LiCKRISSH 1,117 Posted September 5, 2019 I love it.. needs an extended verison with another explosive chorus tho The beginning snare reminds me of Queen Lizzy lmao 1 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Veinsineon 76,498 Posted September 5, 2019 February 2017 is cute, but the features are very unnecessary. I sound like a broken record but do I look like I care?I have heard the song now and my pre-determined bias was, imo, very correct. 1 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Dum-Dum 3,514 Posted September 5, 2019 feb 2017 excellent as expected 0 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
expandableclitoris 9,091 Posted September 5, 2019 when eclipse said it was more experimental i was expecting something like this: didnt liked it tho 1 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wraith 7,277 Posted September 5, 2019 Her TOOTIMETOOTIMETOOTIME cover is great omg listening to it more than I listened to Warm https://dbree.org/v/7a7ea2 3 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
lipgloss 538 Posted September 5, 2019 omg it’s the one that i feel is the most of an evolution from pop2 so far!! 4 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Dima 2,592 Posted September 5, 2019 February 2017 is the best, wish it was longer 0 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
KillForLove 13,361 Posted September 5, 2019 When Charli XCX said “Hope I get one more chance. Hope I get one more call. I only know whats good once I’ve lost it all.” I felt that! 2 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
i pray for rain 232 Posted September 5, 2019 february 2017 sounds like a game boy that's about to self-destruct 2 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Time 1,772 Posted September 5, 2019 The first Charli review is here and it'd super positive: https://www.telegraph.co.uk/music/what-to-listen-to/charli-xcx-charli-review-futuristic-pitch-blockbuster-status/ 3 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Charlottexseax 7,928 Posted September 5, 2019 The Telegraph gave the album a 4/5, saying it will be big with fans, but not with the general public, as it’s too experimental https://www.telegraph.co.uk/music/what-to-listen-to/charli-xcx-charli-review-futuristic-pitch-blockbuster-status/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=ios_app Maybe I’m too accustomed to Pop 2 to feel it but it doesn’t seem that experimental to me so far WM is definitely as bubblegum as it gets so I’m really curious as to whether is a one off or there’s more than one side to this album 0 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wraith 7,277 Posted September 5, 2019 I hope Charli is as well received as Pop 2 was 1 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Veinsineon 76,498 Posted September 5, 2019 Maybe I’m too accustomed to Pop 2 to feel it but it doesn’t seem that experimental to me so far WM is definitely as bubblegum as it gets so I’m really curious as to whether is a one off or there’s more than one side to this album BIOYL was pretty Bubblegummy too, and from what we've heard of Official, it seemed to follow that bubblegum sound too. 0 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Time 1,772 Posted September 5, 2019 BIOYL was pretty Bubblegummy too, and from what we've heard of Official, it seemed to follow that bubblegum sound too. What did we hear of Official? 0 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
KillForLove 13,361 Posted September 5, 2019 BIOYL was pretty Bubblegummy too, and from what we've heard of Official, it seemed to follow that bubblegum sound too.The snippet of Official we heard was a remix/alternate version. The production on the album version is apparently completely different. Charli’s also alluded to it being a downtempo song. What did we hear of Official?The snippet that Music Mafia teases called “Types” is apparently Official with completely different production. 0 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wahyun 6,906 Posted September 5, 2019 wasn't expecting to love feb 2017 as much as i did, my favorite so far along gone 0 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
lonely lonely night 4,968 Posted September 5, 2019 i'm convinced none of us have actually been listening to the same white mercedes warm and feb 2017 have restored my faith in the album but these fucking features oh my god.. i know she needs them for streams and the album will have solo tracks but she honestly just weakens good songs with unnecessary guests (see pop2), they add nothing 1 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Toxo6969 942 Posted September 5, 2019 MY FUCKING COOCHIE HURTS SO FUCKING GOOD 4 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
deepseafishing 2,115 Posted September 5, 2019 the majority of the features on Charli so far seem completely unnecessary tbh....... 15 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
KillForLove 13,361 Posted September 5, 2019 warm and feb 2017 have restored my faith in the album but these fucking features oh my god.. i know she needs them for streams and the album will have solo tracks but she honestly just weakens good songs with unnecessary guests (see pop2), they add nothingI do agree that I feel like a lot of the features that we’ve heard already don’t really add much to the songs and are kind of unnecessary, where I feel like on Pop 2 (and even N1A) the features really added to the songs. 6 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites