Jump to content

Rorman Nockwell

Members
  • Content Count

    9,049
  • Joined

Everything posted by Rorman Nockwell

  1. It's a gun shop, right? Good tbh. I'd have a whole cabinet full if I were her, given all the freaks who try to break into her house n shit
  2. I forgot I signed up and thought it was a scam or a joke by one of my friends
  3. I mean she sang at their wedding all those years ago I don't like them either and take no notice of their antics, but I guess they're hard to avoid in Hollywood
  4. I'm not buying anything because Kartrashians but she sure looks good
  5. Love how she's all over our ads but never actually comes here
  6. He opened for Florence in like 2012 or smthn It was my very first show I haven't listened to any of his recent stuph tho Maybe I should because if Florence says, then okay
  7. I was thinking this earlier. There are some really well-considered, insightful posts on here. Those who take the time to post quality contributions deserve recognition
  8. Yeah and I mean you did nothing wrong by doing that cos I think we've all done that But it'd be good if we could get more variety in the nominations Anyways sorry @PARADIXO I did not mean to hijack
  9. But is it really a "genuine reflection" when people are just copy/pasting their friend and/or a well-known user into 10 different categories? Asking people to only nom a given user in up to 3 categories would force them to consider which categories they most deserve and imo makes it more authentic It's difficult to make the argument that any single user could deserve more than 3 awards a year when there are 20k people on here (and at least 250 of those post a few times a week). I think it should be about appreciation and acknowledgement, not ego stroking in the form of award sweeping No one needs more than 3 to feel appreciated and acknowledged ETA: there is also a very clear and direct correlation between how active someone is and how many awards they get. The year I got 7 nominations and won 3 awards was the year I was on here all the time. The same is true for you, Surf Noir, and for other users such as LanaDelRey who swept the awards in past years. I'm not saying people didn't deserve their awards or that anyone is doing anything wrong by voting for popular users, all I'm sayin' is: is this what we want the vote to be based on (cos atm it kinda is)? Or do we wanna take steps to make people think more about who they're nominating? I mean it ain't that deep but I think it's worth consideration.
  10. Yeah but this wouldn't really stop the sweeps (where ppl just put the same name cos they can't think of anyone else). Plus idk that people would necessarily remember/read who won the previous year Like every year our company does awards like this and all the people who work at the head office always win almost everything because everyone knows them (whereas a nominee from our office would only be known by others in our office, so they never win) As a result no one rly cares or bothers with it But I think more winners = more participation and more people feeling appreciated and we should definitely find a way to do that, however we happen to go about it
  11. To be fair, I think when I first joined, people didn't understand my humour and thought I was hatin' (although there may've been some genuine frustration because this was around the NFR era) I love you but you don't understand me ANYWAY congratulations to everyone else on the list but I personally think we should make a rule that you can't be nommed for more than 3 categories per year because: 1. I think people tend to forget names when nominating and reuse the same well-known ones in many categories. Like one year I had like 7 nominations including for best AND worst username 2. As a consequence of #1, users who don't post as often seem to be overlooked and that's a shame. Quality not quantity And 3. No shade to anyone on the list (I'm on there myself) buti t's boring to have the same people win everything It's more fun to share it around Just my onion
  12. This song and lyric are from when she was dating Sean Larkin and she'd go with him on excursions to the county jail and laugh at all the people who couldn't afford bail She followed this up by posing outside a jail with Jack Donoghue as a "fuck you Sean, now I go to jail with someone else" message "You try to push me out but I just find my way back in"
  13. I think they are already here and amongst us But if they worked out how to get all the way here then they're definitely smart enough not to reveal themselves
  14. Just a reminder that @Lindsay Lohantraded for LMLYLAW stems instead of for Honeymoon outtakes because Honeymoon "was a terrible concept from start to finish" We can't have nice things because of his bad taste Vote accordingly
  15. Didn't wanna be nominated ANYWAY Jk gl everyone Vote for @Lindsay Lohan worst taste I've never known anyone to have such horrendous taste Thinks LMLYLAW is her best song wtf
  16. Why is it so funny to me that, instead of a "buy now" button, it says CONTACT AN ADVISOR Just Chanel things
  17. Lana, Ben, Ed, and Jack (Antonoff) are all on Survivor. I am leaving off Chunk, Charlie and Rob because usually they don't allow relatives unless it's a special relative edition which this isn't Who does Lana vote off first, second, third and fourth, and why? My analysis is as follows: I am in Covid isolation and am bored as fuck so future analyses may follow. You're welcome.
  18. Vote @bunoner for worst username What even is a bunoner He just makes stuff up So annoying
×
×
  • Create New...