SuperMegaStan 9,978 Posted January 22, 2019 rooting for the favourite and ROMA and isle of dogs 1 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Amadeus 11,333 Posted January 22, 2019 olivia, emma/rachel, and the favourite snatching whewwww the favourite snatching BP would be “unexpected” idk it feels too weird for the academy but i’d be here for it 1 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BluVelvUnderground 1,754 Posted January 22, 2019 I did much worse predicting this year's compared to last year's. 0 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Charlottexseax 7,917 Posted January 22, 2019 I did much worse predicting this year's compared to last year's. i mean the academy pull the noms out of their asses 2 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jvcx 3,644 Posted January 22, 2019 Well the noms are quite underwhelming though not unexpected tbh. This is the first year in a few when I can't watch the actual awards ceremony live because of work which I'm pissed about but with these nominations I'm not as sad about it. 1 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ChaoticLipster 24,539 Posted January 22, 2019 Gaga will win best song and Glen Close best actress as she really deserves it more she’s been nominated so many times. Gaga has plenty of time to win it. 0 Quote Arches are Illusions solid at first glance Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BluVelvUnderground 1,754 Posted January 22, 2019 Well the noms are quite underwhelming though not unexpected tbh. This is the first year in a few when I can't watch the actual awards ceremony live because of work which I'm pissed about but with these nominations I'm not as sad about it. Yeah, even the surprises were kind of expected (other than that shocker in supporting actress.) Overall, I'm not even much of a fan of most of them, so I'm not even rooting for much of anything. Bummed Ethan Hawke missed in Actor. 1 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Tragic Rabbit 3,355 Posted January 22, 2019 . 0 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
graham4anything 2,859 Posted January 22, 2019 RBG will win best documentary (that they didn't nominate "Won't you be my neighbor" insures that. May RBG live longer than the fraud in offices one-term.) Spike will take Best Adaptation & possibly Director Cuaron most likely Foreign Film and Screenplay Movie may go to Green though it would be cool if Black Panther won but why wasn't Ryan C nominated for best director? Supporting Actor Ali though wouldn't mind if Sam Elliott won Supporting Actress Rachel Actor Bale or Viggo Actress Glenn Close because of her academy worthy Golden Globes speech (if one thinks that wasn't memorized by the "greatest actress of her time") but she deserves an Oscar anyhow for many things including The Natural. As they probably can't have ties anymore, it would be cool if Glenn and Gaga both won (and Gaga probably will win song) I am not of the opinion that Rami deserves the award. Freddie was an original. Rami is nothing more than a copy. Not to mention they fudged the truth. Looking forward for the Elton movie. 0 Quote Lana is our modern day Edith Piaf. Totally unique. a mixture of Brian WIlson Roy Orbison, Leonard Cohen, Gram Parsons, Elton & Bernie. Born to Die/Paradise is comparable to Elton's Captain Fantastic. All the records need to be listened whole. Waiting for a box set vinyl of all 400 songs not on any lp Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TheBoss 13,477 Posted January 22, 2019 I'm honestly ok with almost anything, except Hereditary, Ari Aster and Toni Collette getting snubbed. I'm the most excited about best animated picture because almost all the nominees are so solid 1 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Amadeus 11,333 Posted January 22, 2019 green puke, bohemian catastrophe and Lice all competing for best picture i-.... 0 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
clementines 9,868 Posted January 22, 2019 i really didnt like bohemian rhapsody i dont think it should win anything except for best actor for rami because he snapped 0 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Trash Magic 28,278 Posted January 22, 2019 I will root for Amy Adams in anything. The Lana of movies 1 Quote "It's 2011, and we should all be aware of exactly how fast technology is developing" - Lana Del Rey Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kitschesque 9,881 Posted January 22, 2019 A Star Is Born was decent enough but all this recognition is white noise wtf I thought Golden Globes were a moment in time but I guess the Academy lost their minds as well 0 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BluVelvUnderground 1,754 Posted January 22, 2019 A Star Is Born was decent enough but all this recognition is white noise wtf I thought Golden Globes were a moment in time but I guess the Academy lost their minds as well To be honest, outside of horror and foreign films, it was a pretty weak year, overall. And we know they have one or two foreign films they focus on a year - and they are hard on horror, so it's not surprising, honestly. They've always been "lost" in some fashion. 0 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BluVelvUnderground 1,754 Posted January 23, 2019 Just a random fun fact. Possibly nobody else cares, but I found it interesting. Both Sam Elliott and Sam Rockwell - with their nominations, respectively, for A Star Is Born and Vice - have become two of the five shortest performances to ever be nominated for the Supporting Actor Oscar. Both performances have yet to be timed, but the record for this has been held by Ned Beatty in Network from 1976, who was only in his film for 6 minutes and still got the nomination. Elliott is speculated to have between 6 to 7 minutes, placing him in the top 5 in terms of the shortest. Rockwell does, too, although it's actually very much possible that Rockwell was in his film for less than 6 minutes, meaning his work as George W. Bush in Vice could very well be the shortest performance to have ever been nominated for Supporting Actor (which also places him in the 5 shortest performances to ever be nominated in any category at the Oscars in history.) Even then, Elliott and Rockwell are the first performances in Supporting Actor since 1977 to crack the shortest five. Just interesting, since there's been some criticism on them for being borderline "cameos". It's been almost half-a-century since the Academy has recognized them this short, and again, Rockwell may hold the new record. His role in Vice consists of small scenes where he appears briefly, with only one major scene where he talks with Christian Bale while eating chicken. So yes. Sam Rockwell got nominated for a cameo for playing George W. Bush eating fried chicken. 0 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BluVelvUnderground 1,754 Posted January 23, 2019 the only thing Lice deserved is a 1 star ranking bc that film was utter trash elliott doing nothing for 5 of his 6 minutes of screen time Eh, I thought Elliott was restrained, subtle, and showed emotion in his minimal screentime. I have yet to see Vice. Have you? What all does Rockwell do in it? 0 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Amadeus 11,333 Posted January 23, 2019 Eh, I thought Elliott was restrained, subtle, and showed emotion in his minimal screentime. I have yet to see Vice. Have you? What all does Rockwell do in it? i have seen it and erased it from my memory 0 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Amadeus 11,333 Posted January 23, 2019 the way nicholas hoult got completely snubbed this awards season despite doing twice as much as both sams combined 0 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites