Sky Ferreira

[michellebranch 133]

@Eclipse thank you for all you shared!

[Furor Poeticus 16,351]

Y'all we won under her new ig post I wrote a comment "Ignore this comment if Masochism comes out in 2021" and she didn't like nor comment that. Team delulu till the grave! 

[Monsef 669]

7 hours ago, HyperVelvet said:

Y'all we won under her new ig post I wrote a comment "Ignore this comment if Masochism comes out in 2021" and she didn't like nor comment that. Team delulu till the grave! 

She actually liked a comment that said " are you releasing a single soon?" or something along those lines. Her ass lies like it's nobody's business tho!

[EXODUS 9,914]

11 hours ago, Monsef said:

She actually liked a comment that said " are you releasing a single soon?" or something along those lines. Her ass lies like it's nobody's business tho!

 

Watch God Kate Bush release an album first 

[Furor Poeticus 16,351]

It's a competition which compulsive liar will release their album first (or last???): The Chromatics their "Dear Tommy" or Sky her "Masochism"

[loveinstereo 30]

I haven't been on here in ages. Catching up on all the pearl clutching over her not writing her own songs is hilarious. Uh, duh? No shit?  She started her career working with Bloodshy & Avant, Greg Kurstin, Nicole Morier, etc. She's always sang other people's songs. She's a singer. That doesn't make her a "fraud". Crap like this is standard practice in the music industry. If you're disappointed, welcome to the real world, wait till you find out what Beyoncé & Rihanna are up to with their credits. This isn't the expose some of you want it to be.

[Nightmare 9,849]

Just now, loveinstereo said:

I haven't been on here in ages. Catching up on all the pearl clutching over her not writing her own songs is hilarious. Uh, duh? No shit?  She started her career working with Bloodshy & Avant, Greg Kurstin, Nicole Morier, etc. She's always sang other people's songs. She's a singer. That doesn't make her a "fraud". Crap like this is standard practice in the music industry. If you're disappointed, welcome to the real world, wait till you find out what Beyoncé & Rihanna are up to with their credits. This isn't the expose some of you want it to be.

bestie the point is sky has the nerve to be offended at other people when they make music slightly similar to hers. not writing your own songs is not an issue, pretending like you do though...that’s nasty.

 

but whatever i guess.

[111 36,678]

21 minutes ago, loveinstereo said:

I haven't been on here in ages. Catching up on all the pearl clutching over her not writing her own songs is hilarious. Uh, duh? No shit?  She started her career working with Bloodshy & Avant, Greg Kurstin, Nicole Morier, etc. She's always sang other people's songs. She's a singer. That doesn't make her a "fraud". Crap like this is standard practice in the music industry. If you're disappointed, welcome to the real world, wait till you find out what Beyoncé & Rihanna are up to with their credits. This isn't the expose some of you want it to be.

19 minutes ago, Nightmare said:

bestie the point is sky has the nerve to be offended at other people when they make music slightly similar to hers. not writing your own songs is not an issue, pretending like you do though...that’s nasty.

 

but whatever i guess.

I wasn't gonna comment on this any further lol but thank you for clarifying what's obvious. The problem is not her singing other people's songs, it's the fact that she gatekeeps the sound and attacks others for being influenced (Nasty Cherry) but what's even more troubling is that she acts like this troubled genius who writes and produces her own music and needs a decade to be able to "perfect her craft" when she basically sings other people's songs! On top of that she gets angry when fans demand the music she promised, acts like she never promised anything and blames everyone else instead of taking responsibility.

Let me just reiterate that point, the problem isn't that she is not the top songwriter and creator of her songs. It's the roleplay of "troubled genius and industry victim" who lies and makes false promises, attacks her own fans instead of taking genuine responsibility, gets upset about other female artists for being influenced and brings them down instead of showing support and takes a decade perfecting "her" craft. Enough with the Fiona Apple cosplay. But let's hear the "she doesn't owe you anything, you're entitled" brigade when she has teased new music, merch, music videos, alternate mixes and whatnot every year since 2015.

 

[loveinstereo 30]

3 minutes ago, Eclipse said:

I wasn't gonna comment on this any further lol but thank you for clarifying what's obvious. The problem is not her singing other people's songs, it's the fact that she gatekeeps the sound and attacks others for being influenced (Nasty Cherry) but what's even more troubling is that she acts like this troubled genius who writes and produces her own music and needs a decade to be able to "perfect her craft" when she basically sings other people's songs! On top of that she gets angry when fans demand the music she promised, acts like she never promised anything and blames everyone else instead of taking responsibility.

Let me just reiterate that point, the problem isn't that she is not the top songwriter and creator of her songs. It's the roleplay of "troubled genius and industry victim" who lies and makes false promises, attacks her own fans instead of taking genuine responsibility, gets upset about other female artists for being influenced and brings them down instead of showing support and takes a decade perfecting "her" craft. Enough with the Fiona Apple cosplay. But let's hear the "she doesn't own you anything, you're entitled" brigade when she has teased new music, merch, music videos, alternate mixes and whatnot every year since 2015.

 

Why are you this emotionally invested? She's not the first creative to bullshit the public & won't be the last. Most singers sell a facade of being more involved than they really are. Britney Spears called Britney Jean her most "personal" album & she didn't even sing on half the damn songs. Who cares? It's music, she's not taking credit for the covid vaccine. She's not selling plant based meals that secretly have meat in them. How writing credits affect you to the point that you're driven to run a smear campaign in defence of Nasty Cherry & Halsey is weird & legitimately laughable. All of these people have blessed lives. If Sky's taking public pot shots for no reason, it's free entertainment. Playing morality police when it comes to pop singers is freakish. This shouldn't impact anybody so deeply. If she's such a fraud, stop posting about her?

[michellebranch 133]

Don’t stop, leak more of her demos!

[Say Yes to Heaven 27,514]

5 minutes ago, loveinstereo said:

Why are you this emotionally invested? She's not the first creative to bullshit the public & won't be the last. Most singers sell a facade of being more involved than they really are. Britney Spears called Britney Jean her most "personal" album & she didn't even sing on half the damn songs. Who cares? It's music, she's not taking credit for the covid vaccine. She's not selling plant based meals that secretly have meat in them. How writing credits affect you to the point that you're driven to run a smear campaign in defence of Nasty Cherry & Halsey is weird & legitimately laughable. All of these people have blessed lives. If Sky's taking public pot shots for no reason, it's free entertainment. Playing morality police when it comes to pop singers is freakish. This shouldn't impact anybody so deeply. If she's such a fraud, stop posting about her?

It's hardly a smear campaign. Are you sky herself??? 

The problem that he has said over and over is that she tries to gatekeep her 'own' style when she wasn't even the one to create that style. 

[naturalbornloser 434]

Not y'all talking to a literal predator for the sake of tea and leaks

 

[111 36,678]

1 minute ago, loveinstereo said:

Why are you this emotionally invested? She's not the first creative to bullshit the public & won't be the last. Most singers sell a facade of being more involved than they really are. Britney Spears called Britney Jean her most "personal" album & she didn't even sing on half the damn songs. Who cares? It's music, she's not taking credit for the covid vaccine. She's not selling plant based meals that secretly have meat in them. How writing credits affect you to the point that you're driven to run a smear campaign in defence of Nasty Cherry & Halsey is weird & legitimately laughable. All of these people have blessed lives. If Sky's taking public pot shots for no reason, it's free entertainment. Playing morality police when it comes to pop singers is freakish. This shouldn't impact anybody so deeply. If she's such a fraud, stop posting about her?

You really said I'm gonna read this man's post, write a whole paragraph and completely miss the point even though it was reiterated for me multiple times. Just give it up and continue licking her ass. I don't care even if she doesn't write a single word on her songs, but I care that she constantly lies, attacks other female artists, gatekeeps a sound that she doesn't own, blames her for label for everything (so what Capitol Records prevented the release of a music video/alternate version of Downhill Lullaby? they stopped the vinyl production for NTMT Side-B too? THEY LITERALLY STOP EVERYTHING that could get them coins?) and on top of that she acts like this troubled genius who needs to perfect her craft? Who the fuck does she think she is?

Just say that you are a perfectionist who has all these ideas but you are too lazy to execute them and your label obviously doesn't wanna spend millions on your bullshit for you to end up scrapping/cancelling them so they give you a limited budget but it's too late, you already promised your fans and now you have to blame someone for your failures AND GO SKY.

[naturalbornloser 434]

s

[BeautifulAnywhere 5,417]

6 minutes ago, naturalbornloser said:

Not y'all talking to a literal predator for the sake of tea and leaks

 

Can we stop with this tired ass narrative already please? 

[Gentleman 958]

⠀

[Nightmare 9,849]

23 minutes ago, loveinstereo said:

Why are you this emotionally invested? She's not the first creative to bullshit the public & won't be the last. Most singers sell a facade of being more involved than they really are. Britney Spears called Britney Jean her most "personal" album & she didn't even sing on half the damn songs. Who cares? It's music, she's not taking credit for the covid vaccine. She's not selling plant based meals that secretly have meat in them. How writing credits affect you to the point that you're driven to run a smear campaign in defence of Nasty Cherry & Halsey is weird & legitimately laughable. All of these people have blessed lives. If Sky's taking public pot shots for no reason, it's free entertainment. Playing morality police when it comes to pop singers is freakish. This shouldn't impact anybody so deeply. If she's such a fraud, stop posting about her?

ok name me a time when britney called out another pop singer for copying her style

[princessdollie 651]

1 hour ago, Nightmare said:

bestie the point is sky has the nerve to be offended at other people when they make music slightly similar to hers. not writing your own songs is not an issue, pretending like you do though...that’s nasty.

 

but whatever i guess.

Ok true but tbh it’s not about the music industry in general Rihanna Beyoncé etc these are superstars anyone else on the same level as sky  for example like Lorde before melodrama, early lana all these indie girls write their own stuff. Nobody’s comparing sky Ferreira to Rihanna 

Edit: the whole gag over that was that she claimed to write the majority/whole song - then the writers demo leaked 

[Party Favor 10,308]

1 hour ago, naturalbornloser said:

Not y'all talking to a literal predator for the sake of tea and leaks

 

Who’s a predator 

[Ryusei 5,071]

1 hour ago, loveinstereo said:

Why are you this emotionally invested? She's not the first creative to bullshit the public & won't be the last. Most singers sell a facade of being more involved than they really are. Britney Spears called Britney Jean her most "personal" album & she didn't even sing on half the damn songs. 

Not this being the worst example ever. The most personal album sh*t was a marketing selling point her lazy team came up with to somehow sell this half-finished album and Britney only really acknowledging less than a handful of songs which really speaks to how she feels about that album. They put writing credits on there to further their "personal album" narrative. She didn't have involvement in this album whatsoever and would never claim it if she wasn't given talking points. The woman is under a conservatorship and can't even freely express her own opinions unless they are marketing safe approved. 

How is this anyhow comparable to Sky? 

Also I don't think anyone thinks of Beyoncé or Rihanna as songwriting geniuses but they are very hard-working women involved in the process (bey probably moreso since she also oversees the visuals and is very much a perfectionist) which once again can't be said about Sky. 

Anyways you're missing what the issue here is.