Lana & Politics

[Prodigal Son 19]

Yeah, it sorta tries to be clever and fails. And California is practically the capital of serial killers.

Is that you in the your pic?

 

Why are you fags rating him one star?

[expandableclitoris 9,093]

Is that you in the your pic?

 

Why are you fags rating him one star?

 

                                      

[Prodigal Son 19]

                                      

He's smart, and appears to be hot.

[softcore babyface 4,377]

Lana is one of the most tone deaf liberals out there and the line your just a man it’s just what you do is the thing that bugs you...I have to laugh

[Vertimus 9,575]

Lana is one of the most tone deaf liberals out there and the line your just a man it’s just what you do is the thing that bugs you...I have to laugh

It doesn’t bug me. I said that. I am talking about from the POV of the wider culture in this MeToo age. Just as she uses a song title, Venice Beach, which would upset some as degrading to women if Harry Styles named a song that. I am just pointing out that different rules often apply. I am sure there are some feminists find the VB title degrading and not empowering.

[softcore babyface 4,377]

It doesn’t bug me. I said that. I am talking about from the POV of the wider culture in this MeToo age. Just as she uses a song title, Venice Beach, which would upset some as degrading to women if Harry Styles named a song that. I am just pointing out that different rules often apply. I am sure there are some feminists find the VB title degrading and not empowering.

U have worms for brains.....literally no one but some woke 15 year olds on twitter woould care of a man called a song Venice bitch.

[Flowerbomb 65,594]

It doesn’t bug me. I said that. I am talking about from the POV of the wider culture in this MeToo age. Just as she uses a song title, Venice Beach, which would upset some as degrading to women if Harry Styles named a song that. I am just pointing out that different rules often apply. I am sure there are some feminists find the VB title degrading and not empowering.

 

If feminists find the title 'Venice Bitch' degrading then they need to grow a backbone because being called a 'bitch' is a low tier level insult lol

[Prodigal Son 19]

It doesn’t bug me. I said that. I am talking about from the POV of the wider culture in this MeToo age. Just as she uses a song title, Venice Beach, which would upset some as degrading to women if Harry Styles named a song that. I am just pointing out that different rules often apply. I am sure there are some feminists find the VB title degrading and not empowering.

A well mannered man would never call a woman a bitch, and "bitch" is commonly used by women when describing other women. It's why it has such derogatory implications when used by men, even if they do not intend to use it that way. It's interpreted as a form of theft and a low blow.

 

The way the word is used in Venice Bitch is pretty light-hearted and non-derogatory though so I believe if Harry Styles sang this song there most likely would be minimal uproar and it would obviously be uncalled for.

 

There are some things men can do that women can't and vica versa.

[Vertimus 9,575]

A well mannered man would never call a woman a bitch, and "bitch" is commonly used by women when describing other women. It's why it has such derogatory implications when used by men, even if they do not intend to use it that way. It's interpreted as a form of theft and a low blow.

 

The way the word is used in Venice Bitch is pretty light-hearted and non-derogatory though so I believe if Harry Styles sang this song there most likely would be minimal uproar and it would obviously be uncalled for.

 

There are some things men can do that women can't and vica versa.

 

And those 'rules' are changing constantly from one person to another, one subculture to another, one coast to another, one class to another. 

[SparkleJumpropeNoose 8,750]

why are we talking about h*rry styles i hate y'all phags

[drowning mermaid 1,706]

It doesn’t bug me. I said that. I am talking about from the POV of the wider culture in this MeToo age. Just as she uses a song title, Venice Beach, which would upset some as degrading to women if Harry Styles named a song that. I am just pointing out that different rules often apply. I am sure there are some feminists find the VB title degrading and not empowering.

my friends call me bitch all the time and it’s no biggie, but when a straight man calls me a bitch it’s fucking terrifying because it’s used in a different context and it’s meant to dehumanize me

[Prodigal Son 19]

And those 'rules' are changing constantly from one person to another, one subculture to another, one coast to another, one class to another.

 

It's why context and intention are important.

[Edelgard 1,836]

It doesn’t bug me. I said that. I am talking about from the POV of the wider culture in this MeToo age. Just as she uses a song title, Venice Beach, which would upset some as degrading to women if Harry Styles named a song that. I am just pointing out that different rules often apply. I am sure there are some feminists find the VB title degrading and not empowering.

Yea different rules apply to women and men and as long as women get the short end of it they can name a song whatever the fuck they want

Bitch... really. Thats the kind of feminism you pretend to care about?

Youre just trying to make a point , you dont give a fuck about women

[amostori 780]

wait is a man actually preaching to women how women should feel about a song title YIKES

 

edit: after being called a bitch for every small thing i do that displeases men i either know or am just passing, a song titled venice bitch by a woman is not an issue at all

[Rorman Nockwell 56,814]

Seriously, what the fuck is this discussion?

 

There is no such thing as women being sexist against men (ie: "reverse" sexism - or the reverse form of any oppression). Women can be prejudiced, but they cannot be sexist, because they do not hold political, economic, and institutional power. Men do.

[Barry 5,951]

Seriously, what the fuck is this discussion?

 

There is no such thing as women being sexist against men (ie: "reverse" sexism - or the reverse form of any oppression). Women can be prejudiced, but they cannot be sexist, because they do not hold political, economic, and institutional power. Men do.

 

Some men do, some men have nothing.  Judge individuals by their own actions.

[Cacciatore 19,347]

Seriously, what the fuck is this discussion?

 

There is no such thing as women being sexist against men (ie: "reverse" sexism - or the reverse form of any oppression). Women can be prejudiced, but they cannot be sexist, because they do not hold political, economic, and institutional power. Men do.

 

Imagine getting offended by a line as inoffensive as "you're just a man" the male ego really is something else...

[sirensXsilence 462]

Y'all realize you're being baited by a troll, right?

[SparkleJumpropeNoose 8,750]

me logging on after a long day to see people debating on the legitimacy of "reverse sexism"

[BeautifulAnywhere 5,417]

Seriously, what the fuck is this discussion?

 

There is no such thing as women being sexist against men (ie: "reverse" sexism - or the reverse form of any oppression). Women can be prejudiced, but they cannot be sexist, because they do not hold political, economic, and institutional power. Men do.

What kinda bullshit is this? Anybody can be sexist. It doesn’t matter who are being terrible is being terrible at the end of the day. Are we gonna say now that if a girl at school Is smacking a guy because she’s a girl who doesn’t hold power (she’s just a student) he can’t defend himself? Anybody holds the power to be racist or sexist saying otherwise is encouraging a toxic environment where people aren’t held accountable or where the seriousness of the situation can be downplayed.

Also, why is this being discussed in this thread? What did I miss?