TEMPORARY Chemtrails Over the Country Club - Pre-Release Thread: OUT March 19th, 2021

[Poor Stacy 11,995]

2 minutes ago, Jack Antonoff is a God said:

 

 

 

As long as he admits it's good. 

[Dominikx4 25,276]

5 minutes ago, FallingCherry said:

There are three 80/100 and a 70/100 on Metacritic, but the general score for the album is 82/100. I’m not a maths expert but... 

metacritic weighs each publication differently, depending on their reputation and who wrote the review. a well-known and seasoned music critic's review is gonna weighted differently to that of a relatively new critic

[Terrence Loves Me 72,099]

It will be interesting to see which direction Lana goes for her next album. I can imagine Lana's frustration and irritation after hearing her previous albums described as nothing but "costumes". That must fucking hurt, and we know how sensitive Lana is. Although she is probably extremely proud of the positive reviews for NFR and COCC, i expect she is quietly hating them for it too. She even made a slight dig at Norman by saying "I knew they'd love it, because there's nothing to dislike" or something like that, labeling it as just "cool". It feels like she is basically calling it plain and admitting that she was holding back. Now that she has the critics by the balls, it would be iconic for her to make her next album a lot more edgy, daring and controversial again, the way she was before Lust for Life. I wonder if she is curious to witness the outcome if she went back down the Born to Die, AKA, UV route again. I can imagine she must be. Would the critics and general public take her seriously once and for all, in her truest form, making the art that she loves? Or will they go back to calling her names again?

 

I hope she goes back to being a little more crazy and spontaneous after this record. Her first three albums were so vastly different. Born to Die was totally original, then she confused everyone by suddenly turning to a grungier rock album, and then we got this 1940s, lynchy, jazzy record. It was all so iconic.

 

For me it's BTD/UV/HM (stories of her past) - and then the second half of her story is LFL/NFR/COCC (stories of her future/who she wants to become)

 

So i hope she enters a full new phase now with something totally and completely fresh

[Poor Stacy 11,995]

3 minutes ago, wild caged animal said:

I am. That means one of these 80s is secretly a 100 

 

Mojo is weighted really heavily, if I remember correctly.

[FallingCherry 7,731]

4 minutes ago, Dominikx4 said:

metacritic weighs wach publication differently. Mojo f.e. is gonna carry more weight than a random newspaper

I know that, but I literally don’t understand how the score can be 82 when none of the reviews has a score above 80. Even if Mojo’s review weights more, it’s still an 80, so how can we end up with an 82? I’m so confused haha

[Lentilus 25,437]

3 minutes ago, Terrence Loves Me said:

It will be interesting to see which direction Lana goes for her next album. I can imagine Lana's frustration and irritation after hearing her previous albums described as nothing but "costumes". That must fucking hurt, and we know how sensitive Lana is. Although she is probably extremely proud of the positive reviews for NFR and COCC, i expect she is quietly hating them for it too. She even made a slight dig at Norman by saying "I knew they'd love it, because there's nothing to dislike" or something like that, labeling it as just "cool". It feels like she is basically calling it plain and admitting that she was holding back. Now that she has the critics by the balls, it would be iconic for her to make her next album a lot more edgy, daring and controversial again, the way she was before Lust for Life. I wonder if she is curious to witness the outcome if she went back down the Born to Die, AKA, UV route again. I can imagine she must be. Would the critics and general public take her seriously once and for all, in her truest form, making the art that she loves? Or will they go back to calling her names again?

 

I hope she goes back to being a little more crazy and spontaneous after this record. Her first three albums were so vastly different. Born to Die was totally original, then she confused everyone by suddenly turning to a grungier rock album, and then we got this 1940s, lynchy, jazzy record. It was all so iconic.

 

For me it's BTD/UV/HM (stories of her past) - and then the second half of her story is LFL/NFR/COCC (stories of her future/who she wants to become)

 

So i hope she enters a full new phase now with something totally and completely fresh

You really spilled with this post! 

[lustforlife 19,008]

Mojo weight on Meta is VERY HIGH. Thats why 

[COCC 29,542]

Maybe swifties will stream her in order to block Justin from #1 

[yourolllikethunder 4,879]

38 minutes ago, JehovahThikness said:

he's seemingly 95% a troll especially looking at his previous ratings on RYM and his Youtube videos, unfortunately some people will likely agree his joke reviews </3

1/100 is the only fraction of Chemtrails he could ever make himself 

[Dominikx4 25,276]

7 minutes ago, FallingCherry said:

I know that, but I literally don’t understand how the score can be 82 when none of the reviews has a score above 80. Even if Mojo’s review weights more, it’s still an 80, so how can we end up with an 82? I’m so confused haha

oh right, i didnt think about that  well... ill take it

[lustforlife 19,008]

HE IS SO BUSH LEAGUE I CANT 

 

https://popcrush.com/justin-bieber-hit-with-cease-and-desist-letter-from-electronic-duo-justice/

[Get Drunk 17,588]

omg did she just tweet someone else’s pic of her album ??

[Churchome Rep 3,314]

6 minutes ago, Terrence Loves Me said:

Now that she has the critics by the balls, it would be iconic for her to make her next album a lot more edgy, daring and controversial again, the way she was before Lust for Life. I wonder if she is curious to witness the outcome if she went back down the Born to Die, AKA, UV route again. I can imagine she must be. Would the critics and general public take her seriously once and for all, in her truest form, making the art that she loves? Or will they go back to calling her names again?

It really would be such a serve, but I don’t see it. Aesthetically, COCC is at her plainest and she was already heading that way with NFR with those homemade movies. It’s already hinted that she’s going even more country Americana next. I have faith that she can make folk glamorous but that’s only if she chooses. 

[Crimson and Clover 22,341]

10 minutes ago, FallingCherry said:

I know that, but I literally don’t understand how the score can be 82 when none of the reviews has a score above 80. Even if Mojo’s review weights more, it’s still an 80, so how can we end up with an 82? I’m so confused haha

it's probably like rotten tomatoes where a movie can have like only 90% ratings by critics but the score is 95% or 100% or something

[Salvatore91 71]

Ignore this.

Edited March 18, 2021 by Salvatore91
Found the thread I was looking for

[wild caged animal 19,760]

she's back from her hiatus 

[Lentilus 25,437]

1 minute ago, wild caged animal said:

she's back from her hiatus 

Well that lasted....

[Deadly Nightshade 12,386]

17 minutes ago, Terrence Loves Me said:

It will be interesting to see which direction Lana goes for her next album. I can imagine Lana's frustration and irritation after hearing her previous albums described as nothing but "costumes". That must fucking hurt, and we know how sensitive Lana is. Although she is probably extremely proud of the positive reviews for NFR and COCC, i expect she is quietly hating them for it too. She even made a slight dig at Norman by saying "I knew they'd love it, because there's nothing to dislike" or something like that, labeling it as just "cool". It feels like she is basically calling it plain and admitting that she was holding back. Now that she has the critics by the balls, it would be iconic for her to make her next album a lot more edgy, daring and controversial again, the way she was before Lust for Life. I wonder if she is curious to witness the outcome if she went back down the Born to Die, AKA, UV route again. I can imagine she must be. Would the critics and general public take her seriously once and for all, in her truest form, making the art that she loves? Or will they go back to calling her names again?

 

I hope she goes back to being a little more crazy and spontaneous after this record. Her first three albums were so vastly different. Born to Die was totally original, then she confused everyone by suddenly turning to a grungier rock album, and then we got this 1940s, lynchy, jazzy record. It was all so iconic.

 

For me it's BTD/UV/HM (stories of her past) - and then the second half of her story is LFL/NFR/COCC (stories of her future/who she wants to become)

 

So i hope she enters a full new phase now with something totally and completely fresh

The words that were used ( her previous albums described as costumes ) really hurt me . I truly believe that all of her work is going to be listened by many people in the years to come . It makes so happy that people are acknowledging her talent but at the same time a little bit hypocritical after so many years of slander .

I am really excited for whats to come . I really hope she amazes us again with her new music im the future .

So excited for this era and for the next one to come. .  

[littleredpartydress 49,576]

not the picture from Walmart 

[xxmissdaytonaxx 29,981]

just poured my first glass of pink champagne.. let's party girlies!!!

Spoiler