West Coast

no unreleased scraps please. we don't want a repeat of that bar mess

love the Honeymoon cover. She looks so small and isolated, but it highkey serves the story of the album.  
But as for COCC, I’m eager to hear what she’s been working on. I hope we get a single sometime in June.
Wait why is she releasing on a Saturday?

and also, while they might not be as popular they certainly hold their own, Neil Krug and Nicole Nodland. 
 
But for real I think the 'Honeymoon' cover is cute, but the perspective is a little strange, like Lana looks weirdly small on there. The 'Lust for Life' cover... Lana's pose and smile look hella weird and 'NFR!' just looks too mismatched, the idea behind the cover is interesting, but the execution is choppy.

and also, while they might not be as popular they certainly hold their own, Neil Krug and Nicole Nodland. 
 
But for real I think the 'Honeymoon' cover is cute, but the perspective is a little strange, like Lana looks weirdly small on there. The 'Lust for Life' cover... Lana's pose and smile look hella weird and 'NFR!' just looks too mismatched, the idea behind the cover is interesting, but the execution is choppy.

I think she just can't really capture her own sound in her own words sometimes.
 
Just going by examples: when she said we'd hear the 'Born To Die' strings on 'Ultraviolence', but that ended up just being on the title track. Or that 'Honeymoon' would be this jazzy album with a touch of "soft grunge", but it ended up being this very cinematic record mixed with trap beats (with some jazz-y influences, but still not the golden era of jazz album she initially described). Or when she said we'd hear a lot of 60s pop/Shangri Las influences on 'Lust for Life' but besides some light instrumentation and the doo wop doo wop on the title track and on 'Get Free' the record was nothing like that. Now with 'NFR!', sis said the album would be reminiscent of Red Hot Chili Peppers... that was just straight up wrong.

There are already two things I'm sure about this record:
 
1. There won't be a clear "aesthetic".
2. Whatever Lana says about how the album is going to be like sonically, it's going to sound nothing like what she described.

and also, while they might not be as popular they certainly hold their own, Neil Krug and Nicole Nodland. 
 
But for real I think the 'Honeymoon' cover is cute, but the perspective is a little strange, like Lana looks weirdly small on there. The 'Lust for Life' cover... Lana's pose and smile look hella weird and 'NFR!' just looks too mismatched, the idea behind the cover is interesting, but the execution is choppy.

blink twice if you need help

It’s amazing how Lana has worked with some of the most iconic photographers like Steven Klein, Ellen Von U, David LaChapelle, Sean and Sang, Bruce Weber...but lets Chuck create covers like Honeymoon and Lust for Life

we're not all crappy fake stans meet clout chasers ya know

we're not all crappy fake stans meet clout chasers ya know

we're not all crappy fake stans meet clout chasers ya know

imagine if we got to be lana's stylists, managers, creative directors, etc....the power that this era would have... or just being a friend of lana's and just being able to tell her our ideas tbh

Will someone please just get her on a bond movie track the world needs it

There are already two things I'm sure about this record:
 
1. There won't be a clear "aesthetic".
2. Whatever Lana says about how the album is going to be like sonically, it's going to sound nothing like what she described.

no shot-on-iphone visuals please

No thanks she can keep that

I think she just can't really capture her own sound in her own words sometimes.
 
Just going by examples: when she said we'd hear the 'Born To Die' strings on 'Ultraviolence', but that ended up just being on the title track. Or that 'Honeymoon' would be this jazzy album with a touch of "soft grunge", but it ended up being this very cinematic record mixed with trap beats (with some jazz-y influences, but still not the golden era of jazz album she initially described). Or when she said we'd hear a lot of 60s pop/Shangri Las influences on 'Lust for Life' but besides some light instrumentation and the doo wop doo wop on the title track and on 'Get Free' the record was nothing like that. Now with 'NFR!', sis said the album would be reminiscent of Red Hot Chili Peppers... that was just straight up wrong.

There are already two things I'm sure about this record:
 
1. There won't be a clear "aesthetic".
2. Whatever Lana says about how the album is going to be like sonically, it's going to sound nothing like what she described.

I think she just can't really capture her own sound in her own words sometimes.
 
Just going by examples: when she said we'd hear the 'Born To Die' strings on 'Ultraviolence', but that ended up just being on the title track. Or that 'Honeymoon' would be this jazzy album with a touch of "soft grunge", but it ended up being this very cinematic record mixed with trap beats (with some jazz-y influences, but still not the golden era of jazz album she initially described). Or when she said we'd hear a lot of 60s pop/Shangri Las influences on 'Lust for Life' but besides some light instrumentation and the doo wop doo wop on the title track and on 'Get Free' the record was nothing like that. Now with 'NFR!', sis said the album would be reminiscent of Red Hot Chili Peppers... that was just straight up wrong.

There are already two things I'm sure about this record:
 
1. There won't be a clear "aesthetic".
2. Whatever Lana says about how the album is going to be like sonically, it's going to sound nothing like what she described.

Here we go again...

I think she just can't really capture her own sound in her own words sometimes.
 
Just going by examples: when she said we'd hear the 'Born To Die' strings on 'Ultraviolence', but that ended up just being on the title track. Or that 'Honeymoon' would be this jazzy album with a touch of "soft grunge", but it ended up being this very cinematic record mixed with trap beats (with some jazz-y influences, but still not the golden era of jazz album she initially described). Or when she said we'd hear a lot of 60s pop/Shangri Las influences on 'Lust for Life' but besides some light instrumentation and the doo wop doo wop on the title track and on 'Get Free' the record was nothing like that. Now with 'NFR!', sis said the album would be reminiscent of Red Hot Chili Peppers... that was just straight up wrong.

I think she just can't really capture her own sound in her own words sometimes.
 
Just going by examples: when she said we'd hear the 'Born To Die' strings on 'Ultraviolence', but that ended up just being on the title track. Or that 'Honeymoon' would be this jazzy album with a touch of "soft grunge", but it ended up being this very cinematic record mixed with trap beats (with some jazz-y influences, but still not the golden era of jazz album she initially described). Or when she said we'd hear a lot of 60s pop/Shangri Las influences on 'Lust for Life' but besides some light instrumentation and the doo wop doo wop on the title track and on 'Get Free' the record was nothing like that. Now with 'NFR!', sis said the album would be reminiscent of Red Hot Chili Peppers... that was just straight up wrong.