COLACNT

"i ask, perversely, about fucked my way up to the top" "now you're annoying me" __________________________________________ so he admits to being "perverse" (whatever that means); we still don't know how he posed the question or what the question actually was... but upon a second skin, i'm thinking he definitely wanted a reaction out of her

this is all so painfully true but somehow i don't think she gives a shit? or its like, she alternates between giving too much and too little of a fuck like she's so selfish and so self-contained that the outside world rarely 'break(s) through [her own inner] world" but occasionally when it does, she flips the fuck out and suddenly cares until she reverts back into her natural state a minute or so later? i legitimately think that's why she seems so fucking crazy. like, where is she today? in lana world or the real world? they're both equally visceral. and she's obviously capable of (and forthcoming about) inhabiting both spaces; its just that you (the interviewer or the fan) are unable to know which one she's in. maybe she wanted the fame but just isn't cut out for the press (on a consistent scale, at least) doesn't matter, really -- she'll always be polarizing and there will always be people that love her for it (and i think she knows this, too)

to be fair, we don't know that for sure. she's obviously incredibly intuitive; seemingly in tune with a different wavelength than most. i imagine that she's aware of subtle shifts in energy, microexpressions, etc; all of which fall heavily in line with what @@PrettyBaby was saying about being highly sensitive to social cues and/or feeling overstimulated on a consistent basis. lana said so herself -- people make her feel crazy. i'm sure this interviewer didn't say anything particularly malicious, however, it doesn't mean she couldn't detect some kind of malice in the periphery anyway even if she was correct in her assessment, we'd never know for certain. and what's worse -- neither would she! her meltdown was likely based on a feeling and nothing more. something unwritten and unspoken; essentially untranslatable outside of her own mind. but lack of concrete evidence doesn't have anything to do with the actual truth or the impact of the situation. she'd still be affected by the ~energy or her intuitions nonetheless -- feeling (and appearing) crazy in the process [and suddenly her interest in metaphysics makes much more sense after typing this all out]

i think people are still unsure of whether or not she's actually as fragile and insecure as she often (willfully) portrays herself to be -- so they poke and prod at her supposed tender areas because they're attempting to provoke and/or analyze certain reactions that are either expected or contradictory to what they already think 'considerable glamour', brains, beauty, and a seeming lack of inhibition -- what does this woman have to be so insecure about? the questions are so personal because there will always be that question of ~authenticity, regardless of what she says or does people just don't understand that most if not all of the characteristic attributes they (attempt to) impose on her are likely to be true and simultaneously untrue

that look in his eyes lmao

can someone pls link this article i have not read and cannot find

in terms of sheer symmetry and raw sexual magnetism i would say henry cavill brb

hmm. that makes a lot of sense, but i think i'm still being thrown off by his wording? "we're so used to that, we play that game really well" almost as if it really had nothing to do with being in the spotlight. it seems as if he included himself in the 'game', as if he were referring to something general and... human? i'm also confused because the comment was delivered in such a nonchalant manner @@evilentity? help pls

but i don't understand why he referred to it as a game? i'm still not even sure i understand what games are

can someone explain to me what he meant when he said: "it couldn't have been just that people were irritated by the projection of a beautiful loser persona... cause we're so used to that. we play that game really well." we're so used to what, exactly? what game, exactly? i don't understand certain things about unspoken, 'adult' dynamics and so i'm thinking this may be one of them

i love how much of her process is dictated by abstractions; singular colors, vibes etc -- all very intuitive inclinations

http://lanaboards.com/index.php?/topic/473-lanalysis-relating-songs-to-knownassumed-relationships/

the world is grey and so is she !

"me and god we don't get along" i.e i acknowledge my relationship with him; he's a part of my existence, but i don't necessarily have the ~healthiest connection with him at every moment of my life? he looms over, and i feel him with me, but i don't do his bidding or impose his beliefs on myself or on others she seems like she would be buddhist tbh

i'm telling you this bitch feels nothing but undercurrents of abstract emotion every now and then, and everything else is ruled by her head i think there has to be some kind of inverse relationship with emotionality and incisive eloquence in communication. she's so good at articulating herself, but most of that is an intellectual process. i think she's confusing because there's such a vast disconnect between what she feels and what she thinks, whereas with most people, the two processes are more intertwined (rather than paradoxical) a lot of elements probably factor into the outcome of the interview too. how her day is going, the vibe of the interviewer, whether she feels more emotional or more numb, etc on that particular day. maybe her connection with god is more spiritual (abstract) but detached (mentally); and on this particular day she decided to share her more rational perspective on the matter? who knows with her bipolar ass

it came straight from her mouth. u might be biased tbh

if barrie was ~dark before i wonder what he's like now ... i get sad when she doesn't update her twitter lel

what kind of cold ass questions

did you post this with the realization in mind that these were the exact clips used in her diet mtn dew video(s)?

how? she may have used special effects in the past, but they were never so obvious (i.e the alligator in blue jeans, etc) overt CGI is antithetical to the whole stripped back, retro aesthetic. its cheap and trashy, but not in a subversive, john waters type of way. its too in-your-face and it doesn't leave any room for analysis or nuance it doesn't fit lana at all?

why does she keep doing these superimposed effects i love her dancing its so adorable she's so adorable and sexy i can barely even handle it and i don't even like pussy i can't imagine being straight and watching this video. but why do you bother with CGI lana stop it

upload that shit pls ~lanaboards loyalty

unless that was your CD, no

stupid cunt

can someone fucking fuck