didn't listen? 
NO ECLIPSE! it's all part of the sky ferrire EXPERIENCE! you DON'T understand eclit! it's SO heroin chic when she acts like a junkie and walks off shrugging! take all my monies sky and sing me those 10 year old style over substance songs that you didn't write so i can feel my 90s depressed tumblr gay boy fantasea! yes queen i want that japanese jesus cawk! i love it when you sway around on stage trying to find the note looking like sarah paulson in american horror story season 5 HOTEL starring lady godga! who cares if you are literally just sitting backstage doing lines while we wait for you to start your show and we end up missing our train home! who goes to see THE sky ferreri and expects her to be on stage on time??? WHY would you want her to finish a full setlist? u fake fan! we know the real sky and she is the best!!! FUCK YOU CAPITOL!!! #MASOCHISM2024 NO PLEASE not the white room, it's all part of the experience, you can't lock me up PLEASE she needs my monies she is funding her studio sessions!! LET ME OUT!!! SKY I LOVE YOU!!!!!

And SUCKER was going to be Indian inspired experimental music and then a punk record!
 
Look, nobody cares. These songs have been bopping... do you have ears? Other girlies aren't releasing anything as exciting? These haters need to get out of this thread and go listen to Taylor Swift or Dua Lipa who are just doing very much of the same as always. 

The Gospel of Sis - sew chaos and speak facts from time to time.

Her 2019 fader interview I think really showed her true thoughts on it - that the music was ruined for her as soon as it leaked. Maybe the whole XCX world debacle was still super raw for her and she just wanted to focus on music that was actually coming out. But I think a lot of artists are missing out on extra streams by not taking advantage of the leaks.

Her 2019 fader interview I think really showed her true thoughts on it - that the music was ruined for her as soon as it leaked. Maybe the whole XCX world debacle was still super raw for her and she just wanted to focus on music that was actually coming out. But I think a lot of artists are missing out on extra streams by not taking advantage of the leaks.

Charli always plays remixes of the songs at club shows especially with A G. So I dont think anyone should assume that anything that was played at Boiler Room was them just hitting play on the album track. Most of the songs had other songs interpolated into the track so obviously that isn't going to be on the album.

She's talking about the entitled twitter gays that need every album cover to be an avant garde surreal image with a gorgeous female artist front and centre or else it's ugly, low effort, 'lets bully her into changing the cover' type of deal. The need for visuals from female artists to be solely them 'serving cvnt' and nothing else of value is where I think the misogyny part comes from.

She's talking about the entitled twitter gays that need every album cover to be an avant garde surreal image with a gorgeous female artist front and centre or else it's ugly, low effort, 'lets bully her into changing the cover' type of deal. The need for visuals from female artists to be solely them 'serving cvnt' and nothing else of value is where I think the misogyny part comes from.

She's talking about the entitled twitter gays that need every album cover to be an avant garde surreal image with a gorgeous female artist front and centre or else it's ugly, low effort, 'lets bully her into changing the cover' type of deal. The need for visuals from female artists to be solely them 'serving cvnt' and nothing else of value is where I think the misogyny part comes from.

She's talking about the entitled twitter gays that need every album cover to be an avant garde surreal image with a gorgeous female artist front and centre or else it's ugly, low effort, 'lets bully her into changing the cover' type of deal. The need for visuals from female artists to be solely them 'serving cvnt' and nothing else of value is where I think the misogyny part comes from.

She's talking about the entitled twitter gays that need every album cover to be an avant garde surreal image with a gorgeous female artist front and centre or else it's ugly, low effort, 'lets bully her into changing the cover' type of deal. The need for visuals from female artists to be solely them 'serving cvnt' and nothing else of value is where I think the misogyny part comes from.

She's talking about the entitled twitter gays that need every album cover to be an avant garde surreal image with a gorgeous female artist front and centre or else it's ugly, low effort, 'lets bully her into changing the cover' type of deal. The need for visuals from female artists to be solely them 'serving cvnt' and nothing else of value is where I think the misogyny part comes from.

She's talking about the entitled twitter gays that need every album cover to be an avant garde surreal image with a gorgeous female artist front and centre or else it's ugly, low effort, 'lets bully her into changing the cover' type of deal. The need for visuals from female artists to be solely them 'serving cvnt' and nothing else of value is where I think the misogyny part comes from.

She's talking about the entitled twitter gays that need every album cover to be an avant garde surreal image with a gorgeous female artist front and centre or else it's ugly, low effort, 'lets bully her into changing the cover' type of deal. The need for visuals from female artists to be solely them 'serving cvnt' and nothing else of value is where I think the misogyny part comes from.

She's talking about the entitled twitter gays that need every album cover to be an avant garde surreal image with a gorgeous female artist front and centre or else it's ugly, low effort, 'lets bully her into changing the cover' type of deal. The need for visuals from female artists to be solely them 'serving cvnt' and nothing else of value is where I think the misogyny part comes from.

She's talking about the entitled twitter gays that need every album cover to be an avant garde surreal image with a gorgeous female artist front and centre or else it's ugly, low effort, 'lets bully her into changing the cover' type of deal. The need for visuals from female artists to be solely them 'serving cvnt' and nothing else of value is where I think the misogyny part comes from.

She's talking about the entitled twitter gays that need every album cover to be an avant garde surreal image with a gorgeous female artist front and centre or else it's ugly, low effort, 'lets bully her into changing the cover' type of deal. The need for visuals from female artists to be solely them 'serving cvnt' and nothing else of value is where I think the misogyny part comes from.

She's talking about the entitled twitter gays that need every album cover to be an avant garde surreal image with a gorgeous female artist front and centre or else it's ugly, low effort, 'lets bully her into changing the cover' type of deal. The need for visuals from female artists to be solely them 'serving cvnt' and nothing else of value is where I think the misogyny part comes from.

Everyone is taking these tweets really seriously, and I'm like 95% percent sure it's a stunt. From the era kicking off with a list of ridiculous PR tactics she should try, to the tiktok of someone bashing her head against a sink because she's "tweeting" again that's posted days before she tweets this.
 
If the album rollout is going to be long, she needs ways to keep her name in the conversation, and sharing a series of "hot takes" that centers around her album cover, where every post is getting 1.5 million views within a few hours is a pretty smart way to do that. I think Charli can be a lot, but I also think she's a bit more self aware than most people assume.
 
People put too much stock into "will this controversy hurt her?" when controversy is currency in today's music landscape, especially when most of today's audience has the attention span of a goldfish. By the time the album comes out it'll end up being "She's a bit cringe/annoying but the album slaps", etc. 

i love her but she very clearly gets caught up on what critics/deaf gay men on forums say about her like... if any music magazine made an article about how break the rules is amazing shed start claiming it all of a sudden. she was right tho when she said that entire thing about being a brat means that youre also lowkey insecure...

the gays have no eye for creative direction. all they want is a superficial image that they can project their internal slay queen yas mama popstar wishes onto. no one cares about intention and original image making anymore! artwork is an extension of the music.
 
a-lot of artists try to adhere to an aesthetic instead of authentically creating something that feels true to the music.
 
 

the fact that the thought of Charli's tweet referring to both to the brat and Sucker cover arts hasn't even crossed your minds is definitely something 
 
disliking the brat cover art is not just about it being ugly and y'all know that 
 
back to the days of Sucker people would yelp about the mid original cover art without her face being trash 
 
then she gave us an equally mid cover art with the only difference being that her face was on it and then all of a sudden no one was yelping anymore 
 
does that say something to y'all?

It's almost like Charli is acting............ bratty 

this rollout is stellar idgaf what anyone is saying. her planting a seed about being a liar has me in a chokehold. the inability to guess what's real or not is drumming up so much conversation and anticipation, at least amongst fans. between atlantic perhaps finally seeing her as a true asset and charli's own recent public revelations about art (which i originally deemed as pretentious but am now finally starting to see the vision) i'd like to think they've finally hit a stride in which to work with each other. everything she's doing right now is performance art. i feel like every choice is deliberate - we are all talking (though i realize we're on a forum for fans so almost everything is overanalyzed) but a major label artist announcing an album cover like that might be a perfect blend between caricature performance art and guerilla marketing. i was a little cringed a month ago ngl but i'm sold whether it's genuine or calculated... i could write a thesis
 
charli is an artistic/marketing/popstar genius either way.... and the music is good so does it even matter!???
 
*i realize there's a matter of logistics to contend with to pull something like this off but she's been sitting on this album for a while i believe soooo... that "fake" album cover is literally the easiest possible thing to mock up for a vendor's website as a red herring (not that i mind the cover either way like i said i appreciate the artistic motivation of causing some discourse) and the release/shipping date on is literally just text on her own store website so... i am very much sounding delusional but that's marketing at work!
 

Can you just enjoy the music please