silver starlet 1,376 Posted April 19, 2014 lol to me is clearer actually. i know, i heard a totally different version at first though 0 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
naachoboy 7,993 Posted April 19, 2014 I just listened to this while playing the version Lana initially released simultaneously and it sounds exactly the same to me. Maybe I have bad hearing, but I don't think it sounds different at all its really different lol, its shorter, less backing vocals, less reverb, without the check 1 2 get it girl. 0 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Coney Island King 26,087 Posted April 19, 2014 So she sang a snippet or she sang it all but we only have a snippet of CW? 0 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sadcore 137 Posted April 19, 2014 its really different lol, its shorter, less backing vocals, less reverb, without the check 1 2 get it girl.Alright, well I'm not saying you're wrong. I did notice the fact that this radio edit is shorter since between verses it is cut down. Other than that I'm just saying I can't tell where you hear these areas with "less reverb", "less backing vocals" or the "1 2 get it girl" since I just don't know what to listen for to tell the difference. I literally had one earphone playing the initial released version and another earphone playing the radio edited version and both sounded exactly the same throughout excluding the shortened break between verses. But even when I sped up the initially released version to where the radio edited version starts the second verse I couldn't hear any difference. Could you possibly tell me what minute mark things are explicitly different? I really don't hear it and I am not trying to start an arguement with you Edit: double posted.. 0 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
silver starlet 1,376 Posted April 19, 2014 the mic check part is my favorite part so this version sucks 0 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Trinity 1,225 Posted April 19, 2014 Well of course the radio edit isn't going to be completely different lol it's the same song.. 0 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
naachoboy 7,993 Posted April 19, 2014 Alright, well I'm not saying you're wrong. I did notice the fact that this radio edit is shorter since between verses it is cut down. Other than that I'm just saying I can't tell where you hear these areas with "less reverb", "less backing vocals" or the "1 2 get it girl" since I just don't know what to listen for to tell the difference. I literally had one earphone playing the initial released version and another earphone playing the radio edited version and both sounded exactly the same throughout excluding the shortened break between verses. But even when I sped up the initially released version to where the radio edited version starts the second verse I couldn't hear any difference. Could you possibly tell me what minute mark things are explicitly different? I really don't hear it and I am not trying to start an arguement with you Alright, well I'm not saying you're wrong. I did notice the fact that this radio edit is shorter since between verses it is cut down. Other than that I'm just saying I can't tell where you hear these areas with "less reverb", "less backing vocals" or the "1 2 get it girl" since I just don't know what to listen for to tell the difference. I literally had one earphone playing the initial released version and another earphone playing the radio edited version and both sounded exactly the same throughout excluding the shortened break between verses. But even when I sped up the initially released version to where the radio edited version starts the second verse I couldn't hear any difference. Could you possibly tell me what minute mark things are explicitly different? I really don't hear it and I am not trying to start an arguement with you its just without the effect, its on the whole song. 0 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Titan 867 Posted April 19, 2014 Cruel World sounds gorgeous omg 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Arzi 1,982 Posted April 19, 2014 The last chorus goes I can see my baby swinging, his Parliament's on fire and his hands are up On the balcony and I'm singing, move baby, move baby, I'm in love I can see my baby swinging, his Parliament's on fire and his hands are up On the balcony and I'm singing, ooh baby, ooh baby, I'm in love I can see my sweet boy swinging, he's crazy and Cubano como yo, my love On the balcony and I'm swaying, move baby, move baby, I'm in love 0 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rdp 1,241 Posted April 19, 2014 They must have changed the audio, 'cause her vocals sounded totally different on the radio edit the first time I listened to it and now they're more similiar to the official version. "Cruel World" is such a cheesy title idk 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Coney Island King 26,087 Posted April 19, 2014 The last chorus goes On the balcony and I'm singing, move baby, move baby, I'm in love On the balcony and I'm singing, ooh baby, ooh baby, I'm in love I thought so! i go between the two but i noticed no one else i know who likes the song does, they just say ooh baby. 0 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
GangstaBoy 3,930 Posted April 19, 2014 There's a new song and you people are talking about WE's radio edit? C'mon THIS IS SO EXCITING I knew it was worth-waiting 6 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
GodBlessMe 2,141 Posted April 19, 2014 So Cruel World... http://Instagram.com/p/m8-dV4SEnZ/ 1 I AM MY ONLY GOD Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Wryta Thinkpiece 3,344 Posted April 19, 2014 Just played the radio-edit and went back and forth with the single version, the harmonies and vocals in the chorus are generally more sharp and clear; I noticed harmonies that I didn't catch before, and it's only cut by give-or-take thirty seconds so otherwise not too much is being missed out on. I honestly really like how her voice melts into the music in the unedited version, but I enjoy the edit.Anyway.So fucking stoked for Cruel World. WC CW are everything right now. I'd love if UV opened with WC and closed with CW. I can't wait to hear more of the newly surfaced song. I was expecting it to maybe be the UV-fied Hollywood's Dead, but I am intrigued either way. 0 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SweetLikeCinnamon 344 Posted April 19, 2014 WC...CW 13 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
tiffanydale 193 Posted April 19, 2014 I really really love Hollywood's Dead, but just because it has the lyrics "cruel world" doesn't mean that it's going to sound similar or have the same message. Besides, Lana likes to use the same lyrics in several songs (which is what I like a lot about her music tbh). 0 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Titan 867 Posted April 19, 2014 Here for AF,FA as a bonus track 0 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Bekim 2,576 Posted April 19, 2014 Omfg that snippet is giving me life rn fuck me to it 0 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sitar 22,214 Posted April 19, 2014 new rumored track title: cruel world source Rafael why you gotta do me like that new. thread. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mind Melt 10,095 Posted April 19, 2014 One thing I noticed in the radio edit was the first 'your love'. It sounds completely different than it does in the regular version. It's lower and less pronounced. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites