Valerie

The difference 1 person can make is actually astounding if u consider Greta Thunberg but OK, Lana flying around in her unnecessary private jet while whining about climate change in interviews isn't hypocritical at all lmao
 
Lana has absolutely no reason to fly around in a private jet, period
 
Isn't ur friend Elle a vegan? Are u going to tell her to stop being a vegan because 1 person doesn't make a difference?

Lana acting concerned about the environment despite her personal carbon footprint being massive through use of yachts and private jets alone is laughable
 
The use of private jets is hardly ever necessary outside of medical emergencies and, on a more controversial level, heads of state
 
By using them u are producing 10 times the amount of carbon per passenger
 
A 2 hour flight on her private jet will amount to approx 5.2 tonnes of CO2, so 10.4 tonnes for the return flight, we are recommended to multiply that initial figure by 1.9, which makes the total sum even higher, meaning from just one return private flight, Lana is already using up three times more tonnes than the average citizens yearly emissions
 
Therefore Lana's personal carbon footprint is much higher in comparison, which is not even a question, especially considering she has far less people aboard in comparison to a commercial jet. The idea is that Lana is so privileged she can z00m0z00m her private jet around while paying for offset (which is the equivalent of abusing a woman but then donating to women's shelters to rectify it) but the thing is, average people cannot do that and would instead need to decrease consumption meaning they will have issues with higher prices. So, Lana is out of touch because she will not have to tackle the consequences of her forthcoming policies the same way a normal person would

Maybe the way that I'm living
Is killing the environment
 

One person can influence others to make changes, which was the point in mentioning Greta Thunberg who has garnered up to 7 million protesters ww
 
Defending someone who uses private jets regularly (while they complain about climate change in interviews, no less) because "one person won't make a difference!1!1" is the logical fallacy here
 
Evidently when speaking of global greenhouse gas emissions the AVERAGE single person's contribution would be minuscule
 
However
 
The privileged population are proven to be responsible for 50% of emissions and a lot of that is due to their flying methods
 
Lana is a part of that
 
Therefore, if she wants actual changes to start happening, why doesn't she start by applying them to her personal life, while also actually saying something of substance rather than "people who are pro-environment have lovely voices" as this interview suggests?
 
Lana enjoys dipping her toes in, but so rarely follows through with said beliefs. One could take ur argument and actually flip it: since u consider one person's actions so irrelevant, whether it is climate change or veganism, what's the point in Lana's "lovely voices" words? It amounts to nothing, far more so than a single person's actions would. And, if she feels so strongly about it, why does she fly in private jets routinely? 

Imagine having that mindset...yikes

Heart shaped box did star signs better!!!!!!

She talks about how great her Jones Beach show was in the interview & the journalist said that show was held the weekend prior to the interview

Imagine having that mindset...yikes

Heart shaped box did star signs better!!!!!!

Heart shaped box did star signs better!!!!!!

She talks about how great her Jones Beach show was in the interview & the journalist said that show was held the weekend prior to the interview

Heart shaped box did star signs better!!!!!!

Heart shaped box did star signs better!!!!!!

Heart shaped box did star signs better!!!!!!

Heart shaped box did star signs better!!!!!!

Lana acting concerned about the environment despite her personal carbon footprint being massive through use of yachts and private jets alone is laughable
 
The use of private jets is hardly ever necessary outside of medical emergencies and, on a more controversial level, heads of state
 
By using them u are producing 10 times the amount of carbon per passenger
 
A 2 hour flight on her private jet will amount to approx 5.2 tonnes of CO2, so 10.4 tonnes for the return flight, we are recommended to multiply that initial figure by 1.9, which makes the total sum even higher, meaning from just one return private flight, Lana is already using up three times more tonnes than the average citizens yearly emissions
 
Therefore Lana's personal carbon footprint is much higher in comparison, which is not even a question, especially considering she has far less people aboard in comparison to a commercial jet. The idea is that Lana is so privileged she can z00m0z00m her private jet around while paying for offset (which is the equivalent of abusing a woman but then donating to women's shelters to rectify it) but the thing is, average people cannot do that and would instead need to decrease consumption meaning they will have issues with higher prices. So, Lana is out of touch because she will not have to tackle the consequences of her forthcoming policies the same way a normal person would

Maybe the way that I'm living
Is killing the environment
 

The threat of climate change as she flies around in a private jet

Heart shaped box did star signs better!!!!!!

Heart shaped box did star signs better!!!!!!

Maybe the way that I'm living
Is killing the environment
 

At the risk of some hypocrisy myself-- I love to travel and last year took a single vacation with 8 (coach) flights half-way around the world-- Lana's use of a private jet while she warns about climate change is not cool.
 

Would be nice to read this interview before the world burns.  

Assuming by "the window opposite" she means a browser window open to one of @@YUNGATA 's bathtime tinychats. I don't wanna know I'm wrong.

Heart shaped box did star signs better!!!!!!

Heart shaped box did star signs better!!!!!!

Lana acting concerned about the environment despite her personal carbon footprint being massive through use of yachts and private jets alone is laughable
 
The use of private jets is hardly ever necessary outside of medical emergencies and, on a more controversial level, heads of state
 
By using them u are producing 10 times the amount of carbon per passenger
 
A 2 hour flight on her private jet will amount to approx 5.2 tonnes of CO2, so 10.4 tonnes for the return flight, we are recommended to multiply that initial figure by 1.9, which makes the total sum even higher, meaning from just one return private flight, Lana is already using up three times more tonnes than the average citizens yearly emissions
 
Therefore Lana's personal carbon footprint is much higher in comparison, which is not even a question, especially considering she has far less people aboard in comparison to a commercial jet. The idea is that Lana is so privileged she can z00m0z00m her private jet around while paying for offset (which is the equivalent of abusing a woman but then donating to women's shelters to rectify it) but the thing is, average people cannot do that and would instead need to decrease consumption meaning they will have issues with higher prices. So, Lana is out of touch because she will not have to tackle the consequences of her forthcoming policies the same way a normal person would