Jeanne Dielman

I don't think that BOZ meant that we won't be able to enjoy the tracks as standalone songs - I mean, he's already singled out A&W and the track with the long title as two of her greatest songs -, but that there is a certain thematic/narrative cohesiveness and/or sonic/lyrical progression that makes everything work a lot better in context. 

I don't think that BOZ meant that we won't be able to enjoy the tracks as standalone songs - I mean, he's already singled out A&W and the track with the long title as two of her greatest songs -, but that there is a certain thematic/narrative cohesiveness and/or sonic/lyrical progression that makes everything work a lot better in context. 

I don't think that BOZ meant that we won't be able to enjoy the tracks as standalone songs - I mean, he's already singled out A&W and the track with the long title as two of her greatest songs -, but that there is a certain thematic/narrative cohesiveness and/or sonic/lyrical progression that makes everything work a lot better in context. 

Yes, BOZ said that, while the title track is a generally good representation of the (orchestral) sound and lyrical content of the album, Lana shouldn't have released any singles, because none of the tracks work as standalone singles. Apparently one should experience the entire album without having being "teased" by a track beforehand. I think that it's a very intriguing observation; I know that BOZ loves cohesive projects, so it's interesting that the album has been described as wild, chaotic, poetic/conversational/wordy and with a lot of sonic variety, but doesn't feel messy. It's the first time I've heard someone describe a Lana album that way - that it works better as an experience -, so I'm very very excited about it.
 

Yes, BOZ said that, while the title track is a generally good representation of the (orchestral) sound and lyrical content of the album, Lana shouldn't have released any singles, because none of the tracks work as standalone singles. Apparently one should experience the entire album without having being "teased" by a track beforehand. I think that it's a very intriguing observation; I know that BOZ loves cohesive projects, so it's interesting that the album has been described as wild, chaotic, poetic/conversational/wordy and with a lot of sonic variety, but doesn't feel messy. It's the first time I've heard someone describe a Lana album that way - that it works better as an experience -, so I'm very very excited about it.
 

God in heaven, stay strong. The music is AWESOME and will be amazing to hear on the full album. Sending positive energies. 

Yes, BOZ said that, while the title track is a generally good representation of the (orchestral) sound and lyrical content of the album, Lana shouldn't have released any singles, because none of the tracks work as standalone singles. Apparently one should experience the entire album without having being "teased" by a track beforehand. I think that it's a very intriguing observation; I know that BOZ loves cohesive projects, so it's interesting that the album has been described as wild, chaotic, poetic/conversational/wordy and with a lot of sonic variety, but doesn't feel messy. It's the first time I've heard someone describe a Lana album that way - that it works better as an experience -, so I'm very very excited about it.
 

Yes, BOZ said that, while the title track is a generally good representation of the (orchestral) sound and lyrical content of the album, Lana shouldn't have released any singles, because none of the tracks work as standalone singles. Apparently one should experience the entire album without having being "teased" by a track beforehand. I think that it's a very intriguing observation; I know that BOZ loves cohesive projects, so it's interesting that the album has been described as wild, chaotic, poetic/conversational/wordy and with a lot of sonic variety, but doesn't feel messy. It's the first time I've heard someone describe a Lana album that way - that it works better as an experience -, so I'm very very excited about it.
 

This is making me so excited for this album!! One of her best incoming

This was definitely the best tea. So I'm super excited too. I imagine the transitions between some tracks like Freak to Art Deco or Burn Norton to Religion. And also tracks that tell a story in chronology.

I’m so glad I still haven’t listened to the single  with every new album cycle i’ve gained more self-control, from listening to the incredibly low quality honeymoon leak, to listening to the snippets for lust for life and nfr but not to low quality leaks, to refraining from listening to anything but the singles for blue banisters, to refraining from listening to the singles. i’ve been wanting to do this for quite some time now and it’s probably easier this era than it usually is, as the pre-release is short and there are no recycled songs, almost no snippets, probably just one or two singles and most importantly no delay 

Yes, BOZ said that, while the title track is a generally good representation of the (orchestral) sound and lyrical content of the album, Lana shouldn't have released any singles, because none of the tracks work as standalone singles. Apparently one should experience the entire album without having being "teased" by a track beforehand. I think that it's a very intriguing observation; I know that BOZ loves cohesive projects, so it's interesting that the album has been described as wild, chaotic, poetic/conversational/wordy and with a lot of sonic variety, but doesn't feel messy. It's the first time I've heard someone describe a Lana album that way - that it works better as an experience -, so I'm very very excited about it.
 

Yes, BOZ said that, while the title track is a generally good representation of the (orchestral) sound and lyrical content of the album, Lana shouldn't have released any singles, because none of the tracks work as standalone singles. Apparently one should experience the entire album without having being "teased" by a track beforehand. I think that it's a very intriguing observation; I know that BOZ loves cohesive projects, so it's interesting that the album has been described as wild, chaotic, poetic/conversational/wordy and with a lot of sonic variety, but doesn't feel messy. It's the first time I've heard someone describe a Lana album that way - that it works better as an experience -, so I'm very very excited about it.
 

Yes, BOZ said that, while the title track is a generally good representation of the (orchestral) sound and lyrical content of the album, Lana shouldn't have released any singles, because none of the tracks work as standalone singles. Apparently one should experience the entire album without having being "teased" by a track beforehand. I think that it's a very intriguing observation; I know that BOZ loves cohesive projects, so it's interesting that the album has been described as wild, chaotic, poetic/conversational/wordy and with a lot of sonic variety, but doesn't feel messy. It's the first time I've heard someone describe a Lana album that way - that it works better as an experience -, so I'm very very excited about it.
 

Yes, BOZ said that, while the title track is a generally good representation of the (orchestral) sound and lyrical content of the album, Lana shouldn't have released any singles, because none of the tracks work as standalone singles. Apparently one should experience the entire album without having being "teased" by a track beforehand. I think that it's a very intriguing observation; I know that BOZ loves cohesive projects, so it's interesting that the album has been described as wild, chaotic, poetic/conversational/wordy and with a lot of sonic variety, but doesn't feel messy. It's the first time I've heard someone describe a Lana album that way - that it works better as an experience -, so I'm very very excited about it.
 

Yes, BOZ said that, while the title track is a generally good representation of the (orchestral) sound and lyrical content of the album, Lana shouldn't have released any singles, because none of the tracks work as standalone singles. Apparently one should experience the entire album without having being "teased" by a track beforehand. I think that it's a very intriguing observation; I know that BOZ loves cohesive projects, so it's interesting that the album has been described as wild, chaotic, poetic/conversational/wordy and with a lot of sonic variety, but doesn't feel messy. It's the first time I've heard someone describe a Lana album that way - that it works better as an experience -, so I'm very very excited about it.
 

Yes, BOZ said that, while the title track is a generally good representation of the (orchestral) sound and lyrical content of the album, Lana shouldn't have released any singles, because none of the tracks work as standalone singles. Apparently one should experience the entire album without having being "teased" by a track beforehand. I think that it's a very intriguing observation; I know that BOZ loves cohesive projects, so it's interesting that the album has been described as wild, chaotic, poetic/conversational/wordy and with a lot of sonic variety, but doesn't feel messy. It's the first time I've heard someone describe a Lana album that way - that it works better as an experience -, so I'm very very excited about it.
 

Yes, BOZ said that, while the title track is a generally good representation of the (orchestral) sound and lyrical content of the album, Lana shouldn't have released any singles, because none of the tracks work as standalone singles. Apparently one should experience the entire album without having being "teased" by a track beforehand. I think that it's a very intriguing observation; I know that BOZ loves cohesive projects, so it's interesting that the album has been described as wild, chaotic, poetic/conversational/wordy and with a lot of sonic variety, but doesn't feel messy. It's the first time I've heard someone describe a Lana album that way - that it works better as an experience -, so I'm very very excited about it.
 

Yes, BOZ said that, while the title track is a generally good representation of the (orchestral) sound and lyrical content of the album, Lana shouldn't have released any singles, because none of the tracks work as standalone singles. Apparently one should experience the entire album without having being "teased" by a track beforehand. I think that it's a very intriguing observation; I know that BOZ loves cohesive projects, so it's interesting that the album has been described as wild, chaotic, poetic/conversational/wordy and with a lot of sonic variety, but doesn't feel messy. It's the first time I've heard someone describe a Lana album that way - that it works better as an experience -, so I'm very very excited about it.
 

Yes, BOZ said that, while the title track is a generally good representation of the (orchestral) sound and lyrical content of the album, Lana shouldn't have released any singles, because none of the tracks work as standalone singles. Apparently one should experience the entire album without having being "teased" by a track beforehand. I think that it's a very intriguing observation; I know that BOZ loves cohesive projects, so it's interesting that the album has been described as wild, chaotic, poetic/conversational/wordy and with a lot of sonic variety, but doesn't feel messy. It's the first time I've heard someone describe a Lana album that way - that it works better as an experience -, so I'm very very excited about it.
 

That makes sense! I’m not sure if I’m making this up, but did an insider say that TUOB’s tracks didn’t all work well as standalone singles?
 
I’m almost wondering (especially given Tommy’s presence on the album) if the variety mentioned by BoZ means that the production varies noticeably among the tracks and requires a full listen for the “flow” of the record. 
 
This record can’t come soon enough

BoZ did say that 

Yep, BoZ said the album works better as an experience as opposed to a singles based approach

When the pastor interlude gets more daily streams than the entirety of Miley's album, then what? 

snoozefest?