fagmobs

"Give us Mess and Jungle"
 
"Stop sharing Heartbreak High we don't condone that"

"Give us Mess and Jungle"
 
"Stop sharing Heartbreak High we don't condone that"

"Give us Mess and Jungle"
 
"Stop sharing Heartbreak High we don't condone that"

"Give us Mess and Jungle"
 
"Stop sharing Heartbreak High we don't condone that"

Welcome to CharliBoards!; but If you're not looking to share it then you really shouldn't have brought it up.

I mean I get the aversion to it leaking but sometimes you guys (generalization) get way too upset about it. 
Either way I love you all no matter what okay. T-T 90% of my time on LB is spent here so I don't want anyone to get too upset with each other.  

Omg I'm done with this lol. Us talking about Heartbreak High isn't going to do ANYTHING! The last time I checked I didn't have access to a song purely by hearing talk about it. I just can't anymore. Some of you all act like we are sharing Charli's sex tape and commenting on how it looks. IT'S A FREAKING UNRELEASED SONG. And it will stay that way unless put on an album, where what we have will become a DEMO because I guarantee it won't be the same version as what we have now. Bye.

It's good but I wouldn't say it's a favorite. It's a bit too repetitive for me. I'd say it's somewhere in the middle. I like the 80's sound though.

I think HH is really good! My boyfriend liked it too. It kinda fits good with Interior tbh. I wouldn't mind an album with tracks like that.

All that year info is nice, and most of it os right, but there are some without definite dates. Charli was very finicky about yploading her tracks; she'd upload one version of a song, take it down, and upload another one later. This is why it's VERY hard to pinpoint what year a song is from, let alone its producer...for example, there are at least two separate versions of 'Do It Well,' probably three, yet we don't even know which one the leaked version is! Similarly, 'Dinosaur Sex!' was posted to the Hype Machine in 2009, and that's where we have it from, but there's no way to tell when it was originally posted.
 
And don't even get me started on the trafic mess of 'Valentine.'

You're the One is the second worst song on the album, behind the horrid rendition of Set Me Free. I just don't understand how you can take such an amazing demo and ruin it entirely?? But yeah, I find You're the One really boring. I can't at seeing someone (sorry, on mobile and don't remember their name) say Stay Away is repetitive... YTO is like the epitome of repetitive. I do like the demo of it though.

Did you just call Stay Away repetitive and You're the One not? Stay Away does laps on You're the One lyrically. Stay Away has verses that connect to the chorus and add to the song as a whole, while You're the One's verses are just sort of.....there.

"You're the One" is my least favorite on the album as well. I still don't understand why it was released as a main single and after months of listening I still cannot get into it whatsoever.

I like it, but it's not the best.
 
It's very lyrically repetitive to where it feels like it's just a loop of the chorus.
 
If I had to pick a previously released track as my favorite it would be Nuclear Seasons

You really can't compare True Romance and 14 lyrically or sonically. Each album set out with two different goals, and two different set sounds. 14 was more just Charli making the music "she wanted to hear", while it was a bit more acoustic than we had expected, I don't think its quite fair to compare it True Romance and vice versa. True Romance was from the start and electro-pop record about love, while 14 was more just an album of songs Charli wrote and liked, there wasn't a strong theme, so while you could argue that the lyrics from 14 are more heartfelt, True Romance was written with a bit more restriction. However its also not fair to completely rule out 14 because of the lack of co-writers and producers, not to mention label backing. So what I 'm trying to get at is that it's not really correct to claim that one is "better" than the other unless talking about it from an opinion standpoint.

You really can't compare True Romance and 14 lyrically or sonically. Each album set out with two different goals, and two different set sounds. 14 was more just Charli making the music "she wanted to hear", while it was a bit more acoustic than we had expected, I don't think its quite fair to compare it True Romance and vice versa. True Romance was from the start and electro-pop record about love, while 14 was more just an album of songs Charli wrote and liked, there wasn't a strong theme, so while you could argue that the lyrics from 14 are more heartfelt, True Romance was written with a bit more restriction. However its also not fair to completely rule out 14 because of the lack of co-writers and producers, not to mention label backing. So what I 'm trying to get at is that it's not really correct to claim that one is "better" than the other unless talking about it from an opinion standpoint.

Since I'm tired of the "It wasn't suposse to be online" "Charli doesn't want those songs out" "Poor Charli"
 
I'm going to ask you something, for those who bought the album, but you are free to answer if you want...
 
If Charli didn't want to release the album or didn't want her fans to hear it and stuff.
 
Y THE FUCK DID YOU BOUGHT IT IN FIRST PLACE? If those songs weren't suposse to be out, what thing makes u special enugh to have it? I mean the leaker paid the $100 for it, unlike you guys who make a group and bought it. That makes u look selfish.
 
I'm not hatin' I'm just telling you
 
As KissCharliKiss on Tumblr said
 

Congratulations on 100 pages of this trainwreck thread! Mind if I rename it to "The Clusterfuck Thread 2.0"?
#FirstCharliBoardsPost